Chennai Court June 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
T.Sudhakaran Vs The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) L ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR T.Sudhakaran ... Petitioner -vs- The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., rep.by its Managing Director Madurai ... RespondentPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the delayed disbursement of petitioner's terminal benefits, including, provident fund, gratuity and terminal leave salary for the period from the date of his retirement till the date of actual disbursement and consequently direct the respondent to settle the same to him within a time frame that may be fixed by this Court.For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rahul For Respondent : Mr.S.Ramachandra Pradeep Standing CounselORDERMr.S.Ramachandra Pradeep, learned Standing Counsel, takes notice for the respondent Transport Corporation.2. With the consent of both sides, this...
A.Alagarsamy Vs The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) L ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR A.Alagarsamy ... Petitioner -vs- The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., rep.by its Managing Director Madurai ... RespondentPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the delayed disbursement of petitioner's terminal benefits, including, provident fund, gratuity and terminal leave salary for the period from the date of his retirement till the date of actual disbursement and consequently direct the respondent to settle the same to him within a time frame that may be fixed by this Court.For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rahul For Respondent : Mr.S.Ramachandra Pradeep Standing CounselORDERMr.S.Ramachandra Pradeep, learned Standing Counsel, takes notice for the respondent Transport Corporation.2. With the consent of both sides, this...
Rajan Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Koodankulam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
CRL.MP(MD)No.12604 of 2026 in CRLA.(MD)SR.No.34119 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.AND R.POORNIMA, J This petition is filed to condone the delay of 198 days in filing the above appeal.2. Learned counsel for the State (Crl.Side) who takes notice for the respondent, has no objection in the delay being condoned and the appeal being numbered.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the supporting affidavit, delay is condoned and this petition is allowed. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if the papers are otherwise inorder.(A.D.J.C, J.) (R.P, J) bala 30.06.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Krishnamoorthi Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Dcb
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 30/06/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR1. Krishnamoorthi, S/o. Angamuthu, No. 3/147 A,Nagappamuthlipudur Sallai, Unniyur, Thottiyam, Trichy District..2. Subha,,W/o. Krishnamoorthi, No. 3/147 A,Nagappamuthlipudur Sallai, Unniyur, Thottiyam, Trichy District.. ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.3 and 4 Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, DCB Police Station, Trichy District. Crime No. 9 of 2026.. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.P. Surliraja, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian, Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) For Intervener : Mr.S.Vidhya Sagar PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- C-24B. For Bail in Crime No. 9/2026 on the file of the respondent police.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-The petitioners/A3 and A4, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 09.06.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 316, 318(4)...
Ravichandran Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Alangan ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR1. Ravichandran2. Gopalakrishnan3. Vedhanayagi4. Selvi5. Jayashree ... Petitioners Vs1. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Alanganallur, Cr.No.440 of 2025.2. Achuthan... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, to call for the records pertaining to the Impugned FIR in crime No. 440 of 2025 dated 20.11.2025 on the file of 1st Respondent Police, and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.A.Saravanan For Respondents : Mr.G.Ganesh Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1ORDERThe present petition has been filed by the accused persons in Cr.No.440 of 2025 on the file of the first respondent police, seeking a direction to quash the FIR, wherein they are alleged to have committed offences punishable under Sections and 109, 115(2), 118(1), 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 351(3) BNS and Section 4 of Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act ...
Murugan Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Pamban
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 30/06/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR Murugan, S/o.Erulandi, Therkuvadi, Pamban, Rameshwaram Taluk Ramanathapuram District.. ... Petitioner/A2 Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by , The Inspector of Police, Pamban Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. Crime No.74/2026.. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.P.Suresh, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian, Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- C-32B For Bail in Crime No.74/2026 on the file of the respondent Police.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-The petitioner/A2, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 20.05.2026 for the alleged offence under Sections 8(c) and 20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act, 1985, in Crime No.74 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused were found i...
Pattan @ Pattu Vs The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons and Correcti ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R. POORNIMA WP Crl.(MD) No.3563 of 2026 Pattan @ Pattu Petitioner(s) Vs. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.A.S.Prabhu For Respondent(s): Mr.T.Lenin Kumar, Counsel for State of Tamilnadu(Crl.Side) Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to grant 28 days Ordinary Leave without police escort to the petitioner namely Pattan @ Pattu, S/o. Murugan, Life Convict PID No.29142 confined at Open Air Prison, Purasadai Udaippu, Sivagangai.ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA J.) This petition is filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to grant 28 days ordinary leave without police escort to the petitioner namely Pattan @ Pattu, S/o. Murugan, Life Convict PID No.29142 confined at Open Air Prison, Purasa...
Balasubramanian Vs The Commissioner of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Balasubramanian ... Petitioner Vs.1. The Commissioner of Police, Trichy District.2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Woraiyur Range, Trichy District.3. The State Rep by the Inspector of PoliceWoraiyur Police Station, Trichy District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to take action on my complaint based receipt in C.S.R.No.78/2026 dated.29.03.2026 as expeditiously as possible. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Selvam For Respondents : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy Government Advocate (Crl.)ORDERThis petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the 3rd respondent to take action on the petitioner's complaint in C.S.R.No.78/2026 dated 29.03.2026 as expeditiously as possible.2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that thepetitioner is the owner...
P.Azhagumani Vs The Superintendent of Police, Madurai
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR1. P.Azhagumani2. P. Sarvaratchagan3. R. Perumal ... Petitioners Vs2. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police,3. Pandi... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, to direct the 2nd respondent herein not to harass the petitioners and their family member on the guise of enquiry and except in accordance with law. For Petitioners : Mr.M.Shakulhameed For Respondents : Mr.B.Arun Counsel for State of TN(Crl.Side) For R1 & R2ORDERThe present petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking a direction as against the 2nd respondent not to harass them on the guise of enquiry.2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for therespondent 1 and 2 submits that the complaint as against the petitioners has been closed on 24.06.2026 and they would not be called for any enquiry. 3.With the above said observations, this Criminal...
K.Ganesan Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.06.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI K.Ganesan ... Petitioner Vs.1. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Puliyankudi, Tenkasi District.2. The Inspector of Police,Sivagiri Police Station, Tenkasi District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent dated 22.06.2026 vide his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.89/Mike/SDOP/2026 quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to grant permission to conduct Aadal Paadal programme during Aani month Thiruvizha scheduled to be held on 11.07.2026 at about 06.00 p.m., to be conducted at Arulmigu Thatankulam Kaliamman Temple, Devipattanam, Sivagiri Taluk, Tenkasi District.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Krishnan For Respondents : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy Government Advocate (Crl.)ORDERThis petition has been fil...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »