Chennai Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M. Balamurugan Vs The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR1. M. Balamurugan2. Rani3. Munusamy ..Petitioner(s) Vs. The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Cr.No.16 of 2026. ..Respondent(s)To amend the offence under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) and 351(3) of BNS r/w Section 4 of Women Harasment Act instead of offence under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) & 351(3) of IPC r/w Section 4 of Women Harassment Act in the above Crl.O.P.No.2439 of 2026 dated 30.01.2026. For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Murthy For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed seeking to amend the order in Crl.O.P.No.2439 of 2026 dated 30.01.2026 by including the offence under Sections as 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) and 351(3) of BNS r/w Section 4 of Women Harasment Act instead of offence under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) & 351(3) of IPC r/w Section 4 of Women Harassment Act.Page1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.GBI2. In view of the ...
Lavanya Vs State rep. by The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Lavanya ..Petitioner(s) Vs State rep. by The Inspector of Police (Crime No. 41 of 2025) ..Respondent(s) To extend the time to execute sureties order passed in Crl.OP.No.31645 of 2025 dated 20.11.2025 connection with Crime No.41 of 2025 on the file of the Inspector of Police, W-5, AWPS Selaiyur Police Station, Chengalpattu. For Petitioner(s): N.Vinayakamoorthy For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to extend the time for executing the sureties as per the order of this Court in Crl.OP.No.31645 of 2025 dated 20.11.2025. Page1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.GBI2. Heard both sides.3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition isordered and time is extended by one week to the petitioner to comply the conditions as ordered by this Court, from the date on which, the order copy made ready. GBI To1. The Inspector of Police 2...
Ravichandran Vs The State Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR in Ravichandran ..... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Coimbatore . ... Respondent (Crime No.702 of 2025) For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : M/s.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side) **********ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.553 of 2026 on 19.01.2026. Page No.1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.Sma2. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that, the petitioner is complying with the condition regularly imposed by this Court.3. Considering the said submission and reasons stated in the affidavit,the condition imposed on the petitioner is relaxed. However, it is made clear that, the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. 27.02.2026 Index : Yes/NoSpeaking Order/Non Speaking OrderSma To1. The Inspector ...
Ramasamy (16167) Vs Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Coimbatore ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WP Nos. 7123, 7125, 7128, 7132 & 7135 of 2026 Ramasamy Petitioner in WP.No.7123 of 2026 Ravikumar Petitioner in WP.No.7125 of 2026 Murugan Petitioner in WP.No.7128 of 2026 Swaminathan Petitioner in WP.No.7132 of 2026 Venkatachalapathy Babu Petitioner in WP.No.7135 of 2026 Vs Rep. by its The Managing Director, Respondent in all the writ petitionsCOMMON PRAYER; The writ petitions have been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay him the arrears of difference in gratuity to pay him arrears of difference in Earned Leave Salary and to pay him arrears of difference in wages from 01.09.2023 to the date of his retirement as admitted by the respondent in their RTI reply together with interest at the rate of 12 percent per annum, within a specified time as may be fixed by this Honourable Court, Award Costs. For Petitioner...
S.Vetriselvan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WMP No. 7747 & 7749 of 2026 S.Vetriselvan S/o Subbayya Junior Environmental Scientist (Special Grade) O/o Advanced Environmental Laboratory, Tamil nadu Pollution Control Board, No 5 Ramasamy Nagar, Goundampalayam, Coimbatore 641 030 Petitioner(s) Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Muthappan For Respondent: Mr.C.Selvaraj, AGP Ms.Madhuri Dondi Reddy RR2 & 3ORDERIf stay is granted in this case, it will amount virtually allowing the prayer made in the writ petition. Therefore, stay petition is not entertained and the same is dismissed. rli M.DHANDAPANI J. rli To 1.The State of Tamil Nadu 2.Tamil Nadu Pollution control Board Rep by its Chairman, 75 Mount road, guindy, Chennai 600 032 3.Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board Rep by its Member secretary, 75 Mount road, guindy, Chennai 600 032...
A.Sakthivel vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI A.Sakthivel Petitioner(s) Vs1. The District Collector Salem, salem District. Unathur Village Panchayat, Unathur, Thalaivasal Panchayat Union, Attur Taluk,salem District. Respondent(s)PRAYER;This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd Respondents to provide subsistence allowances to the petitioner from November 2019 onwards to till date and by considering representation dated 19.01.2026 made by the petitioner and within a stipulated period. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Ganesan For Respondent: Mr.S.Balamurugan GAORDERThis petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 2nd Respondents to provide subsistence allowances to the petitioner from November 2019 onwards to till date and by considering representation dated 19.01.2026 made by the petitioner and within a stipulated period.2. It is the case of the petitioner th...
Sri Vinayaga Handlers Pvt Ltd vs Proper Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN IN WP NO. 42182 OF 2025 Sri Vinayaga Handlers Pvt Ltd Rep By Its Director 61, Arathoon Road, Royapuram, Chennai- 13. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Proper Officer Royapuram Assessment Circle, Chennai.2. The Assistant CommissionerRoyapuram North Ii, Chennai-3 ..Respondent(s) Writ Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to modify the order dated 18.11.2025 passed in WP.No. 42182 of 2025 by directing the petitioner to deposit 25% only of the two surviving demands, excluding amount already paid and demand already dropped and to pass For Petitioner(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, Government Advocate Page1 of 6ORDERHeard Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, the learned Government Advocate, on behalf of the respondents.2. This petition has been filed for modification of the order dated 18.11.2025 made in W.P.No.42812 of 2025 wherein it is ordered as unde...
Aarthi Scans Private Limited Vs Konica Minolta Business Solutions Indi ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
2026:MHC:863IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR and C.M.P.Nos.3968 and 3970 of 2026 Aarthi Scans Private Limited, Represented by its Director Dr.J.Prasanna Vignesh No.15, Amman Kovil Street Vadapalani, Chennai - 600026 ... Petitioner vs. Konica Minolta Business Solutions India Private Limited 180, Capital Towers Kodambakkam High Rd Tirumurthy Nagar, Nungambakkam Chennai, Tamil Nadu-600034.Also at : 10th Floor, DLF Cyber City Building No.8, Tower C Phase-II, Gurgaon, Haryana-122002. ... Respondent PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 03.02.2026 passed in C.O.S.(S.R.).No.63 of 2026 by the learned Principal Commercial Court, Egmore, Chennai and consequently, direct the Commercial Court, Chennai to number the suit and take up the interim applications filed by the Petitioner/Plaintiff for interim injunction and interim mandatory, filed as against ...
Tvl Micro Technology Enterprises Vs Assistant Commissioner(ST),
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and WMP Nos.7210 & 7212 of 2026 Tvl Micro Technology Enterprises Represented by its Partners, Mrs. Radhika Premkumar and Mr. Ponraj Muthukamatchi, No. 26, Kuppusamy street, Balaji Nagar, Padi, Chennai 600050 ..Petitioner(s) Vs Assistant Commissioner(ST), Padi Assessment Circle, Integrated Commercial Taxes and Registration Department Building, Room No. 426, 4th floor, Nandanam, Chennai -600035. ..Respondent(s)Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the Order under Form GST DRC -07 bearing Reference No. ZD3306253083699 dated 27.06.2025, issued by the respondent and quash the same and to remand back to the respondent and direct the respondent to pass fresh orders in accordance with law For Petitioner(s): M/s.C.BoscoFor Respondent(s): Mr.C.Harsharaj Special Government P...
G.KARTHIKEYAN Vs The State Represented by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN G.Karthikeyan ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, ..Respondent(s) Criminal Revision filed under Section 438 and 442 of BNSS, praying to call for the records pertaining to the order dated 09.12.2025 passed in Criminal M.P.No.1212 of 2025 in C.C.No.33 of 2025 by the learned Judicial Magistrate II, Mayiladurai and set aside the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Ruban Prabu For Respondent(s): MR.R.VINOTHRAJA GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE (CRIMINAL SIDE)ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect. Page1 of 2SUNDER MOHAN, J.ANU2. In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learnedcounsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Revision Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 27-02-2026 Index: ...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »