Chennai Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Member Secretary Vs V.Kalyani
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
C.M.P.No.5599 of 2026 in CRP.SR.No.213970 of 2025P.B.BALAJI, J.Dispensed with for the present.2. Registry is directed to number the Civil Revision Petition, if it is otherwise in order. 27.02.2026 dna https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
N.Arul Mohan Vs R.Siva Raja
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in N.Arul Mohan S/o.Nagarajan, 123, 9th Cross Street, Prakash Nagar, Thirninnavur Thiruvalllur-602 024 Petitioner(s) Vs Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Miscellaneous Petition under Section 528 of BNSS to consider and relax the condition imposed in Para No.5 (v) vide order dated 10.07.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.13486 of 2025 in Crl.R.C.772 of 2025 and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Ms..S.SharmilaORDERThis petition is filed to relax the condition imposed in Paragraph No.5(v) of the order dated 10.07.2025 in Crl.M.P. No. 13486 of 2025 in Crl.R.C. No. 772 of 2025 by which the petitioner was directed to appear before the Trial Court on the first working day of every English Calendar month at 10.30a.m. until the disposal of the revision petition, while granting suspension of sentence.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. Considering the fact that the petitioner has been appearing...
Karthick Vs Sub-Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.4913 of 2026 Karthick S/o Subramani ... Petitioner Vs The State rep. by, The Sub Inspector of Police, Chengam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District Crime No.430 of 2025 ...Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant bail to the petitioner/accused in Crime No.430 of 2025 on the file of the The Sub Inspector of Police, Chengam Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District and pass orders. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.S. Silambuselvan For Respondent(s) : Mr. A. Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 28.12.2025, for the offence under Section 103(1), 238 of BNS 2023 in Crime No.430 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that on the date of occurrence there was a wordy quarre...
CHANDRU Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
Crl.M.P.No.3622 of 2026 in Crl.A.SR.No.6007 of 2026SUNDER MOHAN, J.This petition is filed to condone the delay of 162 days in filing the Criminal Appeal against the judgement in Spl.S.C.No.34 of 2023 dated 21.06.2025 on the file of the Special Court for POCSO Cases, Thiruvallur.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Vinothraja, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay stands condoned and the petition is ordered. 27.02.2026 Anu Note: Registry is directed to number this Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order. 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Tvl.JAISWAL MOTORS, Vs The State Tax Officer (FAC),
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.8863 and 8865 of 2026 Tvl.JAISWAL MOTORS, A Proprietorship Concern, Represented By Its Accountant, Ms Kalaivani Suresh. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The State Tax Officer (FAC),Thiruvallikeni Assessment Circle, No.333, 3rd Floor, The Integrated Building for Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, (South Tower),Nandanam, Chennai-600 035.2. The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, The Commercial Taxes Department, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Thiruvallikeni, South-I, Chennai South, Pincode-600 005. ..Respondent(s)Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the Impugned Order vide Form GST DRC-07 dated 24.02.2025 passed by the 1 st Respondent in Ref.No. ZD330225250415R under Section 73 of the TNGST Act for the tax period April 2020 to March 2021, in respect of the petiti...
VINAYAGAM Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Vinayagam S/o.Srinivasan, Residing at No.29, Ayothi Kovil Street, Padi, Tiruvallur District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, T-2, Ambattur Estate Police Station, Tiruvallur District. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER:Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of the arrest in Cr.No.53/2026 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): A.Samson For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate(Crl. Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 05.02.2026, for the alleged offence punishable under Section 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 309(4), 311, 351(3) of BNS Act in Crime No.53 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. Page1 of 52. The allegation against the petitioner is that he, along with ...
R.Rajendran vs Thirumagal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 27.02.2026Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL and M.P.No.1 of 2015 --- R.Rajendran .. Appellant Vs.1. Thirumagal2. Ulaganayagi3. Muthu @ Aravamudhan4. The Commissioner, Cuddalore Municipality, Cuddalore. .. Respondent Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 10.02.2015 passed in A.S.No.11 of 2014 on thefile of the III Additional Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore, confirming the judgmentand decree dated 10.09.2013 passed in O.S.No.263 of 2000 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Cuddalore. For appellant : Mr.R.Gururaj For respondents: Notice served - No appearance Page No.1/27JUDGMENTThis Second Appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 10.02.2015 passed in A.S.No.11 of 2014 on the file of the III Additional Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore, confirming the judgment and decree dated 10.09.2013 passed in O.S.No.263 of 2000 on the file of the Ad...
M.KANAGASAPAI Vs The District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE M.Kanagasapai ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, District Collectorate, 2.The Superintendent of Police, Office of Superintendent of Police, Manjakuppam, 3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bharathi Road, 4.The Inspector of Police, Muthandikuppam Police Station, 5.The Tahsildar, Panruti Taluk, Tahsildar office, Panruti, Cuddalore District. 6.The Land Surveyor, Panruti, Page No.1 of 6 7.Elaiyammal 8.Annalakshmi ... RespondentsPrayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd and 4th Respondents to give police protection to measure petitioner property in New Survey No.416/21 situated at Kattugudalur Village, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District based on the petitioners application dated 10.02.2026. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Balaramesh For Responden...
Tmt.P.Vanajakshi Vs The Metropolitan Transport
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
2026:MHC:836IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON: 05-02-2026PRONOUNCED ON: 27 - 02- 2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN WP No. 36589 of 2015 and MP.No.1 of 20151. Tmt.P.Vanajakshi Vanagaram, Chennai 95 Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Metropolitan TransportCorporation, Rep by its Managing Director, Pallavan Salai, Chennai 2 2.Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporations Employees Pension Fund Trust, Rep by its Administrator, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai 2. Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the order dated 22.4.2014 in Letter No.Ka.No.44P2/ TNSTC U O NI PO/2014- 88 passed by the 2nd respondent, quash the same and consequently direct the 2 ndrespondent to sanction and pay the petitioner dearness allowance corresponding to his basic pension which was paid to the petitioner and which is payable to him under the TNSTEC ...
Prem Ananth Raja (M/ 43 Years) vs State Rep by, the Inspector of Polic ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.4924 of 2026 1.Prem Ananth Raja 2.Raji3. Ravi @ Ravichandran4. Dinakaran5. Balaji ... Petitioners Vs. State rep by The Inspector of Police, T-1, Ambattur Police Station, Chennai. ... RespondentPRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest pending investigation in Cr.No.64 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners : Mr.T.Muruganantham For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.side)ORDERThe petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 74 and 351(1) of BNS Act (341, 294(b), 323, 354 and 503 of IPC) and Section 4 of TNPWH Act in Cr.No.64 of 2026 , on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that the first petitioner is running a...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »