Chennai Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
ANBARASAN Vs The Additional Chief Secretary,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR Anbarasan ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Additional Chief Secretary, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Government of Tamilnadu, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.2. The Director General of Police, Head Office of Police Department, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004.3. The Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri-635 002.4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thinnur, Denkanikottai Road, Hosur-635 109.5. The Inspector of Police, Town Police Station,6. The Inspector of Police,Bagalur Police Station, ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition (Criminal) is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to take immediate legal action against the respondents 5 and 6 as per Section 4 of Page1 of 6 SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 based on the petitioners representation dated 08.01.2026 within a tim...
Vijaya Krishnan Vs Prema Krishnamoorthy and 2 others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
On 18.03.2026, the petitioner was permitted to file an application for substituted service on the 1st respondent on the ground that the petitioner was unable to serve notice at the last known address and could not ascertain any other address. The present application is pursuant thereto.2. Upon examining the affidavit in support of this application andnoticing that the notice issued on 05.01.2026 was returned 'unserved', this application is allowed as prayed for. Consequently, the petitioners are directed to effect substituted service by publication in one issue of the Tamil daily "Dhina Thanthi" specifying the next date of hearing as 06.04.2026.3. List the matter on 06.04.2026. dpq dpq...
SenthilKumar Vs State rep. by its
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN SenthilKumar ..Petitioner Vs State rep. by its The Inspector of Police, CBCID - Krishnagiri, Krishnagiri District. Crime No.1 of 2026 ..Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under section 482 of BNSS to enlarge the Petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.1 of 2026, on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner: Mr.Camyles Gandhi W For Respondent: Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 120(B), 170, 419, 420, 468 and 471 of IPC corresponding under section 61, 204, 319(2), 318, 336, 340 of BNS in Crime No.1 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has illegally exonerated money by giving fake RBI documents and cheated the de facto Page1 of 3 complainant. Hence, this case.3. The learned counsel...
A.Chandrababu Vs D.C.Donie Prasad
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR A.Chandrababu ..Petitioner Vs D.C.Donie Prasad ..Respondents To set aside the order passed by the Principal District and Sessions Court, at Chengalpet in Crl.MP.No.1322/2025 in Crl.A.57/2025 dated 22.07.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Pugalendhi for Mr.D.RajaORDERThe petitioner/accused was convicted by the trial court in STC.No.29 of 2023 on 10.03.2025. The petitioner preferred an appeal in Crl.A.No.52 of 2025 and a suspension of sentence petition in Crl.M.P.No.1322 of 2025. The learned Sessions Judge by order dated 05.06.2025 admitted the appeal and suspended the sentence of the petitioner by imposing conditions. One such condition was that the petitioner to deposit 20% of the compensation amount i.e., Rs.2,40,000/- within a period of one month from 05.06.2025. Thereafter, thePage1 of 4petitioner had filed another petition in Crl.M.P.No.2048 of 2025 seeking extension for a further pe...
K.PONNAIYA Vs The Principal secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WP No. 11404 of 2026 & W.M.P.Nos.12637, 12638, 12875 of 20261. K.Ponnaiya S/O.Kannimuthu Door No.25, Plot No.292, 295, 4th cross street, Indira Nagar, Virugambakkam Chennai-600 0922. Kannammal W/o.Murugan Door No.25A, Plot No.291 4th cross street, Indira Nagar Virugambakkam Chennai-600 092 ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Principal secretary Tamilnadu Housing and Urban Developments2. The Managing Director No.5, Kamarajar salai, Chepauk3. The Executive Engineer Division-VI, K.K.Nagar, Page1 of 54. The Surveyor Tamilnadu Urban Habital Development Board, Alaiyamman Koil shopping complex, Teynampet, Chennai-600 0185. Noorul Gasali Door No.33, Indira Nagar 4th cross street Virugambakkam, Chennai-600 092 ..Respondent(s)Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for an issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the allot...
B.Murali vs the State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA and W.M.P.No.12609 of 2026 B.Murali S/o.K.T.Belli, 2-468, Anikorai (Post and Village) The Nilgiris Dist- 643 206. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Fort.St.George, Chennai-09.2. The Director of Elementary Education O/o.The Director of Elementary Education, College Road,Chennai-06.3. The Financial Advisor and the Principal Accounts Officer Directorate of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai-06.4. The District Educational Officer (Elementary) O/o.The District Educational Office (Elementary) Otakamund, The Nilgiris District.5. The Block Educational Officer O/o.The Block Educational office, Coonnor, The Nilgiris District. Page1 of 86. The Secretary Government Aided Primary School Melsingara,Singara Estate, Coonnor The Nilgiris District- 643 101. ..Respondent(s)PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution...
A.VINDHAN Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR and CRL.MP.Nos.4317 and 4320 of 2026 A.Vindhan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by Inspector of Police, Washermanpet, Chennai - 600 021. (Crime No.244 of 2022) 2.Thiyagarajan GRI 40289 Chennai - 600 021. ..Respondent(s) To call for the records in C.C.No.788 of 2022 on the file of learned XV Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai in Crime No.244 of 2022 on the file of the H-1-Washermanpet Police Station, Chennai and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Magimai RajFor Respondent(s): M/S. LEONARD ARUL JOSEPH SELVAM ADDITIONAL PP FOR R1 Page1 of 5ORDERThe petitioner, who is facing trial in C.C.No.788 of 2022 for the offence under Sections 143, 294(b), 267, 506(i) IPC, filed the present quash petition seeking to quash the proceedings.2. The case of the prosecution is that, on the night intervening between29.03.2022 and 30.03.2022 at about 12.30 a.m., when the ...
Franklin Vs The Tahsildar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR Franklin S/o. Mariaprakasam, No.164, New Colony, Munnur Village, Villupuram, Tindivanam Taluk - 604 301. ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s)Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to return the Non Registration vehicle only loading and unloading purpose JCP vide Invoice No.2011110599, Engine No.H00297710 and Chasis No.PUNJD13CPM2928283 and Model 2021 and another Non Registration Vehicle only loading and unloading purpose and Invoice No.1012119676 and dated of purchase 31.01.2022 Sany Hydraulic Crawler Excavator Sy 240C912K, Serial No.(22SY2401000071) to the petitioner within such time as may be stipulated by this Honble court.Page1 of 4 For Petitioner(s): G.D.Sendillveal For Respondent(s): M/S. LEONARD ARUL JOSEPH SELVAM ADDITIONAL PP for R2ORDERWhen the matter is taken up today, t...
Tvl.SRI SAI MURUGAN CONDUCTORS Vs The Assistant Commissioner
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and W.M.P. Nos.13069 & 13070 of 2026 Tvl.SRI SAI MURUGAN CONDUCTORS Represented by its Partner Mr PALANI, Mettur, Salem, Tamil Nadu-636 402. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Assistant Commissioner Mettur, Salem-II Salem, Tamil Nadu-636 402.2. Tamilnadu Merchantile Bank Ltd.,Rep. by its Senior Manager, 61, Armuga Achari Street, Dharmapuri, Tamil Nadu-636701. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the impugned order in form GST DRC-07 under Section 73 of the TNGST Act, 2017, for the assessment period 2022-2023, with Ref. No.ZD330925194445Z - Office of Assistant Commissioner Mettur Salem-II, dated 17.09.2025, issued by the Respondent herein uploaded along with the summary of the order, quash the same and direct the Respondent to pass a fresh order after providin...
Mohammed Yasin Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-03-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR and CRL MP No.5688 of 2026 Mohammed Yasin Petitioner(s) Vs 2.L.Mugunthan The Sub Inspector of Police, Respondent(s)PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to call for the entire records in Cr.No.417/2025, pending on the file of the respondent police and quash the same as illegal, incompetent, arbitrary and against the nature of Justice and pass as such further or other orders as this Court may deem fit for the circumstance of the case and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.R.Gokulvisvas For Respondent(s): Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Additional Public ProsecutorORDERChallenging the impugned FIR in Crime No.417 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 278, 123 & 132 of BNSS pending on the file of the respondent police, the petitioner has filed the present petition.2. Today, when the matter was taken up for consideration, Mr.Leonard...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »