Skip to content

Chennai Court January 2026 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jan 30 2026

M.Mahesh vs the Additional Chief Secretary

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jan-30-2026

W.P.No.566 of 2026M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J.Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, learned Additional Public Prosecutor takes notice for the respondents 1 & 2. Mrs.S.S.Meenakumary, learned counsel takes notice for R3 to R5.2. The learned counsel for therespondents 3 to 5 submitted that the petitioner is laying a pipeline through the public pathway not for agricultural purposes, but for the benefit of his sago industry. It is further submitted that such laying of the pipeline affects the rights of the private respondents and also causes disturbance to their agricultural activities. o disturbing the agricultural works. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not laying the pipeline through any private lands and that the same is being carried out only after obtaining appropriate permission from the Government authorities.4. Post on 07.04.2026 for filing counter of R3 to R5. 16.03.2026 rkp https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


Jan 30 2026

Vishnumanoj Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-30-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR1. Vishnumanoj 204. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police 204.CSCID - Coimbatore, Salem. Respondent(s) PRAYER To grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner in connection with Crime No. 324 of 2025 pending investigation on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.R.Rajagopal Senior Advocate for Lamech Indian For Respondent(s): M/S.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 2(e)(v), 2(e)(vi), 2(e)(ix) of Motor Spirit & High Speed Diesel (Regulation of Supply and Distribution and Prevention of Malpractices) order 1998 r/w. Section 7(1)(a) of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 in Crime No. 324 of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is having abrowser for distribution...


Jan 30 2026

M.M.MANOKARAN Vs The District Collector

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-30-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 2527 of 2026 AND WMP NO. 2759 OF 2026 M.M.Manokaran ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The District Collector2. The District Revenue officer Salem District, Salem-636 001.3. The Revenue Divisional officer4. The Tahsildar5. Selvam6. Shembagi ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 5directing the respondents 1 to 4 to cancel the joint patta issued by the 4th respondent in patta No.227 dated 17.12.2015 in the name of the 5th and 6th respondents in respect of the water stream (Odai) in R.s. No.51/3, Moolakaadu Village, mettur Taluk, Salem District to an extent of 0.27.00 hectares, based on petitioner representation dated 29.09.2025 and 13.10.2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.K.M.AppajiFor Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam Govt Advocate For R1 to R4OrderThis writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 to 4 to cancel the joint patta issued by the fourth respondent in patta No.227 dated 17....


Jan 30 2026

K.PANDIYAN Vs The District collector

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-30-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 2560 of 2026 AND WMP NO. 2804 OF 2026 R.Pandiyan ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The District collector2. The District Revenue officer3. The Revenue Divisional officer4. The Tahsildar5. The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar Page1 of 76. Chennaiyan..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to cancel patta Nos.2750 and 2752 and consequently and direct the 4th respondent herein to restore the patta No.2515 which stood in petitioner name for the property comprised in S.No.493/5 measuring an extent of 19 Ares and S.No.492/2A measuring an extent of 19.50 Ares situated at Chinnathimminayanapalli, Bargur Taluk, Krishnagiri District and further direct the 4th and 5th respondents herein to consider petitioner application bearing For Petitioner(s): Ms..A.Aishwarya for Mr.R.Mahesh NandhuFor Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander Govt Advocate For R1 to R5OrderThis wri...


Jan 30 2026

Kalaivanan Vs V. Devika

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-30-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CRP No. 347 of 2026 and CMP.No.1968 of 2026 Kalaivanan ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. V. Devika2. R.D. Selvi3. R.D. Mohanavel4. R.D. Uma Shankar5. R.D. Arun Shankar6. R.D. Mothi Shankar Ellammal (Died)7. The Sub Registrar Purasawalkam SRO, Briklin Road, Otteri,Chennai 12.8. The Inspector General of Registration Santhome,Chennai 04.9. The Assistant Engineer Nammalwarpet, Kilpauk,TNEB, Chennai 10. Page1 of 510.The Chairman TNEB, Annasalai, 11.The Asst. Engineer CMWSSB, Venkatadri Street, 12.The Chairman CMWSSB, ..Respondent(s) Prayer: The civil revision petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India praying to set aside the impugned order dated 11.12.2025 in I.A.No.7 of 2025 in O.S.No.202 of 2021 pending on the file of VII Assistant City Civil Court at Chennai. For Petitioner(s): M/s.Ravindra Ram For Respondent(s): Mr.N.Muthuvel for R7 & R8 Govt.Advocate(CS)ORDERThe civil revision ...


Jan 30 2026

Ishwarya Lakshmi vs Priya @ Sivaranjani

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jan-30-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHANIshwarya Lakshmi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Priya @ Sivaranjani 2.The State of Tamilnadu rep by The Inspector of Police, in Crime No.9 of 2024. ... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, 2023, to condone the delay of 91 days against the order dated 19.06.2025 passed in CMP.No.1083 of 2024 on the file of learned Principal District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kurunjipadi in filing the present Criminal Revision Petition in Crl.R.C.SR.No.101345 of 2025. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Jeyamohan For Respondent : Mr.K.Senthilkumar for R1 Mr.R.Vinothraja, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for R2ORDERThe Revision challenges the order allowing the protest petition filed by the first respondent herein against the final report filed by the second respondent. The instant Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 91 days in filing the Revision. 2.The learne...


Jan 30 2026

S.Kalarani, vs the Secretary to Government,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-30-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN IN WP No. 24353 of 2013 S.Kalarani, W/o.S.Mukuntha Madhavan, TB-2, New TNHB, I Phase, Royakottai Road, Krishnagiri 635 105. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Secretary To Government, Labour And Employment Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.2. The District Employment Officer, Employment Office, Palayapettai, Krishnagiri 635 001.3. The Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Krishnagiri Region, C/o.L.D.Bank, Cooperative Colony, Krishnagiri 635 001. ..Respondent(s)Prayer in WMP No. 56674 of 2025: This Writ Miscellaneous Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to modify the Operative Portion of the order dated 07.03.2025 made in WP.No. 24353 of 2013 to the effect that the petitioner is deemed to have been appointed with effect from the Page1 of 7date on which her immediate Junior one Mr.P.Arumugam or Mr.T.Murugan who were appointed based on their acquisition of ...


Jan 30 2026

MAGAM VINAY VARDHAN Vs The Commissioner of Police

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-30-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.01.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA and Crl.M.P.No.24787 of 2025 Magam Vinay Vardhan ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Police Office of the Commissionerate, Vepery, Chennai 600 007 2.The State Rep.by The Inspector of Police Central Crime Branch-1, Job Rocketing Investigation Wing, Vepery, Chennai 600 007 ...Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita/Section 482 Cr.P.C., to issue a direction to the respondents to cancel the Lookout Notice issued against the Petitioner / 2 nd Accused Passport No.T9699380 in Crime No.16 of 2025.For Petitioner : Mr.R.John Sathiyan, Senior Counsel for Mr.R.Jayaprakash For Respondents : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent to cancel the Lookout Notice issued against the petitioner (Passport No.T9699380) in Crime No.16 of 2...


Jan 30 2026

Larsen and Toubro Construction Limited, Vs Fast Reactor Fuel Cycle Fac ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-30-2026

1 A No. 424 of 2026IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESHLarsen and Toubro Construction Limited, Rep. by its Power of Attorney Holder, Mr.R.Lakshmanan, Having its Registered Office, L and T House, Narottam Morarji Marg, Ballard Estate, Mumbai - 400 001. Having its Construction Division Headquarters, P.B.No.979, Mount Poonamalle Road, Manapakkam, Chennai - 600 089. Applicant(s) Vs Rep. by its Project Director, Formerly called Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research, Presently called Nuclear Recycle Board, Department of Atomic Energy, Kalpakkam, Tamil Nadu. Respondent(s)PRAYER Application filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of the Original Side Rules read with Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to pass anorder granting extension of time for conclusion of the on-going arbitrationproceedings between the Applicant and the Respondent before the Arbitral Tribunal by a period of six months from the expiry...


Jan 30 2026

V.Muthusamy vs the Inspector General of Registration

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-30-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY V.Muthusamy S/o.Late R.Venkatachalam, Door No.345/47, Karupanna Gounder Layout, V.K.Road, Peelamedu, Coimbatore- 641 004. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Inspector General Of Registration Registration Department Head Office, 100 Santhome Road, Chennai-028.2. The District Registrar Thiruppur District Registration Office, No.1, Nerupperichal Village, Thiruppur District- 641 602.3. The Sub Registrar4. N.Gomathi Devi5. A.Badhurnisha6. A.Venkitasamy Page1 of 67. S.Sumathi W/o.Late Srinivasan,8. S.Rahul S/o.Late Srinivasan,9. S.Haris SiniS/o.Late Srinivasan, 10.V.Venkatachalam S/o.late.Veerappa Chettiar (a) Veerappan, 11.V.Selvi W/o.V.Venkatachalam, Page2 of 6 12.V.Chandru S/o.V.Venkatachalam, 13.V.Santhosh S/o.V.Venkatachalam, 14.V.Krishnan S/o.late.Velappachettiar, No.109, Commercial Road, Manikandan Station Bank Line, Udhagamandalam Town and Taluk, Nigiri District- 643 001. 15.K.Ma...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial