Chennai Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A.Gullo Girolamo vs D.Senthilkumar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 05.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN A.Gullo Girolamo Rep. By his Power Agent M.Vijay Maheswaran ...Petitioner -Vs- S.Thushara ...Respondent PRAYER: This petition is filed under Section 419 (4) of BNSS, 2023, seeking to grant Special Leave to prosecute the above appeal before this Honble Court against the order of acquittal dated 22.10.2024 made in STC No.696 of 2019 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track) Court, Tiruppur. For Petitioner : Mr.MarisharanORDERThe Appeal challenges the Judgment of acquittal passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track) Court, Tiruppur in S.T.C.No.696 of 2019 vide order dated 22.10.2024.2. It is case of the petitioner that towards the discharge of therespondents liability, the respondent had issued a cheque in favour of the petitioner; that when the cheque was presented for collection, it was returned for the reason payment stopped by drawer and hence, the resp...
A.Gullo Girolamo vs S.Thushara
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 05.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN A.Gullo Girolamo Rep. By his Power Agent M.Vijay Maheswaran ...Petitioner -Vs- S.Thushara ...Respondent PRAYER: This petition is filed under Section 419 (4) of BNSS, 2023, seeking to grant Special Leave to prosecute the above appeal before this Honble Court against the order of acquittal dated 22.10.2024 made in STC No.695 of 2019 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track) Court, Tiruppur. For Petitioner : Mr.MarisharanORDERThe Appeal challenges the Judgment of acquittal passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track) Court, Tiruppur in S.T.C.No.695 of 2019 vide order dated 22.10.2024.2. It is case of the petitioner that towards the discharge of therespondents liability, the respondent had issued a cheque in favour of the petitioner; that when the cheque was presented for collection, it was returned for the reason payment stopped by drawer and hence, the resp...
Srinivasan vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and W.M.P.Nos.14048, 14052 & 14055 of 2025 Srinivasan ... Petitioner Vs.3. Harfunnisha4. A.Hafiz ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the Impugned notice having reference Na.Ka.No.1535/2025/B1 dated 27.03.2025, on the file of the second respondent, quash the same. For Petitioner : Ms.U.Ramya For Respondents For R1 & R2 : Mr.D.Ravichander Special Government Pleader For R3 : Ms.S.R.Subaashiini For Mr.SR.Sundar For R4 : Mr.S.Kumaradevan Page No.1 of 4ORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in this Writ Petition has now become infructuous in view of the order dated 02.12.2025, passed in W.P.No.9278 of 2028. She has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.2. In terms of the endorsement m...
J.Ganesan vs the Government of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
2026:MHC:522IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN W.A.Nos.594 and 622 of 2016, 235, 267, 744 of 2017, W.P.Nos.12525, 17705, 30067 and 30068 of 2016, 12154 and 13035 of 2019 and C.M.P.Nos.8169, 7867 of 2016, 3817, 4164, 4165, 10264 of 2017, 23493 of 2018, 2825 of 2019, W.M.P.Nos.10839, 15407, 26053, 26054 of 2016 and 13166 of 2019 W.A.No.594 of 20161. J.Ganesan2. K.Gowrisankar3. R.Manikandan4. M.Premkumar5. G.Thameem Khan6. M.Abishek7. M.Santhosh8. S.Surendran9. N.Sakthivel10. Balamurugan ... Petitioners/Appellants -vs-1. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Labour and Employment (T2) Fort St.George, Madras-600 009.2. The Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Rep. by the Chief Engineer (Personnel), NPKKRR Maligai, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai-2 ... Respondents/RespondentsPrayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set asid...
The Secretary to Government vs Tmt. M. Rajakumari
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
2026:MHC:95IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN AND CMP No.19993 OF 20161. The Secretary To Government School Education (OP) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 9. 2.The Secretary To Government Personnel And Administrative Reforms Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 9. Appellant(s) Vs1. Tmt. M. Rajakumari W/o. M. Karunakaran, Plot No. 32, New No. 25, 3rd Cross St, Lakshmi Nagar, Nanganallur, Chennai 61. Respondent(s)PRAYER Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, praying to set aside the Order of the Honble High Court of Madras dated 31/08/2012 made in W.P. No. 19367/2012. For Appellant(s): Mr.K.H.Ravi Kumar, Government Advocate For Respondent(s): No AppearanceJUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Notice served to the respondent and the name of the respondent is printed in the High Court Cause List despite, none appears. Therefore this ...
Anushya Vs Mayakrishnan Ponnusamy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2026
C.M.P.No.41 of 2026 in C.R.P.SR.No.46 of 2026P.B.BALAJI, J.Dispensed with for the present.2. Post this matter on 05.01.2026 under the caption For admission. 02.01.2026 Jd Note: Registry is directed to number the civil revision petition, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Anushya Vs Mayakrishnan Ponnusamy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2026
C.M.P.No.42 of 2026 in C.R.P.SR.No.46 of 2026P.B.BALAJI, J.Dispensed with for the present.2. Post this matter on 05.01.2026 under the caption For admission. 02.01.2026 Jd Note: Registry is directed to number the civil revision petition, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
B.Kanniammal vs V.Bakthavatsalam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL B.Kanniammal Appellant(s) Vs V.Bakthavatsalam Respondent(s) PRAYER This Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 to set aside the order decree passed in FCOP.No.3832 of 2018 dated 22.10.2019 on the file of the V Additional Family Court, Chennai. For Petitioner Ms. R.V.Rukmani, for Mr.P.B.RamanujamORDER(Order of the Court was made by N.Sathish Kumar J.)The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed challenging the orderpassed by the Trial Court dismissing the application filled for divorce. 1 of 42. The appellant is the wife of the respondent. She sought dissolution ofmarriage at the age of 75 years. Though it appears that both husband and wife were residing in the same house, disputes arose between them with regard to sharing of their property, which resulted in filing of the application for divorce....
M/s.Arthi And Co Vs The Superintending Engineer / National highways,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED :02.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA M/s.Arthi and Co., Represented by its Partner Mr.K.Manikandan, Registered Contractor, No.16/21, State Bank Colony, Mahalingapuram, Pollachi, Coimbatore - 642 002 ... Petitioner Vs. Coimbatore 641 018 ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider the request of the petitioner dated 23.12.2025 and 31.12.2025 and thereby directing the 2nd respondent to fix an another time slot for site inspection and to issue the Work Site Inspection Certificate and working condition of the Plant and Machineries Certificates on or before 02.01.2026 upto 17.45 hrs so as to enable the petitioner to participate in the E-tender process in accordance with law within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Ilamurugu For Respondents 1 and 2 : Mr.V.Jeevagiridharan Additional Gove...
M/S Modern Enginnering vs Customs Excise and Service
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2026
2026:MHC:60IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL and M.P.No.1 of 2009 M/s Modern Engineering & Plastics Pvt Ltd., A/2, SIDCO Industrial Estate, Mettur Dam 636 403, Salem District. ..Appellant(s) Vs1. Customs, Excise And Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Shastri Bhavan Annexe, 1st Floor, 26, Haddows Road, Chennai- 600 006.2. Commissioner Of Customs And Central Excise (Appeals), No.1, Williams Road, Cantonment, Tiruchirapalli.3. Joint Commisisoner of Central Excise,18. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944 against the final Order No.E/575/2009 dated 18.05.2009 on the file of Honble Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai.For Appellant(s): Mr.S.Murugappan For Respondent(s): R1 - Tribunal Ms.Revathi Manivannan Senior Standing Counsel (for R2 and R3)Judgment(Judgment of the Court was delivered by ...
- ‹ Prev
- 350
- 351
- 352
- 353
- 354
- 356
- 357
- 358
- 359
- 360
- Next ›
- Last »