Chennai Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A.Muthukumaran vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE A.Muthukumaran ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The District CollectorDharmapuri Distrct, 1st Floor, The collectorate, Pennagaram Taluk office, Koothapadi Village Revenu Village, ..Respondent(s) Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the third Respondent - Tahsildar, Pennagaram Taluk, with the assistance of respondents 2 and 4, to Page1 of 4consider and dispose of the petitioners online patta transfer and subdivision application dated 28.10.2025, bearing application No 2025/ 0105 / 05/ 375949, in accordance with law, and consequently issue individual patta in respect of lands comprised in Survey Nos. 207/1, 207/2A, 209/1 and 210/1, situate at Koothapadi Village, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.Palanisamy For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Muruga...
ANAND Vs State Represented by The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR1. Anand S/o. Ramu, No.25, Mariyamman Kovil Street, S.Puthur, Ramapuram Post, Cuddalore District-607 003. Petitioner(s) Vs1. State Represented by The Inspector of Police Respondent(s)PRAYER To enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.59 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police and thus render Justice. For Petitioner(s): R.Raji For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 23.11.2025, for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(2) of BNS, 2023 r/w. Section 7, 8 of POCSO Act, in Crime No.59 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is the stepfather of the victim child aged about three years and he joined with mother and demanded the child to call him as father. Since the child has n...
GOPAL Vs The State rep by Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL MP No. 1252 of 2026 in CRL A No. 77 of 2026 Gopal S/o. Ramasamy, Melpallur Colony, Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District, Now convict Prisoner, Central Prisoner, Vellore. ... Petitioner Vs. The State represented by Inspector of Police All Women Police Station, Polur, Tiruvannamalai District. Crime No.13 of 2008. ...Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 430 (1) of BNSS Act, to suspend the sentence passed by the Session Judge, Magalir Neethimandram, Fast Track Mahila Court, Tiruvannamalai in S.C.No. 124 of 2009 dated 30.04.2025 and release the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the above Criminal Appeal. For Petitioner (s): Mr.R.Ganesh For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Raja Kumar Additional Public ProsecutorORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner in SC.No.124 of 2009 dated 30.04.2025 on the f...
M Mahalakshmi Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 29.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKARM.Mahalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs. The State rep by The Inspector of Police, Salem District. ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.464 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Siranjeevi For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThe petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 49, 318(2) of BNS 2023 r/w Section 23(1) of Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prevention of Sex Selection) Act 1994 and 34 of National Medical Commission Act, 2019 in Crime No.464 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail.2. Earlier, this Court dismissed the petitioners bail petition on17.12.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.34486 of 2025 on the following reaso...
S.AHMED NASRIN Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
Crl.MP.No.1092 of 2026 in Crl.OP.SR.No.2833 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.Dispense with ordered.2. Registry is directed to number the criminal original petition, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission in due course. 29.01.2026 skt https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
P.Nagaraju Vs The State of Tamil, Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI P.Nagaraju S/o parasuraman, 3rd street, Pattanam, Ondipudur via, Sulur T.K Coimbatore district 641 016 ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The State of Tamil, Nadu Rep by its Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Secretariat, Fort St George, Chennai 92. Chief Engineer (buildings) and chief Engineer (General)3. The Engineer - in - chief (EIC) Water Resources Organization (WRO) ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 6Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking to issue a Writ of mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to determine appropriate seniority of the petitioner in the Assistant Executive Engineer post, thereby including the petitioner in the 2003-2004 promotion panel for all purpose including monetary benefits by considering proposal of the 3rd respondent dated 06.10.2017 within a time to be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr. P.Ganesan For Respon...
P.DEEPAK KUMARAN Vs The Inspector Generla of Registration
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY P.Deepak Kumaran S/o K.E. Palani No 4/194, Iyappan Kovil Street, Kolluthuvanchari Iyyappanthangal Chennai 600 122 ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Inspector General of Registration The office of Inspector General of Registration No 100 Santhome high Court road, Mylapore, Chennai 600 0282. The District Registrar (Administration) Chennai South Integrated building for office of the Commercial Tax and Registration, Department, Fanepet, Nandhanam, Chennai 600 0353. The Joint 1 Sub Registrar South ISaidapet, Chennai 600 015 ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 6 PRAYER: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Second and Third Respondents to remove the encumbrance entries made pursuant to the quashedorder dated 10.10.2023 under the Settlement Deed dated 02.02.2019 registeredas Document No. 1388/ 2019 and to restore th...
CHINNATHAYI Vs The Tahsildar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 29.01.2026CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Chinnathayi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, Mettur Taluk, 2.The Inspector of Police, Nangavalli Police Station, 3.Karupusamy 4.Kuppusamy 5.Gopi 6.Selvakumar 7.Kathamuthu 8.Vijayaraj 9.Nallathambi 10.Perumal 11.Pappa 12.Vignesh 13.Manikandan 14.Murugan 15.Thangam 16.Maariyammal 17.Thailammal ... Respondents Page No.1 of 6Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to survey and point out the field boundaries of the petitioners property comprised in Survey No.503/2A at Kattapatti Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District to an extent of 20.50 Ares by fixing stones along with police aid of the 2nd respondent for survey and also setting up the fencing to the petitioners aforesaid mentioned property in pursuance of the petitioners representation dated 08.12.2025.For Petitioner : Mr...
J.KARTHIK Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR1. J.Karthik S/o.Jeyachandran, D.No.30/37, Sathiyavanimuthu Street, Near Elida Church, Rathinapuri, Coimbatore District. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by The Inspector of Police, AWPS Central Police Station, Coimbatore District. Crime No.56 of 2025 Respondent(s) PRAYER To enlarge the petitioner on Bail in Crime No.56/2025 dated 03.12.2025 on the file of the respondent police and thus render justice. For Intervener: Mr.K.S.Harish For Petitioner(s): M.Vairavan Kasirajan For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 03.12.2025 for the alleged offence punishable under Section 376, 406, 323, 506(i) IPC and section 296(b), 115(2) of BNS in Crime No.56 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner developedrelatio...
P. Ravi vs the Managing Director
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 29.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI P.Ravi ... Petitioner Vs. Chennai-600 002.2. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation,Rep. By Its Administrator, Chennai-600 002. ....Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to settle the interest for the belated payment of retirement benefits such as provident fund, gratuity, and other retirement benefits payable to the petitioner with 12 percentage rate of interest within the time frame that may be stipulated by this Honble Court.For Petitioner : Mr.L.Poovendra Perumal For R1 : Mr.A.Vinothraj For R2 : Mr.C.S.K.SathishORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed directing the Respondents to settle the interest for the belated payment of retirement benefits such as provident fund, gratuity, and other retirement benefits payable to the petitioner with 12 percentage rate of inte...
- ‹ Prev
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- Next ›
- Last »