Skip to content

Chennai Court February 2026 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Feb 27 2026

P.M. Alphonse, vs Thiru. S.Kannappan and 2 Others

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-27-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR P.M.Alphonse S/o. Maghimaidoss, B.T.Assistant (Maths), V.K.R.T.Government Higher Secondary School, Thiruvathur 603 312 Cheyyar Taluk, Chengalpet District. ... Petitioner vs Chengalpet District. Respondents Prayer: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for willfully disobeying the orders passed in the writ petition in W.P.No.3761 of 2023 dated 10.01.2025 and to pass orders. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Nedunchezhiyan For Respondent : Mrs.A.Bakkiyalakshmi Government AdvocateORDERWhen the contempt petition is taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that the respondents have complied with the order of this Court dated 10.01.2025 in W.P.No.3761 of 2023.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid submission made by the learned Government ...


Feb 27 2026

V.S.Srinivasan Vs Dr.B.Chandramohan, I.A.S. and 3 others

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Feb-27-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN and Sub Appln. No.292 of 2026 V.S.Srinivasan ..Petitioner Vs ..Contemnors Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents for wilful disobdience of the order of this Hon'ble Court rendered in W.P.No.10888 of 2025 dated 07.04.2025. For Petitioner: M R.Saseetharan For Contemnors: Ms.P.Rajarajeswari, Govt. Advocate Page1 of 4ORDERIn compliance of the statutory notice issued, Thiru.S.Kannappan, Director of School Education, Chennai, Thiru.Jayakumar, Joint Director of School Education (Vocational) Chennai, Ms.Sathyabama Chief Educational officer (In Charge) Chennai District are present before this court.2. A copy of the Government Order in G.O.(2D) No.17 School Education (Pa.Ka.(1) Department dated 26.02.2026 had been forwarded in compliance of the directions of this court.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, states that...


Feb 27 2026

M.BABU Vs Venkatesh

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Feb-27-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR M.Babu ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Venkatesh2. Manjula3. Senthilkumar..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India praying to set aside the Docket sheet order dated 13.11.2025 made in unnumbered Filing SR No. OS/843/2025 in CNR.No.TNKI010031442025 on the file of Principal District Judge at Krishnagiri For Petitioner(s): M/s.T.SundaravadanamORDERThe learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the civil revision petition. He also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle. Page1 of 32. In view of the endorsement and submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this civil revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/No nr To The Principal District Judge at Krishnagiri Page2 of 3S.SOUNTHAR, J.nr Page3 o...


Feb 27 2026

M/S Vijay India Construction vs Union of India Rep by

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-27-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH M/s.Vijay India Construction, Rep. By its Managing Partner, V.Gunasekaran, Residing at C-8, Kottur Villa, No.5, Lock Street, Kotturpuram, Chennai 600 085. ..Applicant Vs.1. Union of India, rep. By The Chief Engineer, Military Engineering Services, Madras Zone, Island Gounds, Chennai 600 009.2. The Chief Manager, State Bank of India, Park Town Branch, Evening Bazaar Road, Chennai 600 003. RespondentsPRAYER: Application filed under Order XIV Rule 12 of O.S. Rules, to set aside the order dated 26.11.2025 passed in E.P.No.107 of 2018 by the learned Master, Madras, High Court of Judicature. For Applicant : Mr.A.K.Sriram, Senior Counsel assisted by Ms.Aishwarya Prakash For Respondents : Mr.M.Karthikeyan Central Govt. Standing Counsel [R1] Mr.C.Mohan Ms.Rexy Josephine Mary for M/s.King & Partridge [R2]ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Central Govern...


Feb 27 2026

C.Santhosh Vs V.Dinakaran

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-27-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on: 23.02.2026 Pronounced on: 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI CRP. No.6575 of 2025 and CMP. No.32538 of 2025 C.Santhosh Petitioner(s) Vs V.Dinakaran Respondent(s) PRAYER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 25.09.2025 passed in RLTA. No.193 of 2024 by the learned XVIII Additional City Civil Judge, Chennai, confirming the order dated 13.09.2024, passed in RLTOP No.281 of 2023 by the XII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai.For Petitioner : Mr.N.Srinivas For Respondents : Mr.T.N.Rangesh KannaORDERThe petitioner/tenant, who has suffered concurrently before the Rent Court as well as the Rent Tribunal is the petitioner herein.2. I have heard Mr.N.Srinivas, learned counsel for the revision petitioner/tenant and Mr.T.N.Rangesh Khanna, learned counsel for the respondent/landlord.3. Mr.N.Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitio...


Feb 27 2026

Vennila, Vs Mr. P.Sukumar, B.Sc.,

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Feb-27-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Vennila, W/o.Late Suresh ..Petitioner Vs. Mr.P.Sukumar B.Sc., The Sub Collector/Revenue Divisional Officer, Mettur Revenue Division, Metter Dam 1, Salem District. Respondent PRAYER: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for disobedience of this Honble High Court Order dated 04.07.2025 made in W.P.No.3979 of 2025. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Elayathamizhan For Respondent : Mr.Abhishekmurthy Government Advocate *****N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.mpORDERThis contempt petition has been filed for the alleged disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.3979 of 2025 dated 04.07.2025.2. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, learned counselappearing on either side submitted that the order passed by this Court has been complied with and the relevant copy of the destitute widow certificate was also placed before this ...


Feb 27 2026

KUMAR Vs State Rep. by Inspector of Police

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-27-2026

inIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in Kumar ..Petitioner Vs. State rep by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Palladam. (Crime No. 13 of 2021) ..RespondentPRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 430(1) of BNSS praying to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner by judgment dated 06.11.2023 passed in Spl.S.C. No. 71 of 2022 by the Magalir Neethimandram, (Fast Track Mahila Court), Tiruppur and release the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the above appeal. For Petitioner :: Ms.S. Valarmathi For Respondent :: Mr.S. Balaji, Govt. Addvocate (Crl.Side)inORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner by judgment dated 06.11.2023 passed in Spl.S.C.No.71/2022 by the Magalir Neethimandram, (Fast Track Mahila Court), Tiruppur, pending disposal of the above criminal appeal and enlarge the petitioner on bail.2. The petit...


Feb 27 2026

Mohala Vs Veeraraghavan

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-27-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CRP No. 499 of 2026 and CMP No.2725 of 20261. Mohala, W/o.Bhaskar Jaisingh, No.2, Ellaiamman Koil Street, Link Road, Panruti, Panruti Taluk.2. Chitra, D/o.Rajaram Singh, No.2, Ellaiamman Koil Street, Link Road, Panruti, Panruti Taluk. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Veeraraghavan, S/o.Muthal Chettiar, No.8, 2nd Street, Police Line,2. M.Siva, S/o.Manicka Mudhaliyar, No.6/4, Muthiah Nagar, Kokkupalayam Road, Thattanchavadi, Page1 of 53. Rani, W/o.Siva, No.6/4, Muthiah Nagar, Kokkupalayam Road, Thattanchavadi, ..Respondent(s)Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to aside the Order dated 02.12.2025 passed in I.A.No.42 of 2019 in AS.No.20 of 2017 in O.S.No.424/2004, on the file of Subordinate Judge, Panruti. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Munusami For Respondent(s) : Mr.N.Palanikumar for R2 and R3 for M/s.P.Kannan kumarORDERThis Civil Revision Petition has been fil...


Feb 27 2026

V.K.Vijayakumaran Vs V.K.Hemachandran and 4 others

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-27-2026

A.No.336 of 2026 in O.P No.65 of 2025 27.02.2026ORDER1. This application is filed by the applicant to condone the delay of 49 days in filing the supporting affidavit in caveat.2. Heard the counsel for the applicant. No counter has been filed by therespondent. On perusal of the records, it is seen from the endorsement made by the Registry that the caveat petition was filed on 09.10.2025 and the supporting affidavit was filed on 05.12.2025.3. As per Order XXV, Rule 52 of the Madras High Court Original Side Rules,where a caveat has been entered after an application has been made for grant of probate or letters of administration, the affidavit in support of the caveat shall be filed within 8 days of the caveat being filed. In this regard this court obliges to refer the decision in C.T.Ramasamy Vs-- S.P.Kaveri Aachi, 2002 (4) Law Weekly 681 Madras (DB) wherein it is held that As necessary affidavit was not filed in time, the application to condone the delay of 229 days was filed and allowed...


Feb 27 2026

Nazneen Begum., Vs Mr. Kareem Ahamed.,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-27-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL in CS No.531 of 20181. Nazneen Begum., W/o. Late Shameem Ahamed, No.18, P.V. Lane, 1st Flr, M.K. Garden, Chennai - 1. and 4 Others2. Shabbir Ahamed., S/o. Late Shameem Ahamed, No.18, P.V. Lane, I Flr, M.K., Garden, Chennai - 1.3. Mohammed Ghouse Basha., S/o. Late Shameem Ahamed, No.18, P.V. Lane, Ground Flr, M.K. Garden, Chennai - 1.4. Mrs. Mumtaz Begum., D/o. Late Shameem Ahamed, W/o. Abdul Gaffar Residing, No.2, 5th Lane, Jani Jahan Khan St, Royapettah, Chennai - 14.5. Ruksana., D/o. Late Shameem Ahamed, W/o. Mohammed Munavar, No.119, Savarayalu St, Pondicherry - 605001. Applicant(s) Vs1. Mr. Kareem Ahamed.,S/o Late D.K.Hussain, No. 18, 2nd 2.Shukoor Ahamed., S/o. Late D.K.H ussain, No.18, 3rd and 4th Flr, P.V. Lane, M.K. Garden, Chennai - 1 3.Mr. Abdul Jabbar., S/o. H. Kareem Ahamed, No. 18, 2nd 4.Mr. Mohammed Kassim., S/o. Shukoor Ahamed, NO. 18, 3rd 5.LIC Housing Finance Ltd., Rep ...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial