Chhattisgarh Court August 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Balsai Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (Now Chhattisgarh)
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Aug-01-2001
Reported in: 2002(1)MPHT12(CG)
R.S. Garg, J. 1. The appellant being aggrieved by the judgment dated 30-12-1994 passed in Sessions Trial No. 4 of 1994 by the learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Raigarh convicting the appellant under Section 304 Part-II, IPC and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for eight years has filed this appeal,2. The prosecution case in brief is that on 140-1993 Baju and Chhandu had gone to see the accused as he was a little unwell, at about 3/4 A.M. the accused hit Baju by means of an axe on the back of the left parietal region, after hearing the alarms and the shouts the other inmates of the house woke up and caught the accused. They found that Baju had died on the spot. A report was lodged at about 11.00 A.M. on which an inquest was made. The body of the deceased was inspected and sent for post-mortem. Stained and plain earth, mattress, bed-sheet and clothes of the accused so also the axe were recovered. The statements of the witnesses were recorded. After submission of th...
Elisha Walker Vs. Smt. Kusum Pushpa Tirki and ors.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Aug-01-2001
Reported in: 2001CriLJ4446; 2002(1)MPHT73(CG)
ORDERR.S. Garg, J.1. By this revision petition, the applicant seeks to challenge the correctness, validity and propriety of the order dated 2-11-2000 passed in unregistered criminal case (Elisha Walker v. Smt. Kusum Pushpa Tirki), rejecting the complainant's complaint.2. Shri A.N. Bhakt, learned counsel for the applicant, submits that the applicant had examined this ownself and had examined one witness in support of his contention that the accused persons committed the alleged offence. According to him, the learned Trial Court called for the report from the police station. The said police authority submitted before the Court that the present complaint appeared to be counter-blast to exert pressure upon the accused persons. The learned Trial Court by the order impugned observed that the complaint appeared to be belated and a counter-blast of a criminal case registered against the present applicant on the complaint of the accused persons. It accordingly rejected the application. Accordin...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›