Chennai Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
C.Manoj Tak Vs State of Tamilnadu rep.by, Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 29.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.655 of 2026 C.Manoj Tak ... Petitioner Vs. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, T-14, Pallikaranai, Traffic Investigation Wing, Chennai. ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Cr.No.583 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Gowtham, Senior Advocate, for Mr.B.Pachaiyappan For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 281, 125(b) and 106(1) of BNS @ 281 and 105 of BNS r/w Section 196 of Motor Vehicles Act, in Cr.No.583 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The allegation against the petitioner is that he drove the twowheeler in a rash and negligent manner in the public ...
RAJA @ RAJAEKARAN Vs State rep.by The Inspector of police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 29.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Raja @ Rajasekaran ... Petitioner/Accused Vs. The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police ( Crime) Crime No.307 of 2024 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.307 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners : Mr.D.Ilayaraja For Respondent : M/s.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Criminal Side)ORDERThe petitioner herein apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 4(1-A)4(1)(b), 4(1)(g),4(1)(h) read with Section 7 and 11 of TN Rectified Spirit Rules and Section 468, 471 and 420 of IPC in Crime No.307 of 2024, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned GovernmentAdvocate (Crl. Sid...
N.Vimala Vs State through The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.1354 of 2026N.Vimala W/o.Nagaraj ... Petitioner Vs The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, T-15, Kannagi Nagar Police Station, Kannagi Nagar, Chennai. (Crime No.267 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest by the respondent in Crime No.267 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr. V.BaskerFor Respondent : M/s. J.R. Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ******ORDERThe petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) and 351(3), 61(2) of BNS Act, 2023, r/w Section 4 of TN Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, in Crime No.267 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. ...
Bharathi Vs the Principal Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Bharathi, W/o.Kannan, No.30, Karai Kattu Chockalingam Street, Chidambaram, Cuddalore District-608 001. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Principal Secretary to Government Health and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.2. The Director of Medical Education and Research Directorate of Medical Education and research, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 0103. The Vice Chancellor Annamalai Unviersity, Cuddalore Dsitrict-608 002.4. The Registrar Annamalai University Annamalai Nagar, Chindambaram, Cuddalore District-608 002 Page1 of 75. The Dean Government Medical College and Hospital Cuddalore District-608 001.6. The Principal Government College of Nursing Annamalai Nagar, Chidambaram, Cuddalore District-608 002. ..Respondent(s)Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking Writ of Mandamus, directing the1st and 2nd respondents to absorb the petitioner into Tamil...
N.Palanisamy Vs The Divisional Engineer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN IN WP NO. 28496 OF 2018 N.Palanisamy S/o.Late Nachimuthu Gounder, No. 2, White Field, Tiruppur Illam Back Side, Avinashi Road, Tiruppur 641 603 ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Divisional Engineer Highways Department, 1371A/ 1, Highways Colony, Gopalapuram, CoimbatoreCoimbatore2. The Commissioner of Police,3. The Commissioner, Corporation of Tiruppur, Kumaran Road,4. G.Vijiya W/o.Govindaraj, 6/8, Thiruneelagandar Street,5. G.Vigneshvaran Page1 of 8 S/o.Govindharaj, 6/8, Thiruneelgandar Street,6. V.Susila W/o.Vadival, 55, Nethaji Street, 15,7. B.Mahalakshmi W/o.Babu, 131, Bavendar Bharathidasan Nagar, Pillayar Koil Street, Gandhi Nagar, Tiruppur-641 603.8. S.Neelammal W/o.Shanmugam, 3/128, Barathi Nagar, Tiruppur-641 602.9. G.Karthikeyan , S/o.Govindharaj, 6/80, Thiruneelagandar10. M.Anitha W/o.Mariyappan, 6/80, Thiruneelagandar11. R.Aithammal...
V.Govindan vs the State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE AND WMP NO. 2460 OF 2025V.Govindan, S/o.Varadan, Residing At No 12/97, Periya Mathur, Pelakkadu Post Maramangalam, Salem District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The State Of Tamil Nadu, Rep, by the Secretary to Government, Environment And Forest Department, Fort St George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The District Collector, Salem District, Salem. 3.The Forest Officer, Yercaud Salem. 4.The District Forest Officer, Gandhi Road, Salem 636 007. 5.The District Revenue Officer, Cum District Level Committee, Salem Collectorate Office, Salem. 6.The Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare, Salem, Salem District. 7.The Tahsildar, Yercaud, Salem District. Respondent(s)PRAYER:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 7th respondent to implement the order passed by the 6th respondent made in Na.Ka. No. 295 / 2023 / A dated 04.12.20...
SAK Impex Shipping Services Vs Deputy State Tax Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANANAND WMP NO. 3230 OF 2026,WMP NO. 3231 OF 2026 SAK Impex Shipping Services Represented By its Partner Mr.Anandkumar Singh No. 621, New no 123, 4th Floor, Sire Mansion, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 006 ..Petitioner(s) Vs Deputy State Tax Officer Annasalai Assessment Circle, No.1, Greams Road, Annex Building, 4th Floor, Chennai-600 006 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Art.226 of Constitution of India seeking for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the impugned order of the Respondent passed in GSTN No. 33ADTFS2632J1ZR/2019-20 dated 23.07.2024 and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Ms.Divya A For Respondent(s): Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, Government AdvocatePage1 of 5ORDERMrs.K.Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent.2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petit...
Sundaramurthy vs Union of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P.No.1459 of 20261. Sundaramurthy S/o.late.Duraisamy, No.36, Marimamman Koil Street, Karasur, Pondicherry-605 502.2. GunasundariD/o.late.Duraisamy, No.8, Third Cross street, New colony sedarapet, Pondicherry-605 111 Rep.by her Power Agent Sundaramurthy (1st Petitioner), S/o.Late.Duraisamy3. Ambiga w/o.Late.Sugumaran, Pondicherry-605 502 Rep. by their Power Agent Anbarasan (5th Petitioner) S/o.Late.Sugumaran Page1 of 64. Kalaivani d/o.late.Sugumaran, Pondicherry-605 502 Rep. by their Power Agent Anbarasan (5th Petitioner) S/o.Late.Sugumaran5. Anbarasan S/o.late.Sugumaran, Pondicherry-605 502. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Union Of India Rep. by the Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Government of Ponducherry, Puducherry-605 001.2. The district collector (Revenue) I-Floor, New Revenue Complex, Vazhudavoor Road, Pettaiyanchathiram, Puducherry-605 009.3. The Deputy c...
Mrs.Nishanthini Vs THE SUB REGISTRAR
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY Nishanthini .. Petitioner vs Namakkal District. .. Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the impugned refusal check slip under Refusal No.RFL/PUDHUCHATRAM_NAMAKKAL/BOOK2/1 dated 05.01.2026 and to quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondent to entertain the sale deed. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Karthikeyan for Mr.K.Manikandan For Respondent : Mr.U.Baranidharan, Special Government PleaderORDERThe petitioner executed and presented a sale deed for registration. The request for registration was declined under the impugned order by invoking Section 22A(2) of the Registration Act, 1908.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the originalintention was to form a lay out after obtaining approval. In relation thereto, he submits that a gift deed was e...
Mr. Rajendiran Vs District commissioner of Survey and Settlement,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Mr. Rajendiran ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. District commissioner of Survey andSettlement, Commissioner of Survey and Land revenue office, Cuddalore District. Cuddalore District.607 001. ..Respondent(s) Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the 3rd and 4th respondents herein to conduct survey and fix the boundary stones for petitioners property, comprised in Survey No.120 /6 Patta No.782 in 0.23.50 Hectare Ares within the boundaries of Maligaimedu Village, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District by considering the petitioners representation dated For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Krishnakumar For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander, SGP Page1 of 4ORDERThis writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 3 and 4 to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, wit...
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »