Chennai Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
E.Manogaran vs S.R.Nagendiran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 05.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR . JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL & C.M.P.No.5581 of 2020 & 12215 of 20251. Mr.E.Manogaran2. Tmt.L.Nandini ... AppellantsVersusMr.S.R.Nagendiran ... Respondent First Appeal filed under Order 41 of Rule 1 of CPC read with Section 96 against the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.235 of 2014 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, Thiruvallur District dated 06.09.2019. For Petitioner : Ms.P.Dharseni and Mr.N.Elayaraja For Respondent : Mr.V.M.VenkataramanaJUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) When the matter was listed on 02.01.2026, there was no representation for the appellants. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption "For Dismissal".2. Today, Ms.P.Dharseni, learned counsel for appellants is before this Court, but she is not ready to argue the matter and seeks for an adjournment citing diffic...
Irshath Azad vs Naadhiya Begum
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 05.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR and C.M.P.Nos.7105 and 7107 of 2024 1.Irshath Azad 2.Abdul Kalam Azad 3.Nigar Sulthana 4.Imran Azad 5.Farzana 6.Irfhan Asad 7.Reshma 8.Abdul Munaf ... Petitioners vs. Naadhiya Begum ... Respondent PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to strike-out the petition in D.V.C.No.154 of 2023 pending on the file of Court of Judicial Magistrate-II, Puducherry and allow the Civil Revision Petition. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar for M/s.C.Jayavel For Respondent : Mr.D.AshokkumarORDERThe Civil Revision Petition is filed seeking to strike off the complaint preferred by the respondent under the provisions of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 in D.V.C.No.154 of 2023 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate-II, Puducherry.2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submitthat the complaint was preferred by the resp...
Mamtha Srawankumar vs C.Ponnuswamy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Mamtha Srawankumar W/o.Srawankumar Petitioning Creditor vs. C.Ponnuswamy Debtor Petition filed under Sections 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 of the Presidency-Towns Insolvency Act, III of 1909 and Order III-A of the Insolvency Rules, 1958, praying (a) to adjudicate the Debtor as Insolvent;(b) to direct that the estate of the Debtor be vested in the OfficialAssignee of Madras, for the benefit of the General body of creditors of the Debtor; and (c) to order that the costs of this petition paid by the Official Assignee of Madras, from and out of the estate of the Debtor to the Petitioning Creditor. For Petitioning Creditor : Mr.T.Srikanth *****ORDERLearned counsel for petitioning creditor seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect.N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.gm Recording the said endorsement, the Insolvency Petition is dismissed a...
B.Pragadeesh vs R.Kandaswamy Gounder
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE and C.M.P.Nos.10648 of 2018 & 14633 of 2019 B.Pragadeesh ... Appellant Vs 1.R.Kandaswamy Gounder 2.K.Baladhandapani 3.B.Renugadevi ... Respondents PRAYER: This Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of C.P.C., against the fair and decreetal dated 12.12.2017 in I.A.No.114 of 2017 in O.S.No.77 of 2016 on the file of the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge Court, For Appellant : Mr.C.R.Prasanan For R1 & R2 : Mr.S.ThangavelJUDGMENTWhen the matter came up for hearing on 19.12.2025, the learned counsel for the appellant reported no instructions from his client and sought permission to file a memo to that effect. Accordingly, the Registry was directed to print the name of the appellant in the cause list.2. Today, i.e., on 05.01.2026, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the name of the appellant was printed in the cause list; however, none appeared on behalf of th...
S.Shanmugam vs a.Nathiya
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 05.01.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CMSA.No.5 of 2025 and CMP.No.4928 of 2025 S.Shanmugam S/o.K.Sundaram ... Appellant Vs A.Nathiya W/o.S.Shanmugam ... Respondent PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed Under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the Judgment and decree dated 22.11.2024 passed in CMA.No.1 of 2023, on the file of the II AdditionalDistrict Judge, Tiruchengode, confirming the decree and the judgementdated 26.10.2022 rendered in HMOP.No.151 of 2014, on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode, by allowing this Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal. For Appellant : M/s.G.Sumitra For Respondent : Mr.PalanisamyJUDGEMENTThe appellants have filed this Second Appeal against the judgmentand decree dated 22.11.2024 passed in CMA.No.1 of 2023, on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Tiruchengode, confirming the decree and thejudgement dated 26.10.2022 rendered in HMOP.No.151 ...
MUNUSAMY Vs Pazhani
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 619 days in representing the above second appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, and perused the materials available in the record.3. On being satisfied with the averments stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the delay is condoned.4. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous petition is allowed.5. The Registry is directed to list the above Second Appeal after numbering the same, if it is otherwise in order. pvs pvs...
MEENAKSHISUNDARAM Vs The District Revenue Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and W.M.P.No.7590 of 2020 Meenakshisundaram ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, Chennai Division, Chennai 1.2. The Tahsildar, Maduravoyal, Chennai 95.3. Dr.Sangeetha ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records on the file of the first respondent in proceedings NA.KA.24893/2018/J14 dated 11.11.2019 and quash the proceedings as illegal, incompetent and without jurisdiction. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Karthik For Respondents For R1 & R2 : Mr.C.Jayaprakash Government Advocate For R3 : No appearancePage No.1 of 6ORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned notice/summon dated 11.11.2019 issued by the first respondent.2. By the impugned notice/summon, the petitioner has been calledupon to appear for hearing on 19.11.20219 before the first responden...
E.VELAN Vs The District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN WP Nos. 28466 of 2021 & 454 of 2022 AND WMP Nos. 30059, 30061 of 2021, 502 & 504 of 20221. E.Velan S/o. M. Ethiraj, No. 31, Murugan Koil Street, Iyyappa Nagar, Ayapakkam, Chennai - 77.2. A. K. M. Rahamathullah S/o. Mohammed Abdul Kadhar, No. 39, Ayappakkam Main Road,3. M. Selvakumar S/o. Muthusamy, No. 7, Ayappakkam Main Road,4. G. Ramasami S/o. Gurusamy, No. 18, Ayappakkam Main Road,5. N. Raja S/o. Narayanan, No. 10, Ayappakkam Main Road,6. K. Banumathi W/o. Late. C. Kasinathan, No. 14/20, Ayappakkam Main Road, MGR Puram, Athipattu Village, Chennai - 58.7. Sivalingam S/o. Chinnasami, No. 4/7, Ayappakkam Main Road,8. Yuvaraj S/o. A. Vedhanayagam, No. 6, Ayappakkam Main Road,9. R. Murugan S/o. E. Ramasamy, No. 14, MGR Puram, Chennai - 58.10. E. Ravamani W/o. Elumalai, No. 21, Ayappakkam Main Road,11. H. Murugan S/o. Hariram, No. 5,...
E.R.Squibb and Sons LLC Vs Union of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON 17.10.2025PRONOUNCED ON 05.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR W.P. No.8451 of 2023 and W.M.P. Nos.8647, 8649 & 8650 of 2023 1.E.R.Squibb & Sons LLC at Route 206 & Province Line Road Princeton, New Jersey 08540 Represented by its Constituted Attorney/Authorised Signatory Mr.Toni Mon George 2.Ono Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd. at 1-5, Doshomachi 2-chome Chuo-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka 541-8526 Japan Represented by its Constituted Attorney/Authorised Signatory Mr.Toni Mon George .. Petitioners Vs. 1.Union of India Through the Ministry of Commerce Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion Udyog Bhawan New Delhi 110 011 2.The Controller of Patents & Designs The Patent Office Page 1/29 Intellectual Property Office Building G.S.T. Road, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032 3.Zydus Healthcare Limited of Zydus Corporate Park Scheme No.63, Survey No.536 Khoraj (Gandhinagar), Nr.Vaishnodevi Circle Ahmedabad, Gujarat...
Pratish Vedhapuddi vs Jayesh N. Parekh
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH in I.N.No.43 of 2024 1.Pratish Vedhapuddi 2.V.Divya Pratish Applicants/Debtors vs. Jayesh N. Parekh Respondent/ Petitioning Creditor Application filed under Order II Rule 1 of Insolvency Rules read with Section 9(5) of the Presidency-Towns Insolvency Act, III of 1909, praying to set aside the Insolvency Notice issued in I.N.No.43 of 2024. For Applicants : Mr.S.Saravanakumar For Respondent : Mr.T.Shrinikethan *****ORDERThis application has been filed challenging the Insolvency Notice issued in I.N.No.43 of 2024.2. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the orderpassed by this Court in C.R.P.Nos.4218 of 2024 etc. batch datedN.ANAND VENKATESH, J.gm 21.11.2025 was placed before this Court. Insofar as this application is concerned, C.R.P.Nos.1303,1305 and 1306 of 2025 will be relevant. The Civil Revision Petitions were allowed by imposing conditions and the relevant portion ...
- ‹ Prev
- 347
- 348
- 349
- 350
- 351
- 353
- 354
- 355
- 356
- 357
- Next ›
- Last »