Chennai Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nadhamuni (Died) 1. Arumugam Vs E.C.Krishnan(Died), 1.Govindamma
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
C.M.P.Nos.32193, 32194 & 32197 of 2025 in S.A. No. 276 of 2014DR. A.D. MARIA CLETE, J These petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 1002 days in setting aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased fourth respondent, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased fourth respondent and to bring on record the L.R.s of the deceased fourth respondent respectively. 2.Heard Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr.R.Bharath Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents 6 to 9, R10, R12 to R14 and Mr.K.S.Navin Balaji, learned counsel for the respondents 15 to 27 who submits that they have got no serious objection in allowing these petitions. There is no appearance for R11. 3.Considering the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of these petitions which sets out the relationship of the proposed parties with the deceased and on being satisfied that the proposed parties represent the estate of the deceased within the me...
K.PAKIYAM Vs The Superintendent of Central Prison for Women,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRAK.Pakiyam ..Petitioner Vs The Superintendent of Central Prison for Women, Puzhal, Chennai - 600 066. ..Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, seeking to pass an order to run concurrently the judgement in C.C.No.295 of 2016 dated 19.01.2023 on the file of I-Additional Special Court for NDPS Act Cases Madurai (FAC) with the judgement in C.C.No.4 of 2018 dated 27.05.2022 on the file of Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under NDPS Act, Chennai by considering the representation dated 29.11.2025 to secure the ends of justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Sankarasubbu For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking an order that the sentence imposed vide judgment dated 19.01.2023 in C.C.No.295 of 2016 on the file of the I Additional Special Court for NDPS Act Cases, Madu...
Nadhamuni (Died) 1. Arumugam vs E.C.Krishnan(Died), 1.Govindamma
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
C.M.P.Nos.32207, 32208 & 32454 of 2025 in S.A. No. 276 of 2014DR. A.D. MARIA CLETE, J These petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 2364 days in setting aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased second appellant, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased second appellant and to bring on record the L.R.s of the deceased second appellant respectively. 2.Heard Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr.R.Bharath Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents 6 to 9, R10, R12 to R14 and Mr.K.S.Navin Balaji, learned counsel for the respondents 15 to 27 who submits that they have got no serious objection in allowing these petitions. There is no appearance for R11. 3.Considering the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of these petitions which sets out the relationship of the proposed parties with the deceased and on being satisfied that the proposed parties represent the estate of the deceased within the meani...
Nadhamuni (Died) 1. Arumugam Vs E.C.Krishnan(DIED), 1.Govindamma
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
C.M.P.Nos.31997, 32000 & 32004 of 2025 in S.A. No. 276 of 2014DR. A.D. MARIA CLETE, J These petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 3204 days in setting aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased fourth appellant, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased fourth appellant and to bring on record the L.R.s of the deceased fourth appellant respectively. 2.Heard Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr.R.Bharath Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents 6 to 9, R10, R12 to R14 and Mr.K.S.Navin Balaji, learned counsel for the respondents 15 to 27 who submits that they have got no serious objection in allowing these petitions. There is no appearance for R11. 3.Considering the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of these petitions which sets out the relationship of the proposed parties with the deceased and on being satisfied that the proposed parties represent the estate of the deceased within the meani...
Nadhamuni (Died) 1. Arumugam vs E.C.Krishnan(Died), 1.Govindamma
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
C.M.P.Nos.32531, 32532 & 32005 of 2025 in S.A. No. 276 of 2014DR. A.D. MARIA CLETE, J These petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 1424 days in setting aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased second respondent, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased second respondent and to bring on record the L.R.s of the deceased second respondent respectively. 2.Heard Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr.R.Bharath Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents 6 to 9, R10, R12 to R14 and Mr.K.S.Navin Balaji, learned counsel for the respondents 15 to 27 who submits that they have got no serious objection in allowing these petitions. There is no appearance for R11. 3.Considering the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of these petitions which sets out the relationship of the proposed parties with the deceased and on being satisfied that the proposed parties represent the estate of the deceased within the me...
Nadhamuni (Died) 1.Arumugam Vs E.C.Krishnan(Died), 1.Govindamma
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
C.M.P.Nos.32783, 32784 & 32786 of 2025 in S.A. No. 276 of 2014DR. A.D. MARIA CLETE, J These petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 1281 days in setting aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased first appellant, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased first appellant and to bring on record the L.R.s of the deceased first appellant respectively. 2.Heard Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr.R.Bharath Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents 6 to 9, R10, R12 to R14 and Mr.K.S.Navin Balaji, learned counsel for the respondents 15 to 27 who submits that they have got no serious objection in allowing these petitions. There is no appearance for R11. 3.Considering the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of these petitions which sets out the relationship of the proposed parties with the deceased and on being satisfied that the proposed parties represent the estate of the deceased within the meaning ...
Nadhamuni 1. Arumugam vs E.C.Krishnan(Died), 1.Govindamma
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
C.M.P.Nos.32036, 31993 & 32007 of 2025 in S.A. No. 276 of 2014DR. A.D. MARIA CLETE, J These petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 462 days in setting aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased sixth appellant, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased sixth appellant and to bring on record the L.R.s of the deceased sixth appellant respectively. 2.Heard Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr.R.Bharath Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents 6 to 9, R10, R12 to R14 and Mr.K.S.Navin Balaji, learned counsel for the respondents 15 to 27 who submits that they have got no serious objection in allowing these petitions. There is no appearance for R11. 3.Considering the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of these petitions which sets out the relationship of the proposed parties with the deceased and on being satisfied that the proposed parties represent the estate of the deceased within the meaning o...
P.KARTHICK Vs The State by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN and Crl.M.P.Nos.22982 & 22983 of 2025 Mr.P.Karthick ...Petitioner -Vs- State Represented by The Sub-Inspector of Police, S-2, Airport Police Station, Chennai. ...RespondentPRAYER: Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 415 of the BNSS, praying to set aside the judgment passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Chengalpattu, in C.A.No.86 of 2024 dated 17.11.2025 and the same confirming in C.C.No.878 of 2020 dated 29.08.2024 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Alandur. For Petitioner : Mr.A.P.Sathya Murthy For Respondent : Mr.R.Vinoth Raja, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioner has preferred the present Criminal Revision Case challenging the judgment dated 17.11.2025 passed in Crl.A.No.86 of 2024 by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Chengalpattu, confirming thejudgment of the learned Magistrate convicting the pe...
S.C.Raman, vs Mr. V.Gunasekaran,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR S.C.Raman, (Rtd Staff EF5080) S/o. Chinnathambi Goundar, Sevalanur, Pottaneri Post, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. ... Petitioner vs Salem 636 007. Respondent Prayer: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Honble Court in W.P.No.10394 of 2023 dated 03.04.2023 as per the Contempt of Court Act and pass orders. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Desinghu For Respondent : Mr.K.Raja Standing CounselORDERThe learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submitted that the order of this Court dated 03.04.2023 in W.P.No.10394 of 2023 has been complied with by the respondent.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid submission made by the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent.3. In view of the aforesaid submission, as the respondent/authorit...
Lavanya vs K.Agoram
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.D. MARIA CLETE Tr.C.M.P. No. 1344 of 2025 and C.M.P. No. 31239 of 2025 Mrs. Lavanya D/o. K.N. Pulikesi, W/o. K. Agoram, PetitionerVersusK. Agoram S/o. A. Karthikeyan, Respondent Prayer in Tr.C.M.P. No. 1344 of 2025 Transfer Petition under Section 24 of C.P.C., to withdraw H.M.O.P. No. 48 of 2025 pending on the file of the Sub Court, Sirkazhi and transfer the same to the file of the Sub Court, Tiruvarur. Prayer in C.M.P. No. 31239 of 2025 To grant interim stay of all further proceedings in H.M.O.P. No. 48 of 2025 on the file of the Sub Court, Sirkazhi, pending disposal of the Transfer Petition. For Petitioner :M/s. S. Venkatesan For Respondent: Mr.P.Muthamizh SelvakumarORDER1. Heard .2. The petitioner is the wife and the respondent is the husband. The marriage between the parties was solemnised on 27.03.2023 and it is stated that no child is born through the wedlock.3. The respondent/husband ha...
- ‹ Prev
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- Next ›
- Last »