Chennai Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tvl Balaji Health Care Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.3505 and 3506 of 2026 Tvl.Balaji Health Care, GSTIN:33CBFPS7721G1ZL Represented by its Proprietor Subramaniam Sangeetha, 568, 1st Floor, N V N Layout, Cross Cut Road, Coimbatore 641 012. ... Petitioner Vs. The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Gandhipuram Assessment Circle, Coimbatore 641 018. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari call for the records pertaining to the impugned Order in Form GST DRC 07 bearing reference no.ZD330125303469M/2020-2021 dated 31.01.2025 issued by the sole respondent and quash the same.For Petitioner : Mr.Durairaj For Respondent : Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran Government AdvocateORDERMr.V.Prashanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent.2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the lea...
D.Jagan Mohan vs the Principal Commissioner
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY D.Jagan Mohan S/o. Late Radha Krishna Chetty, No.75/1 Church Gate Avenue, Tansi Nagar, Velacherry East, Chennai-600 042. ..PetitionerVs T.Nagar and Mylapore Division, No.130, R.K.Mutt Road, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. (2nd Respondent suo motu impleaded by this Court vide order dated 30.01.2026 by SKRJ) ..Respondents Page1 of 4Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd Respondent to consider petitioner representation dated 29.11.2025 to issue no objection certificate and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to issue patta in favour of the petitioner for the property situated at plot No.75, in Survey No.274/4, VGP Dr. Seethapathy Nagar Extension, Velachery Village, Chennai.For Petitioner: Mr.N.Baaskaran For Respondents: Mr.Abishek Murthy, Govt. AdvocateORDERThe petitioner asserts...
Sultana Jehan Begum vs the Registrar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
2026:MHC:384IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P.No.692 of 2026 Sultana Jehan Begum ..Petitioner Vs1. The Registrar, Tamil Nadu Teachers Education University (TNTEU) Chennai.2. The Regional Director, National Council for Teacher Education University (NCTE) New Delhi.3. The Principal, Our Lady College of Education, Maduravoyal, Chennai.4. The Registrar,Pondicherry University, Bharat Ratna Dr. B.R.Ambedkar Administrative Building, R.V.Nagar, Kalapet, Puducherry 605 014. (R4 Suo Motu impleaded vide Order dated 19.01.2026 made in W.P.No.582/2026) ..Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue the M.Ed. Program for the academic year 2025-2027 in the third respondent College, for which she was already admitted after verification of certificates and payment of fee...
Venkatachalam Vs The Inspector General of Registration
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY Venkatachalam S/o.Mahalingam, No.9/1-9, Kolkaranur village, Mecheri- 636 453, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. ..Petitioner Vs1. The Inspector General of Registration2. The District Registrar3. The Sub-Registrar,..Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records Page1 of 4of the impugned Refusal Slip dated 16.12.2025 in Refusal No.RFL/ Mecheri /58/ 2025 issued by the 3rd respondent and quash the same, and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to register the settlement deed of the petitioner dated 16.12.2025 in respect of his property in survey No.322/4A (New S.No.4A1A1A1), measuring to an extent of 3281 sq.ft., situated at Mecheri village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District.For Petitioner: Mr. M.R.Jothimanian For Respondents: Mr.U.Baranidharan, Spl. G.P.ORDER...
Ms System Care and Solutions Vs The Assisteant commissioner(st)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHYMs System Care and Solutions Rep by its Proprietor Hariharasudhan, No.3/299, First Floor, Periyar Salai, PalavakkamKancheepuram, Tamil Nadu-600 041 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Room No.218,II Floor, Nandanam, Chennai-600 035 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the impugnedOrder of rejection of application for rectification dated 08.07.2025 bearingReference ZD330725074661A along with its annexure and the impugned Orderdated 25.02.2025 in Form GST DRC-07 bearing Reference No. ZD330225258472J along with its annexure of the Respondent passed in Petitioners GSTIN 33ACHPH8470L1ZB for the FY 2020-21 and quash the same. Page1 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Anish Kumar For Respondent(s): Ms.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran, Government Advocate *...
KISHOREKUMAR Vs The State Rep by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Kishorekumar..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep by The Inspector of Police, (Crime No. 681 of 2024) ..Respondent(s) Prayer: To extend the time by two weeks to this petition to surrender before the lower court in pursuance with order dated 02.04.2025 made in crl mp.no.6412 of 2025 in crl op.no.1723 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): M/s.P.M.Jayachandran For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to extend the time for complying the conditions as per the order of this Court in in Crl MP No.6412 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.1723 of 2025 dated 02.04.2025. Page1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.GBI2. After hearing the submissions made by the learned Counsel on eitherside, this Court is inclined to extend ten days time to comply the conditions imposed by this Court in Crl MP No.6412 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.1723 of 2025, dated 02.04....
M.Madheshwaran Vs The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA M.Madheshwaran ..Petitioner Vs2. Dhanapal3. Jothimani..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita to invoke its supervisory Jurisdiction and issue an appropriate order or direction, to the respondent Police to expedite and complete the investigation in Crime No.1 of 2024 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Economic offences wing, Krishnagiri, and to file the final report before the competent Court within a fixed time frame, in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Saran PrasadFor Respondent : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for R1 Page1 of 4ORDERThe present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the first respondent Police to complete the investigation and file a final report in Crime No.1 of 2024 before the jurisdictional Court.2. When the matter w...
M/s. Apple Builders Vs The Deputy State Tax officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.No.2893 and W.M.P.Nos.3226 and 3227 of 2026 and W.P.No.2891 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.3222 and 3225 of 2026M/s.APPLE BUILDERS, Rep.by its Partner, Having Office at: No.6/338A, Pallavarman Street, Pareri, Singaperumal Koil, Kancheepuram District, Tamil Nadu 603 204. ... Petitioner in both cases Vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer, Chengalpet Assessment Circle, Chengalpet 603 101. ... Respondent in both cases Prayer in 2891 of 2026: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, tocall for the records in connection with the impugned orderGSTIN:33AAVFA4887C1Z7/2020-21 dated 11.01.2025 passed by the respondent and quash the same and consequentially to direct the respondent to conduct re-assessment, subsequently directing the respondent allow the petitioner to file GSTR-09. Prayer in 2893 of ...
SIBA BEHERA Vs State rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Siba Behera ..Petitioner(s) Vs State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, PEW Poonamallee Police Station, Chennai. Cr.No.143 of 2025. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This petition is field under Section 483 of BNSS to enlarge the petitioner on bail on the file of II Additional Special Court in EC and NDPS Court at Chennai in C.C.No.1695 of 2025. For Petitioner(s): M/s.M. Sarath Kumar P.Hariganesh For Respondent(s): MR.A. Gopinath, Govt Advocate Page1 of 6ORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 15.09.2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(c), 29(1) of NDPS Act in Crime No.143 of 2025 registered on the file of the respondent, seeks bail.2.The case of the prosecution is that on15.09.2025 the respondent police received a information that some persons near Poonamalle Bus stand involved in illegal transportation of contraband. Based on that, t...
K.Govindan vs the Managing Director
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI 1 K.Govindan 2 K.Sundaram 3 V.Arunagiri 4 A.Thamaraikannan 5 G.Selvam 6 M.Selvaraju 7 A.Rajendran ... Petitioners Vs. Chennai 600 002. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay interest @ 10% for the belated payment of terminal benefits such as Gratuity, For Petitioner : Mr.S.T.Varadarajalu For Respondents : Ms.S.Pavithra for R1, R2 Mr.C.S.K.Sathish for R3ORDERBy consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 2.The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay interest @ 10% for the belated payment of terminal benefits such as Gratuity, 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners who had joined the services of the respondentCorporation, h...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »