Chhattisgarh Court December 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
In Re: V.G. Tamaskar, Advocate
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Dec-14-2001
Reported in: 2001(5)MPHT58(CG)
ORDER1. The matter relates to conduct of an advocate regarding submission while making special request for listing a case urgently.2. Shri Tamaskar, in the court slip has mentioned in red ink as under:'If the Court slip is not entertained, it is prayed therefore that it may be returned with endorsement 'rejected' for so that counsel for respondent can inform her accordingly.'In view of the averments and expressions made and language used in the Court slip, the present case was registered.3. In the present case, Shri V.G. Tamaskar has also filed a confidential letter purported to be written by Shri Raj Kamal Singh, Advocate, Bilaspur, to the Registrar/A.R. (J). In the letter itself, it is mentioned that it is confidential. In the application Shri Tamaskar has not mentioned as to how the said letter has come in his possession.4. A perusal of this letter shows that Shri Rajkamal Singh, Advocate, submitted this letter to the Registrar/Additional Registrar (Judicial) and desired the matter ...
Vinod Kumar Shadangi Vs. State Administrative Tribunal, Bench at Raipu ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Dec-07-2001
Reported in: 2002(2)MPHT86(CG)
ORDER1. Heard finally with the consent of the parties along with other connected matters analogously.2. It is pointed out that earlier in Writ Petition No. 1343 of 2001 (Chhattisgarh Tratiya Warg Shaskiya Karmachari Sangh v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.) learned Single Bench of this Court had passed order on 20-8-2001 with some observations. Learned Single Bench of this Court has also passed orders in the petitions filed by the individuals.3. After passing of the orders by learned Single Bench of this Court some of the petitioners approached the State Govt./competent authority by making representations and some have approached the Commissioner as was directed in the order.4. Feeling aggrieved by the decision on their representations some of them approached the State Administrative Tribunal by filing Original Applications. Learned State Administrative Tribunal passed individual orders in each of the petition. Against the order passed by the State Administrative Tribunal the petitioner...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›