Chennai Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/s.Angel One Limited, previously known as Angel Broking P Ltd., Vs S. ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
In the High Court of Judicature at MadrasReserved on Delivered on: 21.1.2026 27.1.2026Coram :The Honourable Mr.Justice N.ANAND VENKATESH Arbitration O.P.(Com.Div.) No.417 of 2023 M/s.Angel One Limited, previously known as Angel Broking P.Ltd., 5th & 6th Floors, Akruti Star, Central Road, MIDC, Andheri East, Mumbai, Maharashtra-400093 rep.by Senior Manager, Legal & Compliance ...Petitioner Vs Mr.S.X.J.Vasan, No.11, Ayyavu Street, Ayyavu Colony, Aminjikarai, Chennai-29. ...Respondent PETITION under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 praying to set aside the award of the sole Arbitrator Mr.K.Harishankar in Arb.No.3/2021 dated 10.6.2023 and to direct the respondent to pay the costs. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Surya Narayanan & Mrs.Jayasudha Surya Narayanan For Respondent : Mr.B.Arvind SrevatsaORDERThe petitioner assails the award passed by the sole Arbitrator dated 10.6.2023 by filing this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ...
J. Harish Vs K. Rajeswari (Died) 1. Central Bank of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
C.M.P.No.23132 of 2025 in A.S.SR.No.113678 of 2025P.B.BALAJI, J.This petition is filed seeking condonation of delay of 10 days in filing the appeal.2. The learned counsel for the 1strespondent has no serious objection for condoning the delay. Despite service of notice, the respondents 2 and 3 have neither appeared in person nor through counsel.3. I have gone through the affidavit filed and I am satisfied with the reasons assigned. Hence, the delay is condoned and C.M.P.No.23132 of 2025 is ordered. 27.01.2026 Jeni Note: Registry is directed to number and list the appeal for admission before the Joint Registrar, Appellate Side, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
New India Assurance Company Limited Vs Gopalakrishnan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 556 days in preferring the above second appeal. 2.Mr.J.Pradeep, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent did not raise any objection in allowing this petition. This Court is satisfied with the reasons attributed in the affidavit filed in support of this petition. Hence, this petition is ordered.3. The Registry is directed to number C.M.A.Sr.No.113942 of 2024, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same in the usual course.4. It is made clear that the petitioner will not be entitled for any interest for the default period, if in the event of this Court enhancing the amount of compensation fixed by the Tribunal. vsn vsn...
P.Anandhi and 3 others Vs No Respondent
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL1. P.Anandhi W/o. Prakash Babu, D/o. M.Thejram,2. T.Madhan Mohan s/o. M.Thejram,3. U.Padmini W/o. Ujjal E Singh D/o. M.Thejram,4. T.Yuvaraj S/o. M.Thejram.....Petitioner(s) Vs No Respondent Nil ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The Original Petition has been filed under 232, 255 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act read with Order XXV Rule 5 of the Original Side Rules praying that letters of Administration with Schedule-1 of the annexed Will dated 26.11.1967 may be granted to the petitioners as beneficiaries under the will of deceased limited to the assets mentioned in the affidavit of assets and to have effect limited to the state of Tamil Nadu. Page1 of 8For Petitioner(s): M/s R.K. Sekina ReshmaORDERThis petition has been filed under Section 232, 255 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act to grant Letters of Administration to the petitioners to the estates and credits of the deceased having effe...
Sumathi Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.20718 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.No.14849 of 2025 1.Sumathi 2.Subash 3.Thirunavukarasu ... Petitioners / A1 to A3 Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Perambalur Police Station, Perambalur District. ... Respondent (Crime No.274 of 2025) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in event of arrest pending investigation in Crime No.274 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners : Mr.V.Ramanareddy For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For Intervenor : Mr.Pa.P.ThangavelORDERThe petitioners apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b), 61(2) (b), 351(2) 336(3), 79 & 318(4) of BNS Act in Crime No.274 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail.2. The allegation again...
Murugesan vs the State Rep by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN Murugesan S/o.Sundaram No.82, M.V.K. Nagar, 5th Street, Perambalur. Appellant(s)/accused Vs State represented by The Inspector of Police, Puduchatram Police Station, Namakkal District. Crime No.1186 of 2010 Respondent(s)/Complainant Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. against thejudgment dated 06.07.2019 passed in S.C.No.2 of 2016 on the file of thePrincipal Sessions Court, Namakkal and to set aside the same. For Appellant(s): Mr.S.V.Karthikeyan For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Damodaran Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Ms.Arifa ThasneemJUDGMENT(delivered by M.Jothiraman, J.) Challenging the judgment dated 06.07.2019 passed in S.C.No.2 of 2016 on the file of the Principal Sessions Court, Namakkal, the appellant has preferred the above appeal.2. The brief case of the prosecution is as follows:2.1 PW1 Sridharan, Village Administ...
SAROJINI (DIED) 1. K.Sridhar Vs Sellappillai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA CMP Nos. 31996, 31999 and 32002 of 2025 in SAROJINI (DIED) 1. K.Sridhar S/O Late Kandasamy Muthunagar Kasba, Perambalur, Now at D.No.12, Near Sungate Arch, Thanthondrimalai Road, Karur 639 005 Appellant(s) Vs Sellappillai S/O Perumal Moopan, Avvaiyar Street, 14th Ward, Thuraimangalam Perambalur Taluk And Dist and 17 Others Respondent(s)ORDERThese applications have been filed i) to condone the delay of 280 days in filing this application in S.A.No.1045 of 2010 insofar as the respondent (deceased) Mohammed Imrankhan is concerned; ii) to set aside the abatement caused in the above second appeal due to the death of respondent (Deceased) Mohammed Imrankhan; iii) and to bring on record the proposed respondents herein as Lrs of the deceased respondent Viz., Mohammed Imrankhan as respondents 15 to 18 in the above second appeal.2. Heard both sides.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in th...
The Commissioner vs Senthilkumar Subbaiyan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WMP Nos. 32850 of 2025 The Commissioner Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious And Charitable Endowment, Nungambakkam Chennai 34 AND 2 OTHERS Vs S/o Subbaiyan Kalpachapalli, Molasi Namakkal Tamilnadu 637 210 AND 4 OTHERS WMP No. 17720 of 2024 Vs The Principal Secretary To Government Government Of Tamilnadu Department Of Tourism, Culture And Religious Endowment Chenani 600 009 AND 6 OTHERS The Hon'ble Chief Justice andG.Arul Murugan, J.For Petitioner(s): Mr. N.R.R.Arun Natarajan Special Government Pleader For Respondent(s):Ms. E.N.Rajalakshmi For Mr.T.S.Vijaya Raghavan, For R1. Mr. A.Edwin Prabakar State Govt Pleader, Assisted By Mr.M.Habeeb Rahman, Govt. Advocate, For R2 And R3.ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Th interim order granted on 21.06.2024, stood vacated by theorder of this Court on...
Kuzhanthai Velu Raghothaman vs the Chairman
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and WMP.No.27336 of 2023 Kuzhanthai Velu Raghothaman Ullagaram, Chennai 91 ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Chairman Central Board Of Direct Taxes, Department Of Revenue, Ministry Of Finance, North Block, Secretariat Building, New Delhi 110 0012. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii No. 121 Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 34.3. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax Range 19, No. 121 Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 34.4. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income TaxNon Corporate Circle 19 (1), No. 121 Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 34. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, forissuance of a Writ of Certiorari for records pertaining to the impugned orderPage1 of 10 dated 19.06.2023 vide F.No. 225/48/ 2023- ITA- II on the file of the first respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): M.Sathyakumar Fo...
R.Ramesh vs the Management
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY R.Ramesh No.19, 9th Cross Street, Abdul Kalam Nagar, Senneerkuppam, Poonamallee, Chennai-600 056. Petitioner Vs The Management Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Ltd., Pallavaram Illam , Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. Respondent PRAYER Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of II Additional Labour Court, Chennai order dated 27.02.2025 passed in C.P. No.66 of 2022, quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to pay the backwages with other attendant benefits for the non-employment period as claimed in C.P. No.66 of 2022.For Petitioner Mr. S.T. Varadarajulu For Respondent Mr. A. VinothrajORDERThe writ petition is filed challenging the award of the II Additional Labour Court, Chennai, dated 27.02.2025, made in C.P.No.66 of 2022. By the said award, th...
- ‹ Prev
- 337
- 338
- 339
- 340
- 341
- 343
- 344
- 345
- 346
- 347
- Next ›
- Last »