Chennai Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
G.Senthilkumar vs P.Dom
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI C.M.A. No. 2517 of 2023 G.Senthilkumar S/o.Ganesan, No.343/2, Ambedkar 2nd Street, Kunnathur Village, Manamai Post, Kalpakkam Via., Kanchipuram District. ..Appellant(s) Vs1. P.Dom, S/o.P.Innaya Naidu, Chinnapar Street, Molachur Village Milachur, Sriperumbudur, Chennai 56.2. Shriram General Insurance Co.Ltd., No.66, Thirumalai Pillai Road, T.Nagar, Chennai 17.3. C.Murugan.S/o.Chinnapaiyan. No.49B, Vathiyur, Ozhakolpattu Kanchipuram District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Award and Decree dated 25-07-2022 in M.C.O.P.No.1584 of 2015 on the file of the learned Special Sub Court No.1, Motor Accident Claims Petition, Small Causes Court, Chennai.Page1 of 8 For Appellant(s) : Ms.Ramya V.Rao For Respondent(s): Ms. C. Bhuvana Sundari for R2 R1 and R3 Notice Dispensed WithJudgmentThe pe...
Ganesamoorthy vs Assistant Engineer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
Today, the matter has been brought under the caption for being mentioned at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner.2. When the matter is taken up, the learned counsel for thepetitioner submitted that in paragraph No.7 of the order dated 26.02.2026, it has wrongly been mentioned as there is no impediment for the grant of electricity service connection to the petitioner instead of there is no impediment for disconnecting the service connection. Hence, the same requires correction.3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.4. In view of the above, the last sentence of paragraph No.7 of theorder shall be replaced as follows:7.. In such circumstances, there is no impediment for disconnecting the service connection to the petitioner. mrp5. Registry is directed to carryout necessary correction and issue a fresh order copy to the parties. All other portions of the order shall remain unaltered. 10.04.2026 mrp...
Kaliyamoorthy vs the State Rep.by the Deputy Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.02.2026Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN Kaliyamoorthy ... Petitioner Vs. State represented by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tindivanam Sub-Divison, Mailam Police Station ...Respondent Cr.No.217 of 2017 Prayer: This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking suspension of dated 30.09.2024 and release the petitioner on bail, pending criminal appeal. For Petitioner : M/s.V.Gayathri For Respondent : Mr.A.Damodaran, Addl. Public Prosecutor *******ORDER(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN, J.) This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking suspension of dated 30.09.2024 and enlarge the petitioner on bail, pending appeal. 2 It is seen that even though charges framed under the provisions of SC/ST (PoA) Act, the learned trial Judge not found the accused guilty for the offence under the provisions of SC/ST (PoA) Act and neither the State nor the Def...
Mrs.Annamariya Vs P.S.Kannan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
A.No.707 of 2024 in A.No.1826 of 2023 in E.P No.107 of 2022 26.02.2026ORDER1. This is an application filed by the applicant/3rd party to take note of the illegal dispossession of the applicant herein and order restoration of possession to the applicant.2. The case of the applicant is that she is a tenant in respect of a portion of theproperty at No.26/6, Somu Chetty Street, 5th Lane, Royapuram, Chennai for over a decade, under the 2nd respondent and thereafter under the 3rd respondent herein on a monthly rent of Rs.2,500/- and she was running a business dealing with old cardboard boxes and iron scrap business, which is her only source of livelihood. The applicant further stated that on 20.12.2023 certain persons claiming to be from this court visited the place of business and insisted her to vacate and she informed them that she is a tenant in the premises. Thereafter, she issued notice to the Inspector, Royapuram Police Station and to the Commissioner of Police on 21.12.2023 narrating...
E.Kumar Vs Devan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI C.M.A. No. 449 of 2026 E.Kumar, S/o. Ettiyan, No. 36, Patti Street, Pathirapuliyur, Villupuram-304. ..Appellant(s) Vs1. Devan, No.11, Konnur High Road, Ayanavaram, Chennai-23.2. The Manager,United India Insurance Company Limited, No. 134, Greams Road, Chennai-06. (1st Respondent was set ex parte by the Tribunal) ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the MotorVehicles Act, 1988, to enhance the compensation awarded in the final Orderdated 14.06.2024 in M.C.O.P.No.595 of 2020 on the file of the learned II Judge, Court of Small Causes, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chennai. For Appellant(s): Mr.S.Ravikumar For Respondent(s): Mr. J. Chandran for R2 R1 - Notice Dispensed With Page1 of 7JudgmentThis Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the claimant seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims T...
K. Srinivasan vs a.K. Ponnusamy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN K. Srinivasan S/o Kandasamy Pottai Road, Sankarapuram Chinnasalem District ..Appellant(s) Vs1. A.K. Ponnusamy S/o Kandasamy Pillai Vallikandan Nilayam Katchery Road, Kallakurichi Villupuram District2. The District Registrar,Kallakurichi District, Kallakurichi Impleaded The 2nd Respondent, Vide Order Of Court Dated 19/06/2023 Made in Cmp.No, ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment dated 01.04.2009 in O.S.No.12/2005 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Villupuram. For Appellant(s): Ms.G.V.Seethalakshmi For Appellant For Respondent(s): M/s.K.Rajasekaran FOR R1 Mr.M.Murali, Government Advocate For R2Page1 of 14JUDGMENTUnsuccessful defendant has preferred this appeal suit. The Suit is filed for Specific Performance and the suit is decreed as prayed for. Aggrieved over the same, the defendant has preferred this ap...
C.U.Vijayavarma Vs Sri Priya Komagan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN and Vs Vs Page1 of 4To Transpose the present Crl.R.C.No.2116 of 2025 pending on the file of the Honble Court as Criminal Appeal to set aside the order of acquittal dated 14.07.2025 made in STC.No.89 of 2021, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate- II, Chidambaram. To allow the revision case and setaside the order dt. 14.07.2025 passed in Crl.Appeal No. 40/2023 on the file of the II nd Additional District and Sessions Court, Chidambaram reversing the order dt. 06.04.2023 in STC No. 89/2021 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Chidambaram. For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.BaskarFor Respondent(s): Mr.R.Bharath KumarORDERThe present petition is filed to transpose the present Revision into an Appeal. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Revision has been filed against the Judgment of the appellate Court acquitting the respondent of the offence under Secti...
J.Magesh Selvaraj Vs Sophia
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE AND J.Magesh Selvaraj S/o. Mr.John Pandian, Res. at No.20/33, Old State Bank Colony Road, West Tambaram, Chennai-600 045. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Sophia W/o. Mr.Chelladurai, Res. at No.17, Good Will Nagar, 1st Main Road, Aishwaryam Apartment, Old Perungalathur, Chennai-600 063.2. Jancy W/o.Stalin, No.26, Periyar Nagar, Pulikoradu, West Tambaram, Chennai 45. ..Respondent(s)To transfer the Suit in OS.No. 813/2025 from the file of Additional District Court at Chengalpattu to the file of Additional District court at Nagercoil and for other consequential orders and pass as such other orders and thus render justice. Page1 of 5 To stay all further proceedings in the suit in OS.No. 813/2025, on the file of the Additional District Court at Chengalpattu pending disposal of the above Tr.cmp. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Muruganantham For Respondent(s): Mr.K.ChandrasekaranOrderHeard.2. This Transfer ...
V.Dhanuskodi Ambalam, vs 1. T.N. Land Reforms
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
2026:MHC:822IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN V.Dhanuskodi Ambalam, S/o. Vellayan Ambalam, Main Bazaar Street, Pallavarayanpattim Post, Pannaipuram Via, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Madurai District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Tamil Nadu Land Reforms Special Appellate Tribunal, Chennai2. The Commissioner and Director of Land Reforms, Chennai 600 005.3. The Assistant Commissioner, (Land Reforms), Madurai. ..Respondent(s)PETITION filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the proceedings dated 27.04.2000 made in Special Revision Petition No.23 of 1999 passed by the first respondent and quash the same. Page1 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Elansezhiyan For Mr.G.Ethirajulu For Respondent(s): R1 Tribunal Mr.R.Ramanlaal, AAG assisted by Mr.T.Arun Kumar, AGP For R2 & R3.ORDER(Order of the Cour...
PREMNATH Vs Mariya Pradeep
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Premnath S/O. Ekanathan, Residing At Flat No110, Lemongraz Apartment, Kallikuppam Ambattur Chennai 600 053 President of Lemongraz Apartment Owner Association ..Petitioner Vs1. Mariya Pradeep2. Muthukumaran3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police4. The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by the Inspector of Police, Chennai - 600 053. ..Respondent(s)PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to allow this Criminal Original Petition and issue an appropriate direction to the Station House Officer, T1 Police Station, Ambattur to comply with the order dated 30th January 2024 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur in Crl.M.P. No. 3483 of 2023 by registering an FIR and conducting an investigation into the petitioner's complaint. For Petitioner : Mr.C.SugumarFor Respondents : Mr.J.Kamaraj for R1 & R2 Mr.S.Santh...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »