Chennai Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Keerthana Rajalingam Vs The Inspector General of Registration
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY Keerthana Rajalingam .. Petitioner vs 3.Revathi Rajalingam .. RespondentsPetition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to refusal check slip bearing Refusal No.RFL/MYLAPORE48/2025 dated 17.09.2025 issued by the second respondent and quash the same as being illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of law and consequently direct the second respondent to register the settlement deed dated 17.09.2025 executed between the petitioner and the third respondent herein.For Petitioner : Ms.Priyanka R For Respondent : Mr.U.Baranidharan, Special Government Pleader for R1 and R2 Mr.U.Venkatesh for R3ORDERA partition suit was filed by one R.Ravindran against the petitioner, the third respondent and one Ms.Anitha Sharmila. Said suit was decreed on 15.11.2016 in terms of a...
MURUGAN Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in Murugan S/o.Ramalingam, No.34, Pillaiyar Koil Street, Kilkarikathur Village, Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Cr.No.1/2023. ..Respondent(s) Murugan S/o.Ramalingam, No.34, Pillaiyar Koil Street, Kilkarikathur Village, Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. ..Appellant(s) Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police,Cr.No.1/2023. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: To modify condition in Para no.7(d) imposed in the order dt. 15.10.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No. 19127/2025 in Crl.A.No. 916/2025 in the interest of justice and thus render justice. Prayer: To set aside the conviction and sentence made in Spl.SC No.20/2023 on the file of the Honble Sessions Judge, Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Tiruvannamalai dated 28.05.2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.M.Basil For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate(c...
VENKADESH Vs The state of Tamilnadu rep.by,The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA1. Venkadesh2. Gowtharan @ Gowsik3. Aravind4. Selvam5. Mathiyalagan @ Mathi6. Elumalai7. Shanmuga Prabhu8. Bharathidasan ... Petitioners Vs.1. The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by, The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.324 of 2025)2. Dinesh ... RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, pleased to call for the records of the impugned First Information Report in Crime No.324 of 2025 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Siva Kumar For R1 : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Criminal Side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.324 of 2025, pending on the file of the first respondent Police.2. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learnedGovernment Advocate (Criminal Side) appe...
T.Arularasu Vs The Director of School Education
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI W.P. No.4377 of 2026 and WMP.No.4862 & 4863 of 2026 T.Arularasu Petitioner VsThiruvannamalai ...Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the respondents in relation to the proceedings issued in Rc.No.11243/B1/2025 dated 16.10.2025 issued by the 2nd respondent and quash the same and issue a consequential direction to the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with service and monetary benefitsFor Petitioner : Mr.R.Saseetharan For Respondents : Mrs.Mythreye Chandru, Special Government PleaderORDERThis writ petition has been filed praying to quash the proceedings issued in Rc.No.11243/B1/2025 dated 16.10.2025 by the 2nd respondent and consequently to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with service and monetary benefits2. The petitio...
M.Prabhu Vs The Directorate of School Education,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No. 3414 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.3842 and 3843 of 2026 M.Prabhu ...Petitioner Vs.1. 1. The Director of School Education, 2 2. The Joint Director of School Education (Higher Secondary), 3.The Chairman, Teacher Recruitment Board, 3rd and 4th Floor, Puratchi Thalaivar Dr.M.G.R.Centenary Building, DPI Campus, College Road, 2. ..RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned ineligible list of candidates after CV for the subject Page1 of 7Commerce in No.Nil dated 22.01.2026 issued by the third respondent and the subsequent impugned provisional selection list for the subject Commerce in No.Nil dated 22.01.2026 issued by the third respondent and to quash the same insofar as not considering the petitioner for selection is concerned and consequentl...
V.Rajamanickam Vs The District Registrar (Salem West)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY V.Rajamanickam ..Petitioner(s) Vs Sankari Taluk, Salem District ..Respondent(s)Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd Respondent S.R.O Magudanchavadi, Salem District to accept the sale Deed dated 08.11.2025 presented for registration vide Pre-Registration token Receipt No.TP/238805794/2025 dated 08.11.2025 by considering the petitioners Representation dated 11.11.2025, within a stipulated time fixed by this Court.For Petitioner(s) : Mr.N.Vijaya Basker For Respondent(s) : Mr.Stalin Abimanyu, Additional Government Pleader Page1 of 4ORDERAsserting title under sale deed dated 03.09.2004, the legatees thereunder, namely M.Govindan and M.Mani, executed a sale deed in favour of the petitioner. Upon being presented for registration, it is stated that the registering officer neither registered ...
M.S.Shanmugam Vs Balakumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
C.M.P.No.5684 of 2026 in C.R.P.SR.No.15780 of 2026P.B.BALAJI, J.Dispensed with for the present. 26.02.2026 pvs Note: Registry is directed to number the civil revision petition, if it is otherwise in order and post the matter on 27.02.2026, under the caption For Admission. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
V.Palanisamy Vs The district collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA V.Palanisamy ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The District collector Coimbatore Collectorate Office,2. The District Revenue Officer District Collectorate Office,3. The Chief Engineer Coimbatore Region, Coimbatore.4. The Tahsildar Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore District-642 001.5. The Superintending Engineer6. The Executive Engineer Page1 of 77. The Assistant Engineer8. The Block Development Officer Pollachi North Block, Pollachi North Block Office, Pollachi- 642 001.9. D.Siddarth ..Respondent(s)PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents 1 to 8 to remove the pipelines illegally laid by the 9 th respondent beneath the Mulanur- Kondegoundenpalayam Road in S.F.No.32 situated at Mulanur Village, Pollachi Taluk within the time frame fixed by this court and consequently, restrain the 9 th respondent from...
G.Jaisankar Vs G.Sivakumar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24.04.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI &CMP.No.1614 of 2026 1.G.Jaisankar Appellant(s) 2.Rekha Vs G.Sivakumar Respondent(s) Prayer: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of CPC, to set aside the order and decreetalorder passed in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in O.S.No.218 of 2018 on the file of the AdditionalDistrict Judge II, Poonamallee dated 08.02.2023. For Appellant(s): Mr.Adinarayana Rao For Respondent(s): Mr.S.SwaminathanORDERIt appears that the Registry has raised an objection with regard to the 1 st appellant not being a signatory to the Joint Memorandum of Compromise and also non payment of applicable non-judicial stamp/Court fees and also on the ground that in view of the above clarification that was sought for, the time for drafting the final decree has also lapsed. Hence, the matter has been posted for clarification.2. It is also brought to my notice by Mr.Adinarayana Rao, as well asMr.S.Swaminathan, learned counsel appeari...
MANIKANDAN Vs The State Rep. by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Manikandan ... Petitioner Vs. The State rep by Inspector of Police, (Crime No.454 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.454 of 2025 on the file of respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Hasnah For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERToday, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sma To1. The Inspector of Police, 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.K.RAJASEKAR, J.sma...
- ‹ Prev
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- Next ›
- Last »