Chennai Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jaganathan.M vs the Tahsildar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Jaganathan.M Petitioner(s) Vs1. The TahsildarTahsildar Office Tiruvallur District. 2.The Surveyor The Surveyor Office Tahsildar Office Tiruvallur Taluk, Tiruvallur District. 3.The Inspector Of Police B4. Police Station Sevvapet Tiruvallur District. Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to conduct a Survey of the petitioners land and demarcate the boundaries by laying the boundary stones in the petitioners land in Survey No.430/21, ad measuring about 21 1/2 cents located at Aranvoyal Village, Tiruvallur District. For Petitioner(s): M/s.S.Sushmitha For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam Govt Advocate For R1 and R2 Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal Govt Advocate(Crl.Side) For R3ORDERThis writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, based on his representation dated...
Karunnambal, vs the Regional Transport Authority,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN Karunnambal ..Petitioner(s) Vs. ..Respondent(s)Prayer : This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or order or direction in the nature of a Writ directing the respondent herein to pass early orders on the application of the petitioner dated 27.10.2025 for the grant of migration of Minibus permit on the route Kadaikkampatti to Chettiyarmattam, covered by vehicle bearing Registration No.Tn 32 N 0125, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Honble Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Padmanabhan For Respondent(s): Mrs.C.Meera Arumugham, AGPORDERThe petitioner possesses a Mini bus permit. The Government of Tamil Nadu issued two notifications on 24.01.2025 and 28.04.2025 permiting migration of the Mini bus permit under certain circumstances. The petitioner filed an application seeking grant of...
C.Karupusamy vs Veerappagounder
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
S.A.No. 751 of 2022 and C.M.P.No. 20854 of 2023T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.Today, this matter is taken up for hearing under the caption For being mentioned at the instance of learned counsel for appellant.2. Nothing survives for making any modification in the judgment of this court dated 27.02.2026. 07.04.2026 rpp https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M/s.M.R.Metals Vs Assistant Commissioner(ST)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and M/s.M.R.Metals Rep by its Proprietor Sheik Sulaiman Sheik Dhawood ..Petitioner(s) Vs Assistant Commissioner(ST), ..Respondent(s)Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings passed by the Respondent in the order vide GSTIN: 33BACPS5946Q1ZZ / 2021-2022, dated 15.12.2025 along with the consequential order under section 73 of TNGST/CGST Act, 2017 issued vide FORM DRC-07 Ref. No. ZD331225221285S dated 15.12.2025 for the financial year 2021-2022 to quash the same.For Petitioner(s): M/s.R. Hemalatha For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran Government Advocate Page1 of 4ORDERMr.V.Prashanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent.2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned...
P.Shanmugapriya vs the Principal Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI P.Shanmugapriya ..Petitioner Vs1. The Principal Secretary to Government Cooperation, Food and Consumer Protection Department Government of TamilNadu Secretariat, Fort St. George Chennai 600009.2. The Registrar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C. Nagar Park Town, Chennai 600003. ..RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to issue appropriate Government Orders extending the service of the petitioner and consequently directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue in service as Member, District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Madurai beyond 28.03.2026 with continuity of service, salary and all other attendant and concomitant service and pay benefits, until the completion of the recruitment Page1 of 7process under the new rules, in strict ...
G.Selvamoorthy vs the Chief Engineer/
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WP No.8100 of 2026 G.Selvamoorthy ..Petitioner Vs1. The Chief Engineer/Personnel The Tamil Nadu General and Distribution Corporation Ltd. (TANGEDCO) 144, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002.2. The Superintending EngineerThiruvannamalai Electricity, Distribution Circle TANGEDCO, Thiruvannamalai District-635 601. ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1 st and 2nd respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 24.06.2025 and to settle the arrears of amount as mentioned in Table A + Table B (Rs.19,63,746/-) be settled along with refixed salary, refixed pension arrears and arrears of retirement benefits and promotion arrears.For Petitioner: Mr.D.Rajagopal For Respondents: Mr.C.Manoharan Standing Counsel Page1 of 7ORDERThis petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 1 st and 2nd respond...
Tvl.Jagadathri Papers Pvt Ltd Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHYTvl.Jagadathri Papers Pvt Ltd Rep. by its Director, No.15, Survey Nos.652 and 654, Keeraladi, Jameen Endathur, Maduranthakam-603 306. ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the impugned order of Assessment in TIN 33051681559/ 2014-15 dated 10.02.2020 issued by the respondent and to quash the same as being arbitrary and illegal. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Ganesh Kanna For Respondent(s): Ms.P.Selvi, Government AdvocateORDERLearned counsel for the petitioner has submitted letter dated 23.02.2026 stating that the matter was resolved under the amnesty scheme. Page1 of 32. In view thereof, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn without anyorder as to costs. Consequently, the connected writ miscellaneous petition isclosed. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-spea...
O. Shanmugam Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by, The Inspector of Polic ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in Crl.A.No.244 of 2026 O.Shanmugam ... Petitioner/Accused Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Omalur, Salem District (Crime No.15 of 2023) ... RespondentPRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 430 of BNSS., pleased to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner in Special Sessions Case No.220 of 2023 on the file of the Court of the learned Sessions Judge, Principal POCSO Court and enlarge the petitioner on bail, pending disposal of the Criminal Appeal. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Selvaraj For Respondent : Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner/accused, seeking suspension of sentence, imposed by the learned Sessions Judge, Principal POCSO Court, Salem, vide judgment in Special S.C.No.220 of 2023 dated 07.02.2026.2. The petitioner/accused ...
J.Muthukumaran vs the Secretary to the Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WP No.8512 of 2026 J.Muthukumaran ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Secretary to the Government, School Education Department,2. The Secretary to Government, Finance (pension) Department,3. The Commissioner,4. The Educational Officer,5. The Head Mistress, Chennai Higher Secondary School, No.3, Bharathidasan Street, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai 600 041. Page1 of 66. The Accountant General,DMS Campus, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to transfer the petitioner name from Contributory Pension Scheme to Old Pension Scheme prevailed prior to implementation of contributory pension scheme based on the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.01.2026.For Petitioner(s) : Mr.V.Kasinatha Bharathi For Respondent(s) : Mrs.Mythreye Chandru for R1 to ...
K.Kuppusamy, Vs The Tahsildar,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE K.Kuppusamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, 2.The Taluk Head Surveyor, 3.The Inspector of Police, Indur Police Station, Dharmapuri District. ... RespondentsPrayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to survey and measure the land in S.No.613/10A to an extent of 0-27.12 hectares situated at Dhalavaihalli Village, Nallampalli Taluk, Dharmapuri District along with the assistance of the 3 rd Respondent within the time frame fixed by this Court.Page No.1 of 6 For Petitioner : Mr.J.Pradeep For Respondents : Mr.S.Arumugam Government Advocate [R1 & R2] Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal Government Advocate (Crl.Side) [R3] *****ORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner i...
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »