Chennai Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P.S.Kannan vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP No. 6534 of 2026 P.S.Kannan ..Petitioner(s) Vs.1. The District Collector2. The Public Inormation Tahsildar Office Kundrathur Kanchipuram. District.3. The Appellate Authority The District Collectorate Kanchipuram District. ..Respondent(s)Prayer : This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 and 3 to dispose of the Appeal filed Under Right to Information Act dated 22.11.2025 and also Application under RTI Act dated 08.10.2025 pending before the 2 nd and 3rd respondent respectively. For Petitioner(s) : S.Selvaraj For Respondent(s) : Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal Addl.Govt.Pleader Page1 of 4ORDERThe Petitioner has moved this Court seeking a direction to respondent Nos.2 & 3 to dispose of the appeal filed by him under the Right to Information Act.2. When the matter was taken up for admission, taking ...
J. Ravi (Died), 1. Sakila Vs M.Gnana Arasu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CMP No. 5132 of 2026, CMP No. 5136 of 2026, and CMP No. 5138 of 2026 in SA SR No. 9006 of 2019 Vs Page1 of 6 CMP No. 5136 of 2026 Vs SA SR No. 9006 of 2019 J.Ravi (deceased) Vs Page2 of 6 CMP No. 5138 of 2026 Vs To accept the cause title in the Second Appeal S.A.SR.No.9006/2019 against the decree and judgment passed in A.S.No.19/2016 dated 31.07.2018 by the Honble Subordinate Judge, Tiruvallur and thus render justice. CMP No. 5136 of 2026 To declare the 3rd petitioner as major in the Second Appeal Page3 of 6 S.A.SR.No.9006/2019 against the decree and judgment passed in A.S.No.19/2016 dated 31.07.2018 by the Honble Subordinate Judge, Tiruvallur and thus render justice. CMP No. 5138 of 2026 To discharge the 1st petitioner from the guardianship for the 3rd petitioner in the Second Appeal S.A.SR.No.9006/2019 against the decree andjudgment passed in A.S.No.19/2016 dated 31.07.2018 by ...
Tmt.Nalini, Vs The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE1. Tmt.Nalini, Petitioner(s) Vs1. The District Collector,2.The District Revenue officer, 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, 4.The Tahsildar, Thirupporur Taluk, Chengalpattu District. 5.The Managing Trustee, Nemmilli Sri Alavandar Trust, Mahabalipuram, Chengalpet-603104 Respondent(s) PRAYER Direct the respondent to issue a Patta infavour of the petitioner and legal heirs of the deceased Subburam Lala in respect of Property extend an extent of 34.07.5 Hectares or 84.20 Acres situated at S.No.2/1A (2.49.5), S.No.2/1A3A (21.49.0),S.No.2/1A3C (8.70.0) S.No.8/1 (0.50.5) S.No.41/2 (0.88.5),Saluvankupam Village, Thirupporur Taluk,Kancheepuram District now Chengalpattu District based on the petitioners representation dated 26.12.2025 with in time limit stipulated by this CourtFor Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Anand for Mr.R.Subburaj For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander,SGP For R1 to R4 Mr.S.Ravichandran F...
Muniammal Vs STATE REP.BY, the inspector of police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Muniammal ..Petitioner(s) Vs STATE REP.BY, the inspector of police Cr.No.336 of 2025. ..Respondent(s)To amend the provisions of law under Section 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS Act read with 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act instead of under Section 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 353(1) of BNS Act read with 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act in connection with crime no.336 of 2025 in Crl OP.No.1373 of 2026 in order dated For Petitioner(s): M/s.K.Nagarajan For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed seeking to amend the order in Crl.O.P.No. 1373 of 2026 dated 29/01/2026 by including the offence under Sections as 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS Act read with 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act instead of under Section 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 353(1) of BNS Act read with 4 of Tam...
S.Kumar alias Sivakumar Vs G.David Ajay Kumar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL in CS NO. 109 OF 20251. S.Kumar alias Sivakumar 57 years, S/o.P.Sakthi No.22, JC Layout HUramanu, Bangalor-560113 Applicant(s) Vs1. G.David Ajay Kumar Plot No.77, Ganesh Residency, Street No.8, Sneha Nagar Colony, Secunderabad 500 007. Respondent(s) CS No. 109 of 20251. G.David Ajay Kumar and 5 othersPlot No.77, Ganesh Residency, Street No.8, Sneha Nagar Colony, Secunderabad 500 007. 2.P.David Christopher Q. No.3, Police Quarters, Palavancha Mandalam 507 115. 3.Samuel T Vallaimmalpuram, Santhanakulam, Thoothukudi 628 704. 4.Anandapaul A No.6(2) Throubathi Amman Kovil 1st Street, K Pudhur, Madurai North 625 007. 5.A.Lincoln Nagar, Post, Dharapuram, Tiruppur 6.Ayyala Danam 1-2-335/2 Rehmath Nagar, Kazipet, Hanamkonda, Warangal 506 001. Plaintiff(s) Vs1. The Church of South India2.Church of South India Trust Association a registered company represented by its Directors, CSI Synod Secretara...
M.Kandasamy Vs Sellam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
C.M.P.No.5834 of 2026 in C.M.A.SR.No.157519 of 2025K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to condone the delay of 97 days in representing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. Having been satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, delay is condoned and this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. 27.02.2026 mrr Note: Registry is directed to number C.M.A.SR.No.157519 of 2025, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
A.Gnanasekaran Vs the Deputy Registrar of Cooperative societies
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN and W.M.P.No.6554 of 20261. A.Gnanasekaran S/o. Aruldoss, No.33-A, Sunnambukara Street, Sirukadambur, Gingee Taluk, Petitioner(s) Vs1. the Deputy Registrar of Cooperativesocieties Tindivanam Circle, Tindivanam , 2.The Administrator Melokkaru primary agricultural cooperative credit society, Melolakkur, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram district 3.The Administrator Neganur Primary Agricultural cooperative credit society, Neganur, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram district Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of certiorari, calling for the entire records relating to the impugnedorder passed by the 1st respondent in his proceedings E.P. No. 58/ 2012- 2013in Form No. 14(b) dated 20.01.2026 and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Murthy Government Advocate for R1 Mr.V.Veeramani Government Ad...
K.Abhaya Kumar vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN and WMP.Nos.6493, 6502 & 39265 of 2025 K.Abhaya Kumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs.1. The District Collector Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District.2. Tahsildar Kundrtur Taluk, Kundrahur, Chennai.3. The Municipal Commissioner, Mangadu Municipality, No. 5 Vaikunda Perumal Street, Mangadu, Chennai 600 122.4. The Municipal Administration And Water Supply Department, Mangadu, Kancheepurm District.5. The Civil Supplies And Consume Protection Department, Mangadu, Kancheepuram District.6. The Executive Officer Mangadu Town Panchayat, Mandgadu, Chennai.7. The Village Administrative Officer, Mangadu B Village, Kancheepuram District. ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 15Prayer: This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 3rd respondent bearing resolution no. 753 dated 23.12.24 permitting the use of land...
M.Shankar vs the Sub Registrar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY1. M.Shankar S/o.Manibalan, No.149, South Street, Annavalli Village, Cuddalore Taluk, Cuddalore District.2. P.SelvamS/o.Parasuraman, P.G.Avenue, 5th Street, Kattupakkam, Poonamallee, Tiruvallur District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent to release the petitioners sale deed dated 09.01.2026 registered as Document No.P/ Avarapakkam/ 24/ 2026 within a time frame as may be fixed by this Honble Court.Page1 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Kumaralingam For Respondent(s): Ms.Akila Rajendran, Government Advocate ***********ORDERThe petitioner states that one Vincent K.Thomas acquired title over the property described in paragraph 2 of the affidavit in support of this writ petition and executed sale deed dated 09.01.2026 in favour of the petitio...
Shanthi Vs State by, Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR in 1.Shanthi2. Sathya Surya3. Sandeep MR ..... Petitioner/Accused Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Coimbatore . ... Respondent (Crime No.702 of 2025) For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : M/s.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side) **********ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.457 of 2026 on 19.01.2026. Page No.1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.Sma2. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that, the petitioner is complying with the condition regularly imposed by this Court.3. Considering the said submission and reasons stated in the affidavit,the condition imposed on the petitioner is relaxed. However, it is made clear that, the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. 27.02.2026 Index : Yes/NoSpeaking Order/Non Speaking OrderSma...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »