Chennai Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ammani Ammal(Died) S.Rajan, Vs S.Mani,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
C.M.P.Nos.1425 & 1335 of 2026 in A.S.SR.Nos.20871 & 20872 of 2022P.B.BALAJI, J.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner though the delay in representation are 1338 and 1358 days respectively, the petitioner, in their sworn affidavit has satisfactory explained the delay in representing the appeals. The delay in representation is condoned.2. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are ordered. 30.01.2026 Jeni https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Management of Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Vilupuram Ltd ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
C.M.P.No.31451 of 2025 in W.A.Sr.No.141725 of 2025S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.andC.KUMARAPPAN, J.[Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.] In view of the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is ordered and the delay of 147 days in filing the above appeal is condoned. (S.M.S.,J.) (C.K.,J.) 30.01.2026 dsa https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
S.Lavanya vs K.Sundararajan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D. MARIA CLETE Tr.C.M.P. No. 1360 of 2025 S.Lavanya .. Petitioner-versus-K. Sundararajan .. Respondent Prayer in Tr.C.M.P. No.1360 of 2025: Transfer H.M.O.P. No.1097 of 2024 pending on the file of the VI Additional Family Court, Chennai, to the file of the Family Court, Krishnagiri. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Naresh For Respondent :Ms.Sivakami Shanmugam PillaiORDER1. Heard .2. The petitioner is the wife. The respondent is the husband. The respondent has filed H.M.O.P. No.1097 of 2024 before the VI Additional Family Court, Chennai, seeking dissolution of marriage.3. The petitioner states that the marriage between the parties was solemnizedon 13.02.2011 at Krishnagiri and that a female child, Dhanuja Sri, was born on 22.11.2015 and the child is in the custody of the petitioner. The petitioner further states that the respondent is employed at Chennai, whereas the petitioner has no independent income and ...
MANOGARAN Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in Crl.A.No.1783 of 2025 Manogaran ... Petitioner Vs. The State Represented by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District. Crime No.08 of 2020 ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 430(2) of BNSS, praying to suspend the sentence made in Spl.C.C.No.39 of 2021 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Namakkal, dated 06.11.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.W.Camyles Gandhi For Respondent : Mr.S.Raja Kumar, Additional Public ProsecutorORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner by judgment dated 06.11.2025 passed in Spl.C.C.No.39 of 2021 by the learned Sessions Judge, Magalir Neethimandram (Fast Track Mahila Court), Namakkal, pending disposal of the above criminal appeal and enlarge the petitioner on bai...
P.James, Vs Dr. D.Karthikeyan, I.A.S., and another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN P.James, Computer Operator (NMR), Zone XIV, Puzhuthivakkam, Chennai - 600 091. Petitioner(s) Vs The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. Rippon Building, Chennai - 600 003. Contemnor(s) PRAYER:Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents for their wilful and intentional disobedience to theorder of this High Court passed in W.P.No. 898 of 2024 dated 13.02.2025.For Petitioner (s): Mr.R.Kishore Kumar For Contemnor(s): Mr.R.Neethi Perumal Government Advocate For R1 Mr.S.Gopinathan For R2ORDERA copy of the proceedings dated 09.01.2026 in Po.Dhu.Na.Ka.No.G7/35531/2025 had been forwarded, whereby, all the monetary benefits have been extended to the petitioner. They had been settled on 23.01.2026. This fact is confirmed by the learned counsel fo...
IVRCL Chengapalli Tollways Limited Vs The State, The Inspector of Poli ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRL O.P. No. 1479 of 2026 IVRCL Chengapalli Tollways Limited (Wrongly mentioned as ITCL employees in the FIR) Having its register office at M-22/3RT, Vijayanagar Colony, Hyderabad - 500 057. Andhra Pradesh, India, Rep.by its Authorized Signatory, Mr.Sathyanand Bhattiprolu, Chief Financial Officer ..Petitioner Vs.1. The State rep by, The Inspector of Police, Madukkarai Police Station, Coimbatore District. Cr.No.401 of 2025.2. Praveen Kumar..Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records relating to Crime No.401 of 2025 dated 25.10.2025, on the file of the 1 st respondent and quash the same. For petitioner: Mr.John Sathyan, Senior Advocate assisted by M/s.Avinash Krishnan Ravi & Vikram Veerasamy For respondents: Mr.S.Santhosh Govt Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 Mr.Sriram Subbaraman for R2 Page1 of 6ORDERThis Criminal Original ...
Tmt. P.Vasanthakumari and 4 others Vs Tmt. R.Gajalakshmi, IAS.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN IN CONT P SR NO. 191828 OF 20251. Tmt. P.Vasanthakumari W/o. Late C.P.Pandian2. P.Venkataraman S/o. of C.P.Pandian, Both are residing at Flat SD, S.S.Arjuna Apartments, VGP Rajesh Nagar 1st Street, Pallikaranai, Chennai - 600 100.3. Tmt. P.Chitra Sri Sai Apartments No. 53/51, 3rd Street, Rajanagar, S.Kolathur, Kovilambakkam, Chennai 600 129.4. Tmt. P.Jamuna, No. 178-A, KVR Manor, Page1 of 5 7th Cross Street, Kamakotinagar, Pallikarani, Chennai 600 100.5. Tmt. P.Indira, No. 5, Flat CC, SaiAsheervad Apartments, 1st Street, SriKarumari Amman Nagar, Velachery, Chennai - 600 042. All are Legal Heirs of Late C.P.Pandian (Respondent in W.A.No. 1163 of 2011) Ex. Employee of Tamil Nadu Fisheries Development Corporation Ltd., Chennai - 35. ..Applicant(s) Vs Tmt. R.Gajalakshmi, IAS., Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Fisheries Development Corporatio...
Swaminathan vs Preethi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN and Crl.M.P.No.23169 of 2025 Swaminathan ... Petitioner Vs.1. Preethi2. Minor S.Mithra,D/o.Swaminathan, (Minor represented by her Mother / Natural Guardian 1st respondent) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Revision petition filed under Sections 438 r/w.442 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to allow the above Criminal R.C. by setting aside the order dated 06.10.2025 in M.P.No.1583 of 2025 in M.C.No.633 of 2024 on the file of the IV Additional Family Court, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Govi Ganesan For Respondents : Mr.B.Sivasubramanian for R1 and R2ORDERThe Criminal Revision Petition challenges the order dated 16.10.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1583 of 2025 in M.C.No.633 of 2024, Page No.1 of 4 in which the IV Additional Family Court, Chennai had directed the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.20,000/- as interim maintenance, Rs.39,950/- towards school expenses, the school fees and Rs.20,...
Nadhamuni (Died) 1. Arumugam vs E.C.Krishnan(Died), 1.Govindamma
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
C.M.P.Nos.32001, 32037 & 32038 of 2025 in S.A. No. 276 of 2014DR. A.D. MARIA CLETE, J These petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 2032 days in setting aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased third respondent, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased third respondent and to bring on record the L.R.s of the deceased third respondent respectively. 2.Heard Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr.R.Bharath Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents 6 to 9, R10, R12 to R14 and Mr.K.S.Navin Balaji, learned counsel for the respondents 15 to 27 who submits that they have got no serious objection in allowing these petitions. There is no appearance for R11. 3.Considering the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of these petitions which sets out the relationship of the proposed parties with the deceased and on being satisfied that the proposed parties represent the estate of the deceased within the meani...
Nadhamuni (Died)1.Arumugam Vs E.C.Krishnan(DIED), 1.Govindamma
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
C.M.P.Nos.32666, 32671 & 32674 of 2025 in S.A. No. 276 of 2014DR. A.D. MARIA CLETE, J These petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 788 days in setting aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased fifth respondent, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased fifth respondent and to bring on record the L.R.s of the deceased fifth respondent respectively. 2.Heard Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr.R.Bharath Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents 6 to 9, R10, R12 to R14 and Mr.K.S.Navin Balaji, learned counsel for the respondents 15 to 27 who submits that they have got no serious objection in allowing these petitions. There is no appearance for R11. 3.Considering the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of these petitions which sets out the relationship of the proposed parties with the deceased and on being satisfied that the proposed parties represent the estate of the deceased within the meanin...
- ‹ Prev
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- Next ›
- Last »