Chennai Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Venkatasubramani @ Venkatasubramaniam Vs The State Rep.by, The Inspect ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR Venkatasubramani @ Venkatasubramaniam ... Petitioner / Accused Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Salem District. (Crime No.Not Known of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Crime No.Not known of 2025, pending investigation on the file of the respondent. For Petitioners : Mr. S.N. Arunkumar For Respondent : M/s. J.R. Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ******K. RAJASEKAR, J.stnORDERToday, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dis...
The Executive Engineer Vs V.DHANASEKARAN
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.M.P.No.3201 of 2026 in Rev.Aplw.Sr.No.12211 of 2026 1.The Executive Engineer, Coimbatore 641 017. 2.The Assistant Engineer, Coimbatore 641 017. Petitioners vs. V.Dhanasekaran Respondent Writ Miscellaneous Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking condonation of delay of 173 days in filing the review petition against the order dated 03.07.2025 made in W.P.No.16396 of 2025.For Petitioners : Mr.L.Jaivenkatesh For Respondent : Mr.N.Karthikeyan ***** N.ANAND VENKATESH, JORDERThis petition has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 173 days in filing the review application against the order dated 03.07.2025 made in W.P.No.16396 of 2025.2. Heard learned counsel on either side.3. Satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed and the delay of 173 days in filing the review application is ...
Mariyappan Vs State Rep by Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR1. Mariyappan S/o. Manngatti, 1/41, Mariyamman Kovil Street, Aviyur, Tirukkoyilur, Viluppuram - 605 757. and 3 Others2. Angammal Aviyur, Tirukkoyilur, Viluppuram 6053. Vadamalai S/o. Kaliyaperumal, 1/41, Mariyamman Kovil Street, Aviyur, Tirukkoyilur, Viluppuram - 605 757.4. Kala Devi G/o. Sakthivel, 108, PillaiyarKovil Street, Tirukkoyilur, Viluppuram - 605 757. Petitioner(s) Vs1. State Rep by Inspector of Police Thirukoilur Police Station, Kallakurichi District. Crime No. 47 of 2026. Respondent(s)PRAYER To enlarge the petitioner on Anticipatory bail in the event of the arrest in connection with the Crime. 47 of 2026, on the file of Respondent Police and pass such other orders and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): D Jeevitha For Respondent(s): M/S.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleg...
Fujitec India Private Limited Rep.by Mr.V.Muralidhar, Director- Financ ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
1 A No. 458 of 2026IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Fujitec India Private Limited Rep.by Mr.V.Muralidhar, Director- Finance Plot No. P-52, 1st Cross Road, 8th Avenue Mahindra World City, Chengalpattu, Kancheepuram 603 004. Applicant(s) Vs1. Nivasti Developers LLP D-4/5/6, 1st Floor, Bldg Splash, Above Bank of Baroda Sector 17, Vashi, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra 400 703. Respondent(s)PRAYER To condone the delay of 19 days in representation of the above application. For Applicant: Mr.Eshwar Sabapathy 2 A No. 458 of 2026 N.ANAND VENKATESH J. kpORDERThis petition has been filed to condone the delay in filing the petition. 2.Heard. 3.This Court is satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the above petition and accordingly, the delay is condoned. 30-01-2026 Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No kp...
Ramyapriya, Vs The Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
2026:MHC:432IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN AND CMP NO. 2254 OF 2026,CMP NO. 2258 OF 2026 Ramyapriya ..Appellant(s) Vs1. The Secretary to Government Health and Family Welfare Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-092. The Director of Medical Education Poonamallee High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-103. The Director of Medial and Rural Health services DMS Building, Annasalai, Teynampet, Chennai-064. The Chairman Tamilnadu Public service commission, TNPSC Road, Broadway, Chennai-03 ..Respondent(s) Page1 of 6Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent issuing writ of certiorari mandamus, to set aside the Order dated 12.01.2026 passed in W.P.No.1155 of 2026 and thus render justice. For Appellant(s): Mr.K.S.Viswanathan, Senior Counsel For Mr.Ali Hassan Khan For Respondent(s): Mr.K.Tippu Sultan, Government Advocate For Rr1 To 3.Judgment(Judgment of the Court was delive...
K S Plastochem Inc Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.3421, 3426, 3430 and 3432 of 2026 K.S.Plastochem Inc, GSTIN 33AAWFK6896Q1ZY, Represented by its Partner, Kuppan. ... Petitioner in both W.Ps. Vs. 1.The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Koyambedu Assessment Circle, No.1, PAPJM Annexue Building, Greams Road, Chennai 600 006. 2.The Deputy Commissioner (ST), GST Appeal Chennai Central, Greams Road, Main Building, 2nd Floor, Chennai 600 006. ... Respondents in both W.Ps. Prayer in W.P.No.3028 of 2026: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of impugned order under Section 74 dated 05.08.2025 having Reference No.ZD330825037027H passed by the 1st Respondent for the financial year 2024-25 and Appeal rejection order having Reference No.ZD3301261529792 dated 22.01.2026 passed by the 2nd Respondent and quash the same as illegal, e...
R.V.Mohanasundaram Vs G.Pavathal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL in A.S.SR.No.118527 of 2021 R.V.Mohanasundaram S/o. Late Vaiyapuri Gounder, D.No.7, Kalyanasundaram Street, Ragupathynaicken Palayam, Moolapalayam Post, Erode-02. ..Appellant(s) Vs1. G.Pavathal W/o. Late Govindasamy, D.No.244, Chinniampalayam, Erode-104.2. P.Nallammal W/o. Late Palanisamy, D.No.345D, Muniappan Kovil Street, Manickampalayam, Erode-04.3. K.Suseela Devi Page1 of 4 W/o. Nataraj, D/o. Late Karuppannan, D.No.29, Karukkankattoor, Olapalayam Post, Perundurai Taluk, ErodeDistrict.4. N.Thulasimani W/o. Late Nataraj,5. N.N.Deepa D/o. Late Nataraj,6. The District Revenue Officer7. The District Collector Page2 of 4 ..Respondent(s) Petition filed under Section 149 of CPC to condone the delay of 1459 days in re-presenting the above As. Sr.No.118527 of 2021. For Appellant(s): Mr.N.Manokaran for Mr.D.RaghuORDER(Order of the Court was ma...
Dharman (a) Dharmalingam Vs The District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
2026:MHC:402IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN W.P.No.3059 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.3458 of 2026 Dharman @ Dharmalingam ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The District Collector, Tiruvannamalai, 2.The Tahsildar, Vandavasi Taluk, 3.The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat), Mangalam Mamandur Panchayat, Vandavasi, Tiruvannamalai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the 3 rd respondent in impugned proceedings dated 19.01.2026 and quash the same as illegal and without jurisdiction.For Petitioner : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar for M/s.K.M.Vijayan Associates For Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran, Spl. Govt. Pleader for R1 & R2 Mr.T.K.Saravanan, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R3 *****ORDER(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.,) The present Writ Petition has been in...
Thiru. Kumara Kurubaran, IAS., Vs Thiru. R.Munusawmy and 3 others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
Sub Application (OS) No.97 of 2026 in Cont.P.No.2823 of 2023P.B.BALAJI, J.This dispensed with petition stands ordered. 2.The personal appearance of the Applicant / 1st respondent before this Court is hereby dispensed with for the present. 30.01.2026 (1/2) kas https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
K.Shanmugham vs M.K.Basheer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASJudgment reserved on : 10.12.2025 Judgment pronounced on : 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI A.S.No.135 of 2023 & CMP.No.5287 of 2023 K.A.Shanmugham ..Appellant Vs. M.K.Basheer ..RespondentPrayer: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of CPC, to set aside the judgmentand decree dated 01.09.2022 passed in O.S.No.534 of 2017 on the file of the III Additional District Court, Coimbatore. For Appellant : Mr.K.Govi Ganesan For Respondents : Mr.K.SudhakarJUDGMENTThe plaintiff in a suit for specific performance, is the appellant in the above appeal suit.2.Pleadings: The plaint in brief: The plaintiff entered into a registered agreement of sale on 07.12.2015 to purchase the properties belonging to the defendant, for a total sale consideration of Rs.10,50,000/-. The agreement was registered in Doc.No.13846 of 2015. On the date of the agreement, the plaintiff paid Rs.10,00,000/- as advance. It was agreed that the balance Rs.50,0...
- ‹ Prev
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- Next ›
- Last »