Chennai Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.Usharani, Vs K. Balan (Deceased) 1.B.Nagarathinam,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASJudgment reserved on : 16.02.2026 Judgment pronounced on : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI Rev.Appl.No.56 of 2026 1.M.Usharani 2.V.Mohan .. Applicants Vs. K.Balan (Deceased) 1.B.Nagarathinam 2.B.Loganathan 3.M.Latha 4.M.Meena 5.B.Selva Kumar 6.B.Karthikeyan .. Respondents Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 of CPC r/w Section 114 of CPC, to review the order dated 14.11.2025 passed by this Court in CRP.No.2716 of 2023. For Petitioners : Mr.L.DhamodharanORDERThe petitioners in CRP.No.2716 of 2023 have come up with the present review application. 2.I have heard Mr.L.Dhamodharan, learned counsel for the review applicants.3.Mr.L.Dhamodharan, learned counsel appearing for the review applicants would primarily contend that the suit was one for bare injunction and there was no decree for removal of encroachment or for recovery of possession and therefore, the executing Court did not have jurisdi...
M.Jayakumar Vs The Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGANand W.M.P.No.6748 of 2026 M.Jayakumar S/o.Margabandhu, Melkavanur Village and Post, K.V.Kuppam Taluk, Vellore District. Petitioner Vs 1.The Secretary to Government Secretariat, St. George Fort, Chennai. 2.The Secretary Public Works Department, Secretariate, St. George Fort, Chennai-9 3.The District Collector Vellore District, 4.The Executive Engineer Mel Palaru Vadunila Kottam, 5.The Executive Engineer State High Ways Department, 6.The Tahsildar 7.The Panchayat President Kavanur Panchayat, RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 5 to consider the petitioner representation dated 08.09.2025 made along with village people and stop the proposed construction of underground canal in North side downstream of the lake...
Naveen Kumar O vs the Union Territory of Puducherry
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Naveen Kumar O ... Petitioner Vs. Puducherry. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to revive and complete the recruitment process pursuant to Notification No.151-3/ IGMC&RI/Estt./Rec.-Paramed/2014 dated 19.11.2014 or in the alternative to consider the petitioners candidature for appointment to the Post of Lab Technician by granting age relaxation in accordance with Government Order dated 04.02.2015. For Petitioner : Mr.J.N.Naresh Kumar For Respondents : Ms.Sharadha Vivek Additional Government Pleader (P)ORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect in the bundle. 2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petiti...
M/S. Shanthi vs Mr. M. Nagarajan (Deceased)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL 1.Shanthi 2.K.Anandavel(Died) 3.K.Kumaravel 4.K.Arulvel 5.A.Ambika 6.Jegadeeswaran 7.A.Thiruveni (Appellants 5 to 7 are brought on record aslegalheirs of the deceased A2 vide court orderdated 22.10.2024 made in CMPNos.22098n 2099 and 22100 of 2024) ..Appellant(s) Vs M.Nagarajan(Deceased) 1.M.Subbulakshmi 2.Mohana 3.Amudha 4.M.Bhaskar 5.Bharathi 6.M.Venkatesan 7.M.Prabakaran 8.Dhanasekaran 9.M.kalaivanan 10.Pankajam 11.N.Sangeetha 12.N.Karthick ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure as against the judgment and decree dated 21.04.2017 made in AS No.484 of 2008 on the file of the VI Additional City Civil Court, Chennai by reversing the judgment and decree in O.S.No.2405 of 2002 dated Page1 of 1406.06.2008 on the file of the II Assistant Civil Court, Chennai and allow the appeal For Appellant(s): M/s.Kumar Rajan For R1 to R4 N...
N.Bhupesh Vs S.Siva
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
Application No.971 of 2026 in Arbitration Original Petition (Com.Div.) Dr.No.17007 of 2026 N.ANAND VENKATESH, J This application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 278 days in representing the case papers in the above petition.2. Heard learned counsel for applicant.3. Satisfied with the reasonsassigned in the affidavit filed in support of the application, this application is allowed and the delay of 278 days in representing the case papers in the above petition, is condoned. Registry is directed to number the main petition, if it is otherwise in order. 27.02.2026 gm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Mujeebur Rahman Vs The Government of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA Mujeebur Rahman S/o.Abdul Latheef No.28,Kil Govindhan street, Kandhal,Udhagamandalam, ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Government of Tamilnadu Rep by its Additional chief secretary to the Government Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments Department, Secretariat, Fort st.George, Chennai-600 009.2. The Collector collectorate, Udhagamandalam(ooty)3. The Regional Manager Tamilnadu Tourism Development corporation Udhagamandlaam(ooty)4. The ManagerTamilnadu Tourism Development corporation Board House, Udhagamandalam(Ooty) ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the Eviction Notice No.340/P.E./Ooty/2025 dated 26.12.2025 issued Page1 of 6 by the 4th respondent and quash the same as illegal and direct the 4th respondent to permit the petitioner to carry on in...
N.Bhupesh, Vs S.Siva
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
Application No.974 of 2026 in Arbitration Original Petition (Com.Div.) Dr.No.17018 of 2026 N.ANAND VENKATESH, J This application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 277 days in representing the case papers in the above petition.2. Heard learned counsel for applicant.3. Satisfied with the reasonsassigned in the affidavit filed in support of the application, this application is allowed and the delay of 277 days in representing the case papers in the above petition, is condoned. Registry is directed to number the main petition, if it is otherwise in order. 27.02.2026 gm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
V.LENIN Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN V.Lenin S/o. Veeraragavan, No.345, Paper Mills Road, Perambur, ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police ..Respondent(s) Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 438 r/w Section 442 of BNSS, praying set aside the order dated 03.09.2025 made in Crl.M.P.No.11659 of 2025 on the file of the XIII Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai 08 and pleased to direct the Inspector of Police to register the complaint dated 26.04.2025. For Petitioner(s): M/S.M.MANOJKUMAR For Respondent(s): MR.R.VINOTHRAJA GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE (CRIMINAL SIDE) Page1 of 4ORDERThe present Revision challenges the dismissal of the petition filed under Section 175(3) BNSS., seeking a direction to the police to register an F.I.R on the complaint given by the petitioner.2. The gist of the petitioners complaint is that the proposed accused hadborrowed a sum of Rs.2,30,000/- in the year 2018; t...
ARJUNRAJ Vs State by, Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
Crl.M.P.No.2924 of 2026 in Crl.A.SR.No.6756 of 2026SUNDER MOHAN, J.This petition is filed to condone the delay of 90 days in preferring the appeal in Crl.A.Sr.No.6756 of 2026 against the conviction in S.C.No.30 of 2024 by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ariyalur, vide judgment dated 12.09.2025.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Balaji, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay stands condoned and the petition is ordered. 27.02.2026 Anu Note: Registry is directed to number this Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order. 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
V.Sundaramoorthy Vs Anusuya Ramani Boopathy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR and C.M.P.No.3660 of 2026 1.V.Sundaramoorthy 2.Amutha @ Amuthavalli 3.V.Arumugam ... Petitioners vs. 1.Anusuya Ramani Boopathy, W/o.Ramani Boopathy, No.66, Uppukara Street, Ariankuppam, Pondicherry 605 007. Rep. by her Power Agent R.Boopathy, S/o.Ramasamy, No.11, Drowpathiamman Koil Street, Ariankuppam, Pondicherry 605 007. 2.Selva Jaya 3.Ponnammal @ Rajavalli 4.Harikrishnan 5.Periyannan 6.Palanivel 7.Mahalakshmi 8.Moganasunitha, Minor D/o.Late Rajaraman9.Preethika Minor Respondents 8 and 9 rep. by next friend Mother Mahalakshmi D/o.Late Rajaraman, R7 to R9 are residing at No.1, Pallivasal Street, Thottakkal Main Road, Karamanikuppam, Mudaliarpet, Pondicherry 605 004. 10.Mohandass 11.A.Sundaramoorthy 12.P.Mandiramoorthy 13.M.Vijayakumar 14.R.Shanmugam 15.R.Ravi ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to strike off the p...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »