Chennai Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V.Sivaraman vs the Registrar, T.N. Land
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
2026:MHC:924IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN AND WPMP NO. 10890 OF 20021. V.Sivaraman 2.Selvakumari 3.Tmt.Balambal Ammal Ammal 4.Vasanthakumari 5.Sivasankaran 6.Sivakumar Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Registrar, T.N. LandReforms Special Appellate Tribunal, Santhome, Chennai.4 2.The District Revenue Officer Land Tribunal Chennai.5. 3.The Assistant Commissioner (land Reforms), Villupuram. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District. (R4 Impleaded As Per Order Dt In Wp.7954/2002 By RPSJ & RPAJ) Respondent(s)PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the 1 st respondent in SRP No.39 of 2000 dated 13.08.2001 and consequently confirm the order of the 2nd respondent dated 30.04.1999 in LT CMA.No.28/1998. For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.K.Vijayaraghavan for Mr.S.Ud...
Mrs. Sudha Guru Vs Nil
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Mrs. Sudha Guru D/o.Late S.N.Krishnan, Residing at Door No.35, Plot No.3723, Q-6, 6th Avenue, Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040. ..Applicant(s) Vs Nil nil ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The application has been filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of the Original Side Rules read with Order XXXI Rule 9 of Original Side Rules and Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure praying to permit the Applicant/Petitioner Sudha Krishnan earlier known as Sudha Guru to withdraw the sum of Rs.83,13,000/- with accrued interest lying in Court Deposit, mentioned in the Schedule hereunder. For Applicant(s): MR.K.J.S. PremkumarORDERThis application has been filed by the applicant seeking to permit the applicant namely Sudha Krishnan earlier known as Sudha Guru to withdraw a sum of Rs.83,13,000/- with accrued interest lying in Court deposit. Page1 of 42. According to the applicant, she had filed the above main originalpetition ...
Shankar Karikar Vs IDBI Bank Ltd
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY in C.S.(Comm. Div) No.129 of 2025 Shankar Karikar S/o.Ramakrishnan,No. 24 Bawa Road Alwarpet Chennai 600018 ..Applicant(s) Vs1. IDBI Bank LtdRepresented by its Assistant General Manager Retail Asset Care, No.44/86, First Floor, Ashok Nagar, Chennai 600 083.No. 24, Bawa Road, Alwarpet, Chennai- 600 0182. IDBI Bank Ltd, represented by its Deputy General Manager, Greams Road Branch No. 37 PM Towers Greams Road Chennai 600 0063. DP Foam Private LimitedNo. 17 Flat A B Seethala Jawaharlal Nehru Street Puducherry Represented by Director Mr D.P Sarath Also at A24 26 37 40 Industrial Estate Sedarpet Pondicherry 605 1114. D.P. Sarath No. 7 Jawaharlal Nehru Street Puducherry 6055. D.P. Vasudevan No. 7 Jawaharlal Nehru Street Puducherry 605 Page1 of 6 ..Respondent(s)PRAYER: Judges summons filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S.Rules R/W Section 151 C.P.C. praying to direct the Responden...
S.M.Lakshmanan Vs Rathinakandhi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR S.M.Lakshmanan Proprietor of M/s. Muthamil Medicals, Having Shop at New No.47, Old No.33, Panchali Amman Kovil Street, Arumbakkam, Chennai-600 106. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Rathinakandhi2. T.Muthu Kumaran ..Respondent(s)PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India praying to set aside the fair and final order passed in IA.No. 6/2025 in OS.No.506/2023 dated 18.11.2025 on the file of the VI Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai. For Petitioner(s): Ma.P.Thangavel For Respondent(s): M/s.A.Sajidha Meera RumanaORDERThe civil revision petition is filed by the petitioner/plaintiff challenging the order passed by the trial court allowing the petition filed by the respondents 1 and 2 seeking dismissal of the suit as infructuous. Page1 of 42. The petitioner herein filed a suit for bare injunction restraining the respondents/defendants from interfering with his al...
Ms Plastronica Automotive Vs The Commercial Tax Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and W.M.P.No.s6478 & 6483 of 2026 M/s. Plastronica Automotive Products India Pvt Ltd. Rep by its Managing Director D Govindarajan, Plot No. 22H, TVK Industrial Estate, North Phase, Ekkattuthangal, Chennai -600 032 ..Petitioner(s) Vs.1. The Commercial Tax Officer2. The Assistant Commissioner (ST)3. The Commissioner of Commercial Tax4th Floor, Ehilagam Building, Kamarajar Road, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005 ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the proceedings of the 1st respondent in Reference No. ZD330424204728I dated 25.04.2024 and also the proceedings in Reference No. Page1 of 6ZD331224015572V dated 03.12.2024 and consequential Recovery Notices issued by the 2nd respondent in GSTIN 33AAHCP7745F1ZB/2025-26 dated 25.04.2025 and 30.10.2025 to m...
P.SELVARAJ Vs State represented by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.02.2026Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN P.Selvaraj ... Petitioner Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police, M-3 Kovilpalayam Police Station, Coimbatore District. ...Respondent Cr.No.229 of 2014Prayer: This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking suspension of For Petitioner : Mr.A.Abdul Lathif For Respondent : Mr.A.Damodaran, Addl. Public Prosecutor *******ORDER(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN, J.) This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking suspension of 2 It is seen that typed set of papers are being made ready and this Court is also inclined to take up the main appeal itself for hearing and hence this miscellaneous petition seeking suspension of sentence is closed. 3 List the appeal for hearing in the usual course. [PVJ] [MJRJ] cgi To1. III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore.2. The Inspector of Police, M-3 Kov...
K. Jayalakshmi Vs H. Krishnamurthi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE AND K. Jayalakshmi W/o. Krishnamurthy, No.2/158, Indira Gandhi St, Pudhu Nagar, Medavakkam, Perumbakkam, Chennai 100. ..Petitioner(s) Vs. H. Krishnamurthi S/o. Late. Harikrishnan, No.72, Theradi St, Kodukoor Village, Tindivanam Taluk, Villupuram Dt 605 501. ..Respondent(s)PRAYER IN TR CMP No. 101 of 2026 To pass an order to withdraw HMOP No.166/2025 pending on the file of the Honble Additional Sub Court at Tindivanam and transfer the same to the file of the Honble Sub Court at Alandur. PRAYER IN TR.CMP No. 2334 of 2026 To stay all further proceedings in HMOP No.166/2025 pending on the file of Honble Additional Sub Court at Tindivanam pending disposal of the above Tr CMP. For Petitioner(s): M/s.A.ThirumaranFor Respondent(s): No appearance. Page1 of 4OrderHeard.2. This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by thepetitioner/wife under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Pr...
Babu M Vs The Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
C.M.P.No.1570 of 2026 in W.A.SR.No.8490 of 2026R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDSHAMIM AHMED, J.(Order of the Court was made by R. SURESH KUMAR, J.) This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 40 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. Mr.M.Bindran, learned AdditionalGovernment Pleader accepts notice for the respondents 1 & 2 and he has no serious objection in allowing the petition. R3 though had been served and the name and the address of the third respondent has been printed in the cause list, no one is appearing on behalf of him.4. Since the delay is 40 days, having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. (R.S.K., J.) (S.S.A., J.) 26.02.2026 vji https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
P.ANANDHAN Vs State by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in ..Petitioner(s) Vs State by, The Inspector of Police, AWPS, Neyveli Police Station, Cr.No.19 of 2021. ..Appellant(s) Vs State Rep By The Inspector Of Police, AWPS,Neyveli Police Station, Cr.No.19/2021. To modify the bail condition that to executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) with two sureties, imposed in Crl.MP.No.18689 of 2023 in Crl.A.No.469 of 2023, dated 25.10.2025. To call for the records and set aside the conviction and sentence imposed against the appellant on 23.08.2022 in Spl SC no. 85/2021 on the file of the Page1 of 4 Special Court for Exclusive trial of cases under POCSO act, Cuddalore District and acquit the appellant For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Pugalenthi For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate(criminal Side)OrderThe petitioner seeks modification of the condition imposed by this Court while suspending the sentence on 25....
G.K.Rajkumar @ Rajkumar Gopalsamy Krishnaraj Vs The State Rep. by the ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR in Crl.OP No. 18623 of 2025 G.K.Rajkumar @ Rajkumar Gopalsamy Krishnaraj ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, ..Respondent(s) To relax the condition imposed in Para No. 7(C) by this Honble Court in Crl.OP No. 18623/2025 dt. 10.07.2025 and pass such other orders as this Honble Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Dinesh For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed upon the petitioner in Crl.OP No. 18623 of 2025 by order dated 10.07.2025, passed by this Court to report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. Page1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.GBI 2.When the matter was came up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent police reported that the case has been investigated and the final report is filed as a mistake of fact.3. C...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »