Chennai Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Periyanayaki Vs R. Santhoshkumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 29/06/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI in Periyanayaki ... Petitioner Vs R. Santhoshkumar ... RespondentPRAYER :- To exempt the petitioner from surrendering before the Trial Court in connection with the sentence imposed upon the petitioner in Crl.A.No. 170 of 2023 on the file of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Karur wherein confirmed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Karur, vide judgment dated 23.02.2026 passed in Crl.A.No.170 of 2023 pending final disposal of the Criminal Revision Petition. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian, Advocate.L. VICTORIA GOWRI, J.pnnORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.2. In view of the endorsement so made, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 29.06.2026 pnn To 1.The Principal Dist...
R.Jeyganesh Vs The Tahsildar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY R.Jeyganesh ... Petitioner Vs1. The Tahsildar,2. The Surveyor,3. The Inspector of Police, Kodaikanal Police Station,4. Chellapandi5. Chinnathurai ... RespondentsPRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to conduct survey in respect of the petitioner's lands comprised in Survey Nos.1017/3, 1017/5 and 1017/6 measuring a total extent of 3.60.00 hectares situated at Poombarai Village Panchayat, Kodaikanal Taluk, Dindigul District, in accordance with law and further direct the third respondent to provide adequate police protection at the time of survey by considering the petitioner'srepresentation dated 16.06.2026. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sankar For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.S.Siva Thilakar Counsel for State of Tamil Nadu For R-3 : Mr.J.Vishnu Government Advocate(criminal s...
Manikandan Vs Dhanalakshmi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
CMP(MD) No. 11396 of 2024 in C.R.P(MD).No.SR59900 of 2024 S.SOUNTHAR.J I am satisfied with the reason given in the affidavit filed in support of this revision, the delay is condoned and this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. 2.Registry is directed to number the civil revision petition, if it is otherwise in order and list the matter for admission in the usual Course. 29.06.2026 Rmk 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
N.Manimekalai Vs State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Principal Secr ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and W.M.P.(MD) No.13501 of 2026 N.Manimekalai ... Petitioner -vs- 1.State of Tamil Nadu rep.by its Principal Secretary School Education Department Secretariat, Chennai-92.The Director of Elementary Education DPI Campus, Chennai-6 3.The District Educational Officer (Elementary) Oddanchathiram Dindigul Disttrict 4.The Block Educational Officer Vedasanthur, Dindigul District 5.The Principal Accountant General Office of the Accountant General (A&E) 361, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai-186.The Sub Treasury Officer Vedasanthur Dindigul District ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in No.1939/A1/2024, dated 25.04.2025, on the file of the fourth respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently for a direction directi...
M.Anand Arun Prakash, Vs The Additional Chief Secretary to Government,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 29.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and WMP(MD)No.13578 of 2026 M.Anand Arun Prakash ... Petitioner vs.1. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Revenue and Disaster Management Department Fort St. George Chennai - 600 009.2. The Commissioner of Revenue Administration Chepauk Chennai - 600 005.3. The District Collector Thoothukudi District Thoothukudi.4. The Revenue Divisional OfficerThoothukudi District Thoothukudi ... Respondents PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to conduct transfer counseling only after furnishing of theseniority list strictly in accordance with clause 2(I) of G.O.Ms.No.515, Revenue and Disaster Management Department dated 25.08.2008 inclusive of claims under the special category and give opportunity for redressal of grievance prior to the Transfer Counseling a...
Chinnaiyan Vs Srinivasan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR Chinnaiyan Petitioner(s) Vs 1.Srinivasan 2.Rajendran 3.The Tahsildar, Lalgudi, Trichy. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Karthik For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Vinayak (for R1 & R2) Mr.R.S.Sivakumar Government Advocate (civil) (for R3) Prayer:Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 1055 days in filing the above Civil Revision Petition.Prayer in C.R.P(MD).No.SR53922 of 2024: To partly set aside the orderpassed in I.A.No.01 of 2019 in O.S.No.171 of 2006 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Lalgudi and modify the order by giving liberty to the petitioner to file fresh suit.ORDERThe petition is filed seeking to condone the delay of 1055 days in filing the revision petition. 2.In the affidavit filed in support of the condone delay petition, it is stated by the petitioner that due to his old age and hearing problem, he co...
Periya Muthaiah Vs P.Nesamani
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
C.M.P.(MD)No.12083 of 2024 in C.R.P.(MD)No.SR.63091 of 2024S.SOUNTHAR, J.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay is condoned and the petition is allowed.2. The Registry is directed to number the Civil Revision Petition, if it is otherwise in order and list the matter 'for admission' on 03.07.2026.3. The Registry is also directed to print the name of Mr.H.Arumugm, at the time of admission for respondent. 29.06.2026 vsm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
A.Mariappan vs Principal Secretary to
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.(MD)No.22598 of 2025 A.Mariappan ... Petitioner -vs- 1.Principal Secretary to Government, Cooperation, Food and Consumer Protection (CCP) Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli (Po) & (Dt.), Pin 627 002. 3.Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Perumalpuram, 4.Cooperative Sub Registrar / Liquidator, (unit: Thirumalai Mills Employees Cooperative Thrift and Credit Society Ltd). Office of the Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Perumalpuram, Tirunelveli (Po) & (Dt). ... RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the First respondent's order G.O.(Ms)No.113, Cooperation, Food and Consumer Protection (CP2) Department dated 29.09.2016, confirming the orders of the s...
M.Ayyandoss Vs V.Srinivasan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
A memo has been filed on behalf of the learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent stating that Mr.M.Kannan, the first counsel for the first respondent has been appointed as counsel for Government (Civil Side) and hence, his name may be removed in the cause list.2. The memo is recorded. The Registry is directed remove the name of Mr.M.Kannan from the cause list.3. Heard Mr.S.Ramesh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners,Mr.R.Senthil Prabhakar, learned counsel appearing for the first respondent and Mr.R.S.Sivakumar, learned Government Advocate (Civil Side) appearing for the second respondent.4. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay is condoned and the petition is allowed.5. The Registry is directed to number the Revision Petition, if it is otherwise in order. vsm vsm in C.R.P.(MD)SR.No.67557 of 2021...
S.Dharani Vs N.Sundararajan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-29-2026
CMP(MD) No.14831 of 2024 in C.R.P(MD).No.SR73665 of 2024 S.SOUNTHAR.J I am satisfied with the reason given in the affidavit filed in support of this revision, the delay is condoned and this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. 2.Registry is directed to number the civil revision petition, if it is otherwise inorder and list the matter for admission in theusual course. 29.06.2026 Rmk 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »