Chhattisgarh Court November 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ku. B. Usha Dandasi and anr. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-24-2001
Reported in: 2001(5)MPHT12(CG)
ORDERFakhruddin, J.1. This Revision has been preferred against the order dated 25-01-2001 passed by the Special Judge, Durg in S.T. No. 22/2001, whereby charge under Section 306/34 of I.P.C. has been framed against the applicants.2. Briefly narrated the facts are that Ku. Beenu Sharma, the girl aged about 19 years was a student of Class XII. She was studying in Saraswathi Higher Secondary School, Kailash Nagar, Bhilai. The applicants are class fellows and were studying in the same Section. Accusations were made against the deceased that she is a thief and has stolen articles. The incident of alleged theft occurred in the class room on 12-08-2000 and 16-08-2000. The suicidal note is there on the record and has been filed at page No. 27 as Annexure A-10. A perusal of the suicidal note prima facie goes to show that name of Usha and Archana are mentioned with reference of the accusations made against the deceased.3. The prosecution has also recorded the statements of the witnesses includin...
Ram Pratap Yadav Vs. Anand Ram and ors.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-20-2001
Reported in: 2001(5)MPHT56(CG)
ORDERFakhruddin, J.1. This revision petition has been filed by the complainant challenging the order dated 8-11-2000, passed in S.T. No. 242/2000 whereby the non applicants 1 & 2 have been discharged of the offence punishable under Section 307 of IPC and instead charge under Section 324/34 of IPC has been framed.2. According to the prosecution, while the applicant/complainant going on a bicycle from Pali Markadih, to Janjgir, near the Railway bridge the non applicants 1 & 2 met him on the way and non applicant No. 1 inflicted injuries on the neck, back, right hand, shoulder and on various other parts of his body with a tangia. On a report being lodged at police station Janjgir, offence under Section 307 of IPC was registered against the non applicants. The complainant/applicant was sent for medical examination and he remained admitted in hospital from 23-4-2000 to 9-5-2000.3. Counsel for the State has produced the medical report. From the medical report it is clear that the injured/app...
Vinod Kumar JaIn Vs. Smt. Pushpalata Paruthi
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-09-2001
Reported in: 2001(5)MPHT7(CG)
ORDERFakhruddin, J.1. The applicant has preferred this revision against the order dated 21-11-2000 passed by the Rent Controlling Authority, Dhamtary in case No. 12-A/90(8) of 98-99 whereby the application filed by the respondent under Section 23(B) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act for ejectment has been allowed.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the non- applicant filed a petition for eviction before the Rent Controlling Authority claiming that she being widow comes under Special Category of the landlords under Section 23-J (III) of the Act. The applicant Vinod Jain is tenant and is carrying on the business of hotel in the premises. The portion is a required by the landlady for bonafide need for carrying on her own business. The tenant filed reply and submitted that he is tenant on monthly rent in the disputed premises since last 31 years. There is no bonafide need of the landlady to start her own business but it is a pretext. In fact she wants to sell the disputed ...
Bhilai Engineering Corporation Ltd. Vs. Pragatisheel Engineering Shram ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-08-2001
Reported in: 2002(1)MPHT35(CG)
ORDERFakhruddin, J. 1. The records of the Industrial Court has been received.2. Respondent Union has filed return to the petition. It has also filed application seeking interim direction to both parties.3. Respondent Union has also filed affidavits of workers.4. Held learned counsel Sarvshri P.S. Nair, N.S. Kale, N.C. Jain, H.N. Vyas, Rohit Arya, R.K. Gupta (JBP), Manindra Shrivastava, Ashish Shrivastava and Shri P.S. Koshy, for the employer/Company and Shri Ranbir Singh and Shri Gautam Bhaduri, Govt. Advocates for the State and employees/ Union by Shri Sujay Pal. It is pertinent to mention that in this case, hearing has taken continuously from time to time and Shri Pal, Shri Kanak Tiwari and Shri R.K. Gupta (BSP) have also addressed the Court for employees/Union.5. The Union/employees filed various petitions for reinstatement with back wages and the petitioner/employer company has filed this petition against the award dated 16-10-1999 passed by the Industrial Court, Raipur. The Compan...
Gopi Alias Gopal Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-05-2001
Reported in: 2001(5)MPHT19(CG)
Fakhruddin, J.1. The appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life coupled with a fine of Rs. 2000/-.2. According to the prosecution the incident occurred on 17-9-99 at about 5.00 p.m. It is alleged that Pohduram was assaulted by means of lathi/danda by the accused Gopi @ Gopal on his head. He was taken to the hospital at about 7.15 p.m. where he was examined by the doctor. The deceased died after five days on 23- 9-99. The post mortem was conducted by Dr. R.K. Singh (P.W. 8). The post mortem report is Ex. P/13. The report of the incident was lodged as per Ex. P/7 for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 341, 506 and 294 I.P.C. The injured succumbed to death and the post mortem was conducted vide Annexure P/11. The report is as under :'Head injury on left side peritotemporal lobe in oblique direction size 6 Cm X 2 Cm X 2 Cm bleeding comes. When open the skull internal Haem...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›