Chennai Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
BABU Vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Babu S/o.Duraisamy, F.No.3, Velle Gounder Lane, Vettaikaranpudur, Pollachi, Coimbatore - 642 129. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,2. Umamaheshwari W/o.Babu, manika aasari sandhu, parai veethi, vettaikaranpudur, pollachi, coimbatore - 642 129. Cr.No.193/2014 ..Respondent(s)To dispense with the original order copy of the judgement in S.C.No.144 of 2016 on the file of Assistant Sessions Judge Pollachi dated For Petitioner(s): S.NIRMAL ADITYA For Respondent(s): MR.R.VINOTHRAJA GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE(CRIMINAL SIDE) FOR R1 Page1 of 3ORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to dispense with the production of the original order copy of the judgment in S.C.No.144 of 2016 passed by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge Pollachi, dated 13.11.2019.2. This Petition stands ordered. ANU To1. The Inspector of Police, Page2 of 3SUNDER MOHAN, J.ANU Page3 of 3...
B.Sreenivasan Vs Mr. N.Nandhagopal,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR B.Seenivasan, Electrician C, Yedakkadu, The Nilgiris 643 209. ..Petitioner Vs Mr.N.Nandhagopal The Managing Director, Edakkadu, The Nilgiris 643 209, Yedakad. ..Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971to punish the respondent for his deliberate and wilful disobedience of the orderdated 27.09.2023 passed in W.P.No.21994 of 2021 by this Court. For Petitioner: Mr.K.Lavan For Respondent: Mrs.E.Ranganayagi Additional Government Pleader Page1 of 5ORDERThis contempt petition is filed for not complying with the order dated 27.09.2023 in W.P.No.21994 of 2021, whereby, this Court had directed the respondent to give effect to the appointment order passed by the third respondent vide his proceedings in R.C.No.7/2017-18 dated 11.11.2020, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.2. The copy of the aforesaid...
C.Ganesan Vs Mr. N.Nandhagopal,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR C.Ganesan, Assistant Tea Maker, (i/c) Yedakkadu, The Nilgiris 643 209. ..Petitioner Vs Mr.N.Nandhagopal The Managing Director, Edakkadu, The Nilgiris 643 209, Yedakad. ..Respondent PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971to punish the respondent for his deliberate and wilful disobedience of the orderdated 27.09.2023 passed in W.P.No.21991 of 2021 by this Court. For Petitioner: Mr.K.Lavan For Respondent: Mr.V.Umakanth Government AdvocateORDERThis contempt petition is filed for not complying with the order dated 27.09.2023 in W.P.No.21991 of 2021, whereby, this Court had directed the respondent to give effect to the appointment order passed by the third respondent vide his proceedings in R.C.No.7/2017-18 dated 11.11.2020, within Page1 of 5 a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.2. The copy of the aforesaid ord...
The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police Vs VICKY @ VIGNESHWARAN
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
Crl.M.P.No.772 of 2026 in Crl.A.SR.No.102957 of 2025SUNDER MOHAN, J.This petition is filed to condone the delay of 296 days in filing the Appeal against the acquittal judgment passed in Sessions Case No.93 of 2022, dated 10.01.2025 on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Cuddalore.2. Though notice has been served on the respondents 1 to 3, and their names have been printed in the cause list, none appeared on their behalf.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay stands condoned and the petition is ordered. 27.02.2026 Anu Note: Registry is directed to number this Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order. 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
JANAKIRAMAN Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
inIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN in Janakiraman ... PetitionerVersusState Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Gingee Police Station, Villupuram District, Crime No.168 of 2023. ... Respondent Prayer : Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 430 of BNSS/389(1) Cr.P.C., seeking to suspend the sentence and conviction imposed against the petitioner by judgment dated 10.11.2025 in S.C.No.01 of 2025 passed by the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tindivanam and enlarge the petitioner on bail till the disposal of the above Criminal Appeal. in For Petitioner : Mr.V.R.Appaswamee For Respondent : Mr.A.Damodaran Additional Public ProsecutorORDER(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN, J.) This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner/A1 seeking to suspend the sentence and conviction imposed on him in S.C.No.01 of 2025, dated 10.11.2...
The Managing Director Vs T. Nagarajan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 27.02.2026CORAM:THE HONBLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI C.M.A.No.481 of 2026 and C.M.P.No.5772 of 2026 The Managing Director, Metropolitan Transport Corporation Ltd., (M.T.C. (Chennai) Ltd.) No.2, Pallavan House, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002. ...AppellantVersus1.T.Nagarajan 2.N.Pushpadevi ...Respondents This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of theMotor Vehicles Act, 1988 praying to set aside the Decree and Judgmentdated 16.02.2024 made in M.C.O.P.No.863 of 2021 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chief Judge Court of Small Causes, Chennai pending and be pleased to dismiss the above claim as against the appellant. For Appellant : Mr.M.Murali Vinodh For Respondents : Mr.K.BalajiJUDGMENTThis Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been preferred by the Appellant/Transport Corporation praying to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 16.02.2024 in M.C.O.P.No.863 of 2021 passed by the learned Chief Judge,...
P. Sureshbabu and Another Vs Mr. K. Elangovan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
Sub.A(OS).No.215 of 2026 in Cont P.DR.No.196671 of 2025 HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J., This Sub Application has been filed seeking leave of this Court to file contempt petition for the wilful disobedience of the order dated 21.11.2019 made in W.P.No.32746 of 2016.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent.3. Considering the submissions made and on perusal of the materials available on record, this Court is satisfied that sufficient grounds have been made out for granting leave.4. Accordingly, leave is granted. The Sub application stands allowed. 27.02.2026 mk https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
G.R.Ravichandran Vs S.Ravichandran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA G.R.Ravichandran S/o.G.Ranganathan, No.9/7, Sivan St, Rajaji Nagar East, Villivakkam, Chennai 600 049 ..Petitioner(s) Vs S.Ravichandran ..Contemnor(s) Prayer: This Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying to punish the respondent herein for disobeying the direction of this Court passed in W.P.No.2236 of 2025 dated 29.01.2025. For Petitioner(s): Ms.A.Sonal For Contemnor(s): Mr.T.K.Saravanan, Additional Government Pleader Page1 of 3OrderThe Contempt Petition has been filed seeking to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.2236 of 2025 dated 29.01.2025.2. It is informed that the orders of this Court in W.P.No.2236 of 2025 dated 29.01.2025 has been complied with by way of the proceedings of the respondent dated 23.02.20263. Recording the above statement, the contempt petition is closed. Index: Yes/NoS...
Chandra Kumar vs State, Rep. by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NOS.35568 of 2025 and 2605 of 2026 Chandra Kumar ... Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.35568 of 2025/ A3 Muthuvel Pandi ... Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.2605 of 2026/ A1 Vs The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, PEW, Pallikaranai Police Station. Crime No.267 of 2024. ... Respondent/ Complainant Prayer: Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant bail to the petitioners/ accused in C.C.No.516 of 2025 on the file of the II Additional Special Judge, Special Court under EC and NDPS Act, Chennai. For Petitioners : Mr. S. Karthikeyan For Mr. K. Subburaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. A. Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side) *******COMMON ORDERThe petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 28.10.2024 for the offences under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(C), 25 and 29(1) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act...
State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Nib - Cid Vs A. Ajithku ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
inN.MALA, J.The above petition is filed by the State, to condone the delay of 270 days in preferring the above criminal appeal, against the judgment dated 09.12.2024, in CC.No.178/2023, by the learned Sessions Judge/Presiding Officer, Special Court for EC and NDPS Act Cases, Pudukottai. 2.The petitioner/State, in the affidavit filed in support of the petition averred that due to administrative process, there was a delay of 270 days in preferring the appeal. The petitioner states that the delay is neither willful nor wanton, but due to the aforesaid reason. The petitioner, therefore prays for condonation of the delay. 3.Though the respondents 1 and 2 are represented by counsel, there is no appearance. Mr.S.Kasirajan, learned counsel appears for the 3rd respondent. Though notice was served on respondents 4 to 6 and their names are printed in cause list, they have not appeared either in person or through counsel.4.The learned counsel for the 3rd respondent submits that he has no objection...
- ‹ Prev
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- Next ›
- Last »