Skip to content

Chennai Court March 2026 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 30 2026

D.K.Elangovan vs the Commissioner

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and W.M.P.No.734 of 2024 D.K.Elangovan ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to restore the street, R.K.R. Nagar, Dharapuram (TK), Tiruppur (Dt), vide tax No.0007695. For Petitioner(s) : No appearance For Respondent(s) : No appearanceORDERThis writ petition has been filed to direct the respondent to restore the Street, R.K.R.Nagar, Dharapuram [TK], Tiruppur [DT], vide tax No.0007695.2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representationon either side. However, perusal of the affidavit filed in support of this writ Page1 of 3 petition reveals that the petitioner has remitted the entire water tax payable to the respondent. Hence, the petitioner is entitled for restoration of water supply.3. In view of the above, this Court d...


Mar 30 2026

Government of Tamil Nadu vs Tamil Nadu State Transport Employees Feder ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

2026:MHC:1359IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU1. Government Of Tamil Nadu Rep By Its Addl.Chief, Transport Department, Govt.Of Tamil Nadu, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.2. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (coimbatore) Ltd., Rep. By Its Managing Director, 37 Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore - 641 043. ..Appellant(s) Vs1. Tamil Nadu State Transport Employees Federation Rep By Its General Secretary, No.52, Cooks Road, Otteri, Chennai- 600 012.2. The Addl.Chief Secretary Labour Welfare And Skill Development Department, Fort St. George, Chennai- 600 009.3. The Commissioner Of Labour O/o. The Commissioner Of Labour, Dms Complex, Teynampet, Chennai - 600 006.4. The Special Joint Commissioner Of Labour O/o.The Commissioner Of Labour, Dms Complex, Teynampet, Chennai- 600 006.5. Metropolitan Transport Corporation Ltd., Rep By Its Managing Director, Pallavan Illam, Ann...


Mar 30 2026

INDIAN BANK Harbour Branch, No.31, Rajaji Salai, Madras 600 001. Vs HA ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Indian Bank Harbour Branch No.31, Rajaji Salai Madras 600 001 ... Appellant vs Habib Bank Business at Bergstrasse 21, P.O.Box, 4931, 8022 Zurich, Switzerland ... Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the judgment and decree dated 29.01.1998 passed by II Additional City Civil Court Judge in O.S.No.4405 of 1996. For Appellants : Ms.Rita Chandrasekar for M/s.Aiyar and Dolia For Respondent : No AppearanceJUDGMENT[Judgment of the Court was delivered by C.V. KARTHIKEYAN, J] The plaintiff in O.S.No.4405 of 1996 on the file of II Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 29.01.1998 by whichjudgment the suit was decreed against the first to third defendants, but dismissedagainst the fourth defendant has filed the present appeal questioning the dismissal of su...


Mar 30 2026

Sivaperumal vs Palanisamy

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

CMP.No. 505 of 2026 and S.A.No. 700 of 2014 R.SAKTHIVEL, J., Ms.Ambiga, representing Mr.J.Manikandan, Counsel on record for the Petitioner is before the Court.2.As per the order dated March 30, 2026, the Petitioner paid a sum of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand Only) to the High Court Legal Services Authority, Chennai. To that effect, the learned Counsel annexed the receipt issued by the High Court Legal Services Authority, Chennai. The Compliance is recorded. No further orders are required in this Civil Miscellaneous Petition.20.04.2026 MSM Page1 of 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


Mar 30 2026

State of Tamil nadu Vs M.Umamaheswari

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on : 24.03.2026Pronounced on : 30.03.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR Rev. Appln. No.212 of 2023 in WP.No.26369 of 20091. State of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Secretary to Government School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai 9. 2.Director of School Education Chennai 6. ... Applicants vs1. M.Umamaheswari2.Head Master Corporation Higher Secondary School 118, K.R. Koil Street, West Mambalam, Chennai 600 033. 3.Teachers Recruitment Board rep by its Chairman Chennai 6. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 and 2 of C.P.C r/w.114 of CPC to review the order passed in WP.No.26369 of 2009 dated 08.03.2019. For Applicants : Mr.M.Sureshkumar, AAG Assisted by Mrs.P.Rajarajeswari, GA For Respondents : Mr.V.Sivalingam for C.S.Associates for R1 Mr.S.Gopinathan for R2ORDERThis review application is filed by the respondents No.1 and 2 in the writ petition seeking review of the order dated 08.03.20...


Mar 30 2026

Pugazendhi Vs Masilamani alias Bhoobalan,

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

C.M.P.No.7854 of 2026 in A.S.(SR) No.107569 of 2023C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J., AND K.RAJASEKAR.J., This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 767 days in paying the deficit Court fee in the above appeal. 2.Taking note of the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay is condoned. Accordingly, this petition is allowed. 3.The Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order.[C.V.K.,J.] [K.R.S.,J.] 30.03.2026 gpa 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


Mar 30 2026

M/S BLD Design Studio Vs Union Of India

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 30.03.2026Coram:THE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED C.M.P.No.4893 of 2026 in W.A.S.R.No.205059 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.4895 of 2026 in W.A.S.R.No.205055 of 2025 --- M/s.BLD Design Studio, Rep. By its Proprietorship: Ramesh Tamilmani, No.21/4, 77/4, 31st Cross Street, Besant Nagar, Kamaraj Nagar, Chennai-600 090. .. Petitioner in both petitions Vs.1. Union of India, Rep. By the Secretary to Govt. of India, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi-110 001.2. The Director, Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, 1st Floor Tower NBCC Plaza -1 Sector 5 Pushp Vihar, New Delhi-110 017.3. The State Tax Officer, Kotturpuram Assessment Circle, Integrated Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Nandanam, Chennai-600 035. .. Respondents in both petitions Page No.1/5Civil Miscellaneous Petition No.4893 of 2026 is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 153 days in filing W.A.S.R...


Mar 30 2026

K.Buvaneswari Vs J.Jegajothi

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 15.04.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI and C.M.P.Nos.1411 and 5759 of 2026K.Buvaneswari rep. By her General Power of Attorney Ms.K.Gajalakshmi st ... Appellant/1 Respondent/ Plaintiff Vs. 1.J.Jegajothi 2.J.Selva Prakash 3.M.Selvi 4.Minor.M.Logesh (Minor rep. by mother and natural guardian M.Selvi) ... Respondents1-4 /Petitioners / Defendants 1 to 4 5.A.Kalavathi 6.A.Meenakshi 7.K.Narmatha alias Asha 8.Senthil Kumar 9.Manimegalai ... Respondents5-9 /Petitioners / Defendants 6 to 10 10.Saravanan 11.Mala12.Devi 13.Jamuna ... Respondents 10-13/Petitioners / Defendants 11-13 th th 14.N.Subramani ... 14 Respondent /Petitioners /20 Defendant th th 15.S.Varalakshmi ... 15 Respondent /Respondent/5 Defendant 16.Manjula 17.T.Sundaramoorthy 18.Vimala ...Respondents 16-18 /Respondents/ Defendants11-13 Palaniappan (Died) Pushpa (Died) ...Respondents /Respondents/ Defendants 18&19 19.The District Collector, Chengalpattu District, Chenga...


Mar 30 2026

M/S.Ramaniyam Real Estates (P) Ltd. vs the Managing Director

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.No.1480 of 20241. M/s.Ramaniyam Real Estates (P) Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director, Mr.V..Jaggannathan, Gandhi Nagar, Adyar, Chennai 600 020.2. A.L.Narasimhan3. P.V.Ignatious4. M.Dilli ... Petitioners(Petitioners 2 to 4 represented by their power agent represented by its Authorised Signatory, Mr.M.Chandru, 14/67, 3rd Main Road, Gandhi Nagar, Adyar, Chennai 600 020.) Vs.1. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, CMDA Complex, E & C Market Road, Koyambedu, Chennai 600 107.2. The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu Natarajan Maaligai, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008.3. The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Building, Chennai 600 009.4. The Managing Director, CMWSSB, No.1, Pumping Station Road, Chindaripet, Chennai 600 002.5. The Assistant Engineer, Area No.228, Ashok Nagar West, TAN...


Mar 30 2026

A.Whenseslaus vs the Chairman Cum Managing

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-30-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on : 25.03.2026Pronounced on : 30.03.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR and MP.No.1 of 2011 A.Whenseslaus Ex-Industrial Worker, S/o.Arumaidoss, 13H, Hostel Type, Block-10, Neyveli. ... Petitioner vs1. The Chairman cum Managing Director, Neyveli Lignite Corporation, Neyveli.2. The Chief Manager (Transport) Bus Service Neyveli Lignite Corporation, Neyveli.3. The Additional Chief Manager/ Bus Service, Neyveli Lignite Corporation, Neyveli.4. The Managing Director, NLC Indcodserve, Neyveli. RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records in pursuant to the rejection order issued by the second respondent vide Memo No.530/CM/Tr/Bus/DA/2007-7 dated 24.05.2011 and the punishment order issued by the third respondent vide Memo No.530/ACM/Bus/DA/2007-5 dated 11.08.2008 and quash the same and direct the resp...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial