Chennai Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tvl Sha Marketing vs the Deputy State Tax Officer I
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and Tvl Sha Marketing Rep. by its Prop. Mr. Peer Mohamed Jaffar Ali, No.9/22, Kandappa Street, Choolai, Chennai 600 112 ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the file of the Respondent in the impugned proceedings bearing reference GSTIN:33ADPPJ0975K3Z5/2019-20 dated 17.08.2024 passed by the Respondent, under the provisions of GST Act, 2017 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to pass DE NOVO order. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Subramaniyam R For Respondent(s): Ms.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran Government Advocate.ORDERMs.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent. Page1 of 42. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel fo...
S. Jayaraman (EF 0124), Vs Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Sal ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI1. S. Jayaraman (EF 0124), S/o. Sellamuthu, No. 40/2, 3rd Ayyagounder Street, Vazhapadi Post, Salem- 636 115.2. M. Kuppusamy (EF 0126), S/o. Muthukrishnan, Door No. 130, Mettu Street, Thenpasiyar Post, Villupuram- 604 3023. C. Murugan (CR 3275), S/o. Chidambaram, No. 4/195, Asokan Street, Jothi Nagar, Aatur Taluk, Salem- 636 1024. P. Sairam (DR3507) S/o. Periyasamy, Door No. 143/ 456A/1, Gandhipuram, Aatur Taluk, Salem- 636 1085. A. Vetriselvan (DR 5597), S/o. Arumugam No. 13, Kottakarai Street Pethanaickenpalayam Post Salem- 636 109 Page1 of 66. K. Raju (DR 2913), S/o. Kanjamalaipathar, Door No. 9/14/27, South Street, Thenkarai, Gangavalli, Salem- 636 116.7. S. Abubakkar (DR 5573), S/o. Syed Kareem, No. 12/489-2, Mettupatty, Govindasamy Nagar, Dharmapuri- 636 9038. S. Ramanathan (DR 4800), S/o. Sengodan, Pillaiyarkovil Street, Ulipuram Post, Salem- 636 1189. M. Palanisamy (CR 3316) S...
M/s.Tarajyot Polymers Limited Vs The Chief Commissioner of Customs (Re ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE M/s.Tarajyot Polymers Limited Represented by its Director, Mr.Suresh Kumar Ramsisaria, Lalbagh Road, Bangalore-560 027 ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Chief Commissioner of Customs (Refunds Ch- II) Customs House Customs House, No 60 Rajaji Salai, ..Respondent(s)Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to decide the refund claims filed by them against Bill of Entry No.767026, Bill of Entry No.767028, Bill of Entry No.770584, Bill of Entry No.770585, Bill of Entry No.792579, Bill of Entry No.803779, Bill of Entry No.810886, Bill of Entry No.811911, Bill of Entry No.811994, Bill of Entry No.813776, Bill of Entry No.813476 within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.For Petitioner(s): M/s.KTK.Priyadarsini for Mr.S.Murugappan For Respondent(s): M/s.Anu Ganesan,JSC Page1 of 4ORDERThis writ pe...
A.B.S.Engineers vs Kalyani
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI CMP No.5533 of 2026 in CRP.No.4897 of 2025 M/s.A.B.S.Engineers Having office at, No. 32, New Street, Cholapuram, S.M.Nagar, Chennai-600062. Appellant(s) Vs.1. KalyaniW/o. Late Vinayagam, Res. at District. 2.Kalaivani D/o. Late Vinayagam, Res. at District. Kalaiselvam (Died) 3.Kalaimathi D/o.Late Vinayagam, Res. at District. 4.The Branch Manager Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Office at Katpadi Road, Gudiyatham, Vellore District. Respondent(s)PRAYER: This Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 151 of CPC, to modify the conditional order dated 17.12.2025 made in CRP.No.4897/2025 to deposit a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- to the credit of the MCOP.No.28/2011, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gudiyatham/Subordinate Court, Gudiyatham, Vellore District and permit the petitioner to deposit Rs.1,00,000/- on or before 31.03.2026, and the balance Rs.2,00,000/- in four month...
ALEX PANDIAN Vs The State represented by its
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR in Crl.O.P.No.19027 of 2025 Alex Pandian ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The State represented by its The Inspector of police, All Women Police Station, Virugambakkam, Chennai. Crime No.10 of 20252. R.Mary Asha..Respondent(s) To modify the condition no.9(d) in Crl.O.P.No.19027 of 2025 dated 28.08.2025 by permitting the petitioner to travel abroad. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Shanmugasundaram, Senior Advocate for M/s.Om Sai Ram For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana, For R1 Government Advocate (Crl.Side) Mr.A.Ashwin Kumar, for R2ORDERThis petition has been filed to modify the condition No.9 (d) in Crl.O.P.No.19027 of 2025 dated 28.08.2025 by permitting the petitioner to travel abroad. Page1 of 52.The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was originally working at Canada and during his visit to India, he had developed physical relationship with the defacto compla...
R.Dharmaram vs the Revenue Divisional Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE1. R.Dharmaram Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Revenue Divisional OfficerGobichettipalayam, Erode District. 2.The Thasildar Office of the Thasildar Land Survey Division, Sathyamangalam Taluk, 3.The Surveyor Land Survey Department, Office of the Thasildar Sathyamangalam Taluk, 4.The Inspector of Police Sathyamangalam Police Station, Sathyamangalam Taluk, Erode District. Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the 3rd Respondent to survey and measure the Petitioners land as per his Deeds of Sale Dated 12.11.2010 and 19.12.2024 registered as Document No.6512 of 2010 and 8413 of 2024 at the Office of SRO, Sathyamangalam.For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Karthikeyan For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam Govt Advocate For R1 to R3 Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal Govt Advocate(Crl.Side) For R4ORDERThis writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the third respondent to survey and demarcate the property, which according t...
B.Ganesh Sundar vs Anand and Co
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN IN CRL RC NO. 488 of 2026 1.B.Ganesh Sundar S/o.Ganesan, Proprietor, M/s.B.G.S. Enterprises, No.27, Chellapillaiyar Koil Street, Royapettah, Chennai-600 014 2.B.G.S.Enterprisees, Rep. By its Proprietor B.Ganesh Sundar, No.30, Chinnappa Rawther Street, Triplicane, Chennai-600 005 ..Petitioner(s) Vs M/s.Anand & Co., Rep. By its Managing Director, Mr.Manish Chowdhari, No.191, Mount Road, Chennai-600 006 ..Respondent(s) To suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioners in thejudgement dated 30.12.2024 in STC.No.10621 of 2023 as confirmed inCrl.A.No.446 of 2025 dated 10.02.2026, and enlarge the first petitioner on bail pending disposal of the Criminal Revision. For Petitioner(s): M/s.V.Saral Page1 of 6ORDERThe petitioners have preferred the above revision challenging thejudgment passed by the learned XVIII Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, inCrl.A.No.446 of 2025 dated 10.02.2026,...
B. Rajkumar Jain Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR IN CRL OP NO. 1372 OF 2026 B. Rajkumar Jain ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Tambaram City Police, Sholinganallur, ..Respondent(s) To modify the condition imposed in paragraph 6 of the order dated 02.02.2026 made in Crl.OP.No.1372 of 2026, by directing the petitioner to appear before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kancheepuram, instead of the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Sholinganallur, for the purpose of executing the bond and complying with the bail conditions. For Petitioner(s): M/s.A.Neeraj For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to modify the condition in para No.6 imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.1372 of 2026, dated 02.02.2026, directing that the petitioner shall appear before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kancheepuram, instead of the learned District ...
S.Shankar vs the Managing Director
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA S.Shankar S/o.Shanmugam Sikkalur Village post Dharmapuri District -636 906 ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Managing Director PT Lee chengalvarayan Naicker Trust building2. The Special Tahsildar3. Mathialagan S/o.Muthu Naripalli village, Harur Taluk4. M.Latha W/o.Kasinathan No.11,Mottur Dharmapuri District -636906 ..Respondent(s)PRAYER: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to provide signals and furnish set top boxes enable petitioner to provide services for the consumers in the Bairnaickenpatti village, Harur Taluk, Dharmapuri District Page1 of 4 within a stipulated period of time by considering the representation dated 25.10.2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Ezhilarasan Bharathi.M.P. A.Joshja S.Manoj For Respondent(s): Mrs.R.L.Karthika, Government Advocate for R2ORDERThe petition has been filed to dir...
Poongavanam vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSEPoongavanam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, District Collector Office, 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Sriperumputhur, 3.The Tahsildar, Kundrathur Taluk Office, 4.Mohan ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to consider and dispose the petitioners representation dated 04.09.2025 in accordance with law and thereby direct him to cancel the sub-division made in Survey No.24/2B into Survey No.24/2B1 and Survey No.24/2B2, in respect of the property situated at Somangalam Village, Page No.1 of 6Kundrathur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and also to Cancel the Patta No.7807 which was issued in the name of the 4 th respondents father i.e. Kannan and consequently direct him to issue the Patta No.701, to an extent of 17 cents of...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »