Chennai Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.Baskar vs the Principal Secretary
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI S.Baskar ..Petitioner Vs 1.The Principal Secretary Department of Civil Supplies, Food & Consumer Protection, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai-09. 2.The Registrar State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Frazer Bridge Road, VOC Nagar (Behind TNPSC), Park Town, Chennai-03. ..Respondent(s)Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to extend the tenure of the Petitioner as Member of District consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Dharmapuri @ Krishnagiri, with the existing service conditions, until the completion of selection process as per new rules in terms of the judgement of the Honble Supreme Court of India in Ganeshkumar Rajeshwarrao Selukar and others Vs. Mahendra Bhaskar Limaye and others in Civil Appeal No.9982 of 2024 dated 21.05.2025 reported in (2025) 8 SCC 634....
R.SUMATHI Vs The Director of School Education (Service Division)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and WMP.Nos.8181 & 8184 of 2026 R.Sumathi C/o.Anbazhagan, Door No.1, Agrahara Street, Sivan Temple, Vikkiravandi Post, Villupuram District-605 652 ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Director of School Education (Service Division)2. Financial Advisor and The Principal Accounts Officer3. The Regional Accoutns Officer (Audit) School Education Department,4. The Chief educational Officer o/o.The chief Educational Office, Moovendar Nagar, Near the New Bus Stand, Villupuram-605 602.5. The Headmaster Government Higher Secondary School, Page1 of 6 Ponnankuppam, Villupuram District-605 652. ..Respondent(s)Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the proceedings of the second respondent having Ref. No. Na.Ka. No.053130/ Aa. Ka. Tha/ 2023 dated 09.01.2024 raising audit objection to the grant of ...
K.Vatchaladevi Vs The district collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE1. K.Vatchaladevi Petitioner(s) Vs1. The District CollectorCuddalore District, District Collectorate office, Cuddalore Dsitrict. 2.The Special Tahsildar Adi Dravidar Welfare Department, Cuddalore District. 3.The Village Administrative officer Pillai Village Village, Cuddalore Taluk and Dsitrict. Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the 1st respondent to consider petitioner representation dated on 4.8.2025 and conduct a survey of Plot No.104, Pillai Thottai A-Colony, Thiruvandipuram in Re-Survey No.87/3 and 87/5B and issue the E-pattaFor Petitioner(s): M/s.M.S.Akash Daniel For Respondent: Mr. D.Ravichander, Special Government PleaderORDERThis writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the first respondent to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition and for issuance of separate patta in the name of the petitioner,...
T.MANIKANDAN Vs The Sub Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and WMP Nos.8661 & 8662 of 2026 T.Manikandan ..Petitioner Vs The Sub Collector District Revenue Officer Thesianvalivu Taluk Tirunelveli District. ..Respondent(s)Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari Mandamus, calling for the records on the file of the respondent in proceedings made in Na.Ka.No.A2/5174/2020 dated 11.09.2020 , and quash the same and direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with all consequential service and monetary benefits within a short date as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner: Mr.Ramesh Babu For Respondent: Mr.P.Balathandayutham Page1 of 8Special Government PleaderORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 11.09.2020 issued by the respondent and quash the same and direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with all consequenti...
Sivanadham Vs The State Rep by Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Sivanandham ... Petitioner/A2 Vs. The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, Crime No.306 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.306 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Vijayakumar For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThe petitioner herein apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 132, 121(1) and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No.306 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was involved in attacking the Forest Guard while he was discharging his official duty, due to which he sustained grievous inju...
G.Ranjithkumar vs State Rep.by. the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR in Crl.O.P.NO.30622 of 2024 G.Ranjithkumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep.By. The Inspector Of Police Crime no.12 of 2024 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This petition is filed to relax the condition imposed by this honourable For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Shanmugam For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana, GA (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition is filed to relax the condition imposed by this honourable2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner is regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court.3. Considering the said submission, the condition imposed by this Courtin Crl.MP.No.357 of 2025 vide order dated 10.01.2025, is relaxed and the Page1 of 3 petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.4. With the above direction, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands ordered. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutra...
Thangavel(Died) vs Ranganatha Gounder
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE and M.P.No.1 of 20131. THANGAVEL(died)2. Kanakambaram3. Thanikachalam4. Kumari5. Shankar6. Prabakaran[R2 to R 6 who are the legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant viz Thangavel were transposed as appellants 2 to 6 vide order of court dated 23/04/2019 made in CMP No.9034 of 2019 in SA.No.210 of 2013] ..Appellants Vs1. Ranganatha Gounder7. Boopathi..Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal filed under section 100 of CPC that the judgment and decree of the Court of the 2nd Additional Subordinate Judge, Villupuram in Page1 of 8 AS.No.2 of 2008 dated 21.12.2012 in confirming the judgment and decree on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Tirukoilur in OS No 364 of 2005 dated 12.04.2007 is even otherwise illegal, incompetent, irregular and without jurisdiction. For Appellant(s): Mrs.V.Srimathi (R2 to R6 transposed as appellants) For R1 Ms.R.Meenal No appearance For R7JudgmentHeard.2....
B.S.Saralamman Vs The Special Deputy Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
C.M.P.No.5652 of 2026 in A.S.SR.No.7025 of 2026P.B.BALAJI, J.Dispensed with for the present.2. Registry is directed to number the Appeal, if it is otherwise in order. 27.02.2026 dna https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Armstrong Spinning Mills (P) LTD, Vs Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA and WMP No. 8527 of 2026 Armstrong Spinning Mills (P) LTD, 61 C,Saminathapuram II street, Anuparapalayam Post, Tirupur-641652., rep by its Authorized Signatory A.Arumugam ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Building,Thiru.Vi.Ka.Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai-600 032.2. The Chairman,3. Director Finance (TNPDCL),4. The Superintending Engineer (TNPDCL)5. The Superintending Engineer(TNPDCL), Gobi Electricity Distribution Circle,Gobi ..Respondent(s)PRAYER: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents and their men, agents from collecting current consumption charges, demand charges and Page1 of 4any arrears from the petitioner H.T.Sc.No.049094360083 until the respondents makes payment of the outstanding dues of Rs.5,14,711 /- (for the year of 2024- 2025 payable to the petitioner o...
H.Jaferin vs the State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
W.M.P No.8801 of 2026 in W.P No.8127 of 2026M.DHANDAPANI, J.This petition filed to dispense with the production of the original impugned orders, is ordered. 27.02.2026 uma (2/3) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »