Chennai Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Commissioner of Income vs M/S.. Shriram Properties
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
2026:MHC:314IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.01.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR The Commissioner of Income tax, .. Appellant vs M/s.Shriram Properties and Constructions (Chennai) Ltd Greams Dugar, 149, Greams Road, Chennai 600 006 .. RespondentPrayer: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras C Bench, Chennai dated 30.06.2011 in I.T.A.No.1044/Mds/2008 for the assessment year 2003-04. For Appellant : Mr.J.Narayanaswamy Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent : Mr.R.SivaramanDR. ANITA SUMANTH,J.andMUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR,J.JUDGMENT(Delivered by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH.,J) Mr.J.Narayanaswamy, learned Senior Standing Counsel, appearing for the appellant / Department would submit that the Income-Tax Department does not wish to pursue this appeal qua assessment year 2003-04 and seeks withdrawal of the same on account of low tax ef...
The Commissioner of Income vs M/S Armour Consultants P Ltd
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
2026:MHC:324IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR TC(A) Nos. 370 and 606 of 2013 The Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai. ..Appellant(s) in both T.C.(A)s Vs M/s.Armour Consultants Pvt Ltd ..Respondent(s) in both 2A, Prakasam Road, T.Nagar T.C.(A)s Chennai 600 017 Common Prayer : Appeals filed under Section 260A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras D Bench, Chennai dated 02.05.2012 and 08.09.2011 in ITA Nos.296/Mds/2012 and 296/Mds/2009 for the assessment years 2006 2007 and 2005 2006. For Appellant(s): Mr.T.Ravikumar Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent(s): Mr.R.SivaramanCOMMON JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was delivered by Dr.Anita Sumanth J.) Mr.T.Ravikumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel, appearing for the appellant / Department would submit that the Income-Tax Department does not wish to pursue these ap...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs M/S Vsl India P Ltd
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
2026:MHC:318IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.01.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR The Commissioner of Income tax, .. Appellant vs M/s.VSL India Pvt. Ltd., 602B, 6th Floor, Campus 4B, RMZ Millenia Business Park, 143, Dr.MGR Road, Kandanchavady, Chennai 600096. .. Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras D Bench, Chennai dated 19.03.2013 in I.T.A. No.1212/Mds/2012 for the assessment year 2007-08. For Appellant : Dr.S.Sathiyanarayanan Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent : Mr.T.VasudevanDR. ANITA SUMANTH,J.andMUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR,J.JUDGMENT(Delivered by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH.,J) Dr.S.Sathiyanarayanan, learned Senior Standing Counsel, appearing for the appellant / Department would submit that the Income- Tax Department does not wish to pursue this appeal qua assessment year 2007-08 and seeks withdrawal...
Government of Tamil Nadu vs N Muthusamy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
C.M.P.No.8609 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.36138 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDP.DHANABAL, J.(Order of the Court was made by R. SURESH KUMAR, J.) This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 195 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard the learned Government Advocate Government Pleader for the petitioners.3. Though the respondent has been served and the name of the respondent has been printed in the cause list, none appears for the respondent either in person or through counsel.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. (R.S.K., J.) (P.D.B., J.) 27.01.2026 mp https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Commissioner of Income vs M/S Adyar Gate Hotel Ltd
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
2026:MHC:323IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR The Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai ..Appellant(s) Vs M/s Adyar Gate Hotel Ltd 132, TTK Road ..Respondent(s) Chennai - 600 018 For Appellant(s): Mr. T.Ravikumar Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Venkatanarayanan for M/s.Subbaraya Aiyar Padmanabhan DR.ANITA SUMANTH J. AND Page1 of 2 MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR J.Judgment(Judgment of the Court was delivered by Dr.Anita Sumanth J.) Mr.T.Ravikumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant / Department would submit that the Income-Tax Department does not wish to pursue this appeal qua assessment year 2007-08 and seeks withdrawal of the same on account of low tax effect, per Circular bearing No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024.2. Recording the aforesaid submissions, this Tax Case (Appeal) is dismissed as withdrawn leaving the questions of law ope...
T.Selvan vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSET.Selvan, S/o. Theerthagiri, No.88, 4th Puthar Street, 16th Ward, Ambedkar Nagar, Harur Post And Taluk, Dharmapuri District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The District Collector, 2.The District Revenue Officer, 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Harur Taluk, Dharmapuri District. 4.The Tahsildar, Harur Tlauk, Dharmapuri District. 5.Dinesh, S/o Ramasamy, No.197, Saraswathi Nagar, Yercard Road, Gormedu, Salem 636 008. Respondent(s)PRAYER:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to dispose of the petitioners representation dated 30.08.2023 and to cancel the patta issued in respect of property in survey No 174 /1B Thambal Village, Harur Taluk, Dharmapuri District of an extent of 1 acre on stipulated time as may fixed by this Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Satheesh Kumar for M/s.Vidya. R For Respondent...
G.Ebenezer Alfred vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE AND WMP NO. 10602 OF 2025,WMP NO. 10601 OF 20251. G.Ebenezer Alfred 2.Sowri Sobana. A Petitioner(s) Vs1. The District CollectorCollectorate Ofice, Kancheepuram, 2.The District Revneue Officer 3.The Tahsildar Walajabad Kancheepuram District 631 Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the Respondents 1 to 3 herein not to proceed with any construction activities in S. No 613/5 frontage area by obstructing the access to the petitioners properly and interfering with the petitioner peaceful possession and enjoyment of their properties measuring an total extent of 1 acre 23 cents, comprised in S.No 613/4, situated at No 545, Uthukkadu Junction road, uthukkadu village and Post, Walajabad 631 605, Kancheepuram District, without following due process of lawFor Petitioner(s): Mr.G.Balasubramanian M/s LEELA AND CO For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Jayaprakash,GA FOR R1 TO R3.ORDERThis writ petition has been filed ...
Rajeshwari vs the District Collector Cum District Magistrate
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P. Nos.18264 and 23698 of 2024 Rajeshwari .. Petitioner vs 5.Karunanidhi .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 12.09.2023 more particularly the 1 st respondent being the officer appointed as an Arbitrator or Mediator to conduct formalenquiry under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizen Act to restore the properties to petitioner situated at 1)Thiruttani Village Survey Nos.22/7, 9 and 10 measuring 1582 sq.ft subjected property in sale deed Document No.2589/1987 2)Amirthapuram Village Survey Nos.114/8, 9 and 10, 115/6, 7, 8, 9, 12 and 14 measuring an extent of Acres 2.35 cents subjected to Sale Deed Document No.4/1994 on the file of SRO, Thiruttani 3)Amirthapuram Village Survey ...
Mr. Gopala Krishnan Vs Tmt. K.M.Sarayu, I.A.S., and 4 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Gopala Krishnan ...Petitioner Vs. 1.K.M.Sarayu, IAS, The Collector, 2.Sadhanaikural, The District Revenue Officer, 3.C.Babu, The Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri, Bangalore Road Highways, 4.Sathya The Tahsildar, Pochampalli Taluk, Pochampalli Post and Taluk, Krishnagiri District 635 206. 5.Subramani, The Block Development Officer, Kaveripattinam, Kaveripattinam Post and Taluk, Krishnagiri District 635 112. ...Respondents PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience and non-compliance of the order dated 25.07.2023 made in W.P.No.27980 of 2022 on the file of this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sakthivel for Mr.J.Cehlladurai Caldwell For Respondents : Mr.D.Ravichander, Spl.Govt. PleaderORDER(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAM...
Vemana Praburam Vs Assessment Unit
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and WMP.Nos.11158 & 11159 of 2023 Vemana Praburam 49, Sri Sai Nilaya, Moosa Street, T. Nagar, Chennai - 600017, Tamil Nadu, Also residing at, 21216 n 96th Ave, Peoria, Arizona, US 85382. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Chennai 600 034,Tamil Nadu. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records and quashing the Impugned Order under Section 147 r.w.s. 144 read with Section 144B of the Page1 of 4Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 13.03.2023, bearing DIN ITBA/AST/S/147/2022- 2015-16 and the consequential Notice of Demand under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 13.03.2023, bearing DIN ITBA/AST/S/156/2022- For Petitioner(s): M/s.M.V.Swaroop For Respondent(s): Mr.Avinash Krishnan Ravi Senior Standing CounselORDERIn this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned orderdated 1...
- ‹ Prev
- 330
- 331
- 332
- 333
- 334
- 336
- 337
- 338
- 339
- 340
- Next ›
- Last »