Chennai Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State of Tamil Nadu Vs S.K.Uma
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.01.2026CoramTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL and C.M.P.No.33005 of 2025 1.State of Tamil Nadu, represented by Secretary to Government, Social Welfare and Noon Meal Programme, (NM4-2) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 9. 2.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Finance (Pay) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 9. 3.The Director of Social Welfare and Noon Meal Programme, II Floor, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai 15. 4.The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. ... Appellants Vs. S.K.Uma W/o.S.V.Ravi ... RespondentWrit Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the orderdated 25.03.2024 made in W.P.No.20813 of 2022 passed by this Court. For Appellants : Mr.M.Suresh Kumar Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.S.Yashwanth, Additional Government Pleader For Respondents : Mr.K.Venkataramani, Senior Counsel for Mr.M.Muthappan *****JUDGMENT[M...
Tamil Nadu Tharavu Ulleetalargal Sangam Vs The Government of Tamil Nad ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and WMP No.13353 of 2022 Tamil Nadu Tharavu Ulleetalargal Sangam, (Tamil Nadu Data Entry Operators Union), Rep by its President, No.13/27, Mosque Street, Chepauk, Chennai- 600 005. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Labour and Employment Department, Fort St.George, Chennai- 600 009.2. The Commissioner of Labour,3. The Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation), Head Quarters, Office of the Commissioner of Labour,4. Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director, 6th Floor, Dugar Towers, Marshall Road, Egmore,5. The General Manager Operations, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited, 6th Floor, Dugar Towers, Marshall Road, Egmore, ..Respondents Page1 of 5Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for an issuance of writ of mandamus, (i) directing the 2 nd...
M.Umar vs Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP No. 11870 of 2025 and WMP.Nos.13434 and 13435 of 2025 M.Umar ..Petitioner Vs1. Government Of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Secretary to Govt. Department Of Municipal Administration & Water Supply, Fort St. George, Chennai 600009.2. The Commissioner, Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation, Coimbatore.3. The Assistant Commissioner, Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation, Central Zone, Coimbatore. ..Respondents Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for a Writof Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to (i) the Orderbearing Na.Ka.No.10354/2023/A2(M) dt. 18.03.2025 on the file of the 2nd Respondent, (ii) the Order bearing Na.Ka.No. 10354/2023/A2(M) dt.24.02.2024 on the file of the 3rd respondent and (iii) the Tender Notification bearing Na.Ka.No.10354/2023/A2(M) dt.20.01.2025 on the file of the 2nd respondent Page1 of 12and quash the same...
Jayanthi Kannappan and 4 Others vs G.V.Kamalammal (Deceased) and 6 Oth ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL1. Jayanthi Kannappan2. Lavanya3. Yamini4. Ishwarya5. Sathappa Srinivasan ..Applicants(s) Vs V.Kamalammal (Deceased)1. Dr.G.V.Varadarajulu @ Sekar2. Dharmaraya Pillai Thanner Pandal Inam Trust rep. By J.Dinakaran 21, Thandavarayan Street, East Gopalapuram, Royapettah, Chenani 143. C.K.Jayaraman4. G.V.Geetha5. K.M.Ananatha Krishnan6. Dipta Balaji7. Rohit Krishnam ..Respondents Page1 of 3 For Applicants : Mr.Anandan For Respondents: Mr.K.Ravi, Sr.Counsel for M/s J.Srinivasan for M/s Ragan & AryaORDERThis application has been filed to permit the applicants to recall the witness on the side of the applicants.2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents would submit thatno witnesses have been examined on the side of the applicants, therefore, filing of the present application to recall the witness may not arise and the present application is not maintainable.3. Heard the learne...
Kandasamy, S/O.Govinda Reddiar vs the State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN and WMP No. 16477 of 2024 Kandasamy ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The State Of TamilNaduRep. By Secretary To Govt., Department Of Cooperation, Food And Consumer Protection, Office Of Collectorate, Tiruvallur Zone, Tiruvallur Dist. Tiruvallur District Consumer Wholesale Marketing Society, Tiruvallur. ..Respondent(s)Prayer : This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to call for the impugned records relating to Na.Ka.No. 288/2016/A3 dated 02.02.2024 on the file of Second Respondent and quash the said proceedings in respect of petitioner and forbearing the second respondent from partially implementing the unreasonable restriction imposed on the petitioner hold Page1 of 4disqualified forever from becoming the Executive Committee Member in any Society registered under Section 36(1) of TamilNadu Cooperative Societies Act 1983. For Petitioner(s): Mr.J.R.K.Bha...
Peter John vs Daisy Fore Axeeliam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL CMA No. 1736 of 2023 and CMP.No.17066 of 2023 Peter John Appellant(s) Vs Daisy Fore Axeeliam Respondent(s) PRAYER: Appeal filed under Section 19 of Family Courts Act, 1984 to set aside the order dated 13.10.2021 passed in IA.No. 273 of 2021 in DOP.No. 67 of 2020 on the file Family Court, Villupuram. For Appellant(s): Mr.C.Prabakaran For Respondent(s): Ms.C.N.Prarthana for Ms.T.Krithika DeviORDER(Order of the Court was made by N.Sathish Kumar J.) This appeal has been filed challenging the order of the learned Judge, Family Court, Villupuram directing the appellant to pay a sum of Rs.20,0090/- as interim maintenance to the respondent wife herein.2. Counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that despite the communication sent by registered post, appellant is not cooperating for appeal. Copy of the notice sent to the appellant is also annex...
R. Achuthan Vs S. Jagadeshwari
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE TR CMP No. 417 of 2025 and CMP No.9613 of 2025 R.Achuthan ...Petitioner(s) Vs. Mrs.S.Jagadeshwari ...Respondent(s) Prayer in Tr.CMP No.417 of 2025: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of Code of Civil Procedure, pleased to withdraw the H.M.O.P.No.621 of 2024 on the file of the Sub Court, Poonamallee and transfer the same to the Family Court, Cuddalore.Prayer in CMP No.9613 of 2025: Petition filed under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, pleased to stay all further proceedings in H.M.O.P.No.621 of 2024 on the file of the Sub Court, Poonamallee pending disposal of the above Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.S.Poovendhan. For Respondent(s) : Mr.RR.Mohanaraja.ORDERHeard.2. The petitioner/husband has filed the present Transfer Civil MiscellaneousPetition under Section 24 CPC seeking withdrawal of H.M.O.P. No.621 of 2024 pending...
B. Vivekanandan vs the Secretary to the Government of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.Nos.17991 & 17992 of 2025 & 882 of 2026 B. Vivekanandan ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments Department, Secretariat, Chennai-09.2. The Managing Director, Tamilnadu Tourism Complex, Arangam),3. The General Manager, Tamil Nadu Tourism Complex, Arangam)4. S.Karthick5. R.Khadar Hussain6. A.Edith Asha ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 8Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in respect of the impugned orders/Memo:0737/A2/2023 dated 23.08.2024, rejecting to include the petitioners name in the panel for promotion to the post of Assistant for the year 2024 issued by the 3rd respondent and declaring the probation of the petitioner issued in proceedings No.3126/A2/2024 dated 30.08.2024 issued by...
Sp.Meyyappan vs the Chairman Cum Managing Director
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI SP.Meyyappan Assistant (ADM) ADM 5, Tuticorin Thermal Power Station, Tuticorin- 628 004. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Chairman Cum Managing Respondent(s)PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the fourth respondent in Memo No.24729 /Sr.Ado / Adm- III (2) / F. Court Case / 2023 (pertaining to the Appeal dated 23.03.2015 and 31.03.2023 submitted tothe 1st respondent against the order of the 4th respondent) and quash the orderdated 30.12.2023 and consequently direct the 1st respondent to regularize the service of the petitioner taking into the service period for all purpose from 01.05.1999 as on duty with continuity of service and also to grant promotion, with monetary benefits, arrears of salary, interest, pension benefits, gratuity, DCRG, and sanction of earn leave, medical lea...
A.K.Perumal Vs The Director
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR and W.M.P.No.16066 of 2021 A.K.Perumal ... Petitioner vs Kancheepuram. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the second respondents proceedings made in K:/K/vz;/196/br/kh/njh/m/2021 njjp two days salary of the petitioner forthwith and pass orders. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Deepan for Mr.M.Muthappan For Respondents : Mr.T.Chandrasekaran Special Government PleaderORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration and thus, the writ petition has become infructuous.2. In view of the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is closed as infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.Speaking order / ...
- ‹ Prev
- 331
- 332
- 333
- 334
- 335
- 337
- 338
- 339
- 340
- 341
- Next ›
- Last »