Chennai Court August 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M. Chandrasekaran vs the Manager
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-28-2025
in Challenging the award passed in M.C.O.P.No.398 of 2016, the petitioner preferred the above Cross Objections, however there is a delay of 108 days in representing the above Cross Objections arose. Hence, the present petition has been filed to condone the delay in representing the above appeal.2. Mr.J.Mahalingam, learned counsel for petitioner submitted that theabove Cross Objections was returned for rectifying certain defects on 21.12.2023 and again on 07.05.2024, however, the required documents were not get by VI Judge, Court of Small Causes at Chennai and thereafter, papers wer misplaced with other bundles and it could not be traced immediately. Thereafter, after due search, it was traced out. Hence, there is a delay of 108 days arose in representing the above appeal and the said delay caused is neither willful nor wanton, but for the above said reasons. Accordingly, he has filed the above petition.3. Mr.P.Suresh Srinivasan, learned counsel for 1st respondent appeared and raised st...
The Government of Tamil Nadu vs M Chandran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-28-2025
C.M.P.No.6071 of 2025 in WA.SR.No.17181 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDK.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.Order of the Court was made byR.Suresh Kumar,J.This petition is filed to dispense with the production of original impugned order. Ordered as prayed for. (R.S.K.,J.) (K.G.T.,J.) 28.08.2025 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Managing Director Vs Nasreen Taj
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-08-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI AND CMA SR NO. 122283 OF 2022 The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport, Corporation Limited (Villupuram) Division, Vellore Region Veloore. Appellant(s) Vs1. Nasreen Taj2.Minor. Roshan Jameer (Minor rep by next friend Mother and Natural guardian Nasreen Taj 3.Minor. Hefza (Minor rep by next friend Mother and Natural guardian Nasreen Taj 4.Aseefa 5.Waheeda 6.Syed Khadar 7.Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd., No. 570 Nalgaum cross road, Next to Royal Estate Wadala (w) Mumbai - 400 031. Respondent(s) PRAYER To condone the delay of 2515 days in filing the above CMA Sr.No.122283 of For Appellants: Mr. C.R.Sureshkumar For Respondents: RR 1, 4 and 5 - Insufficient Address RR 6 and 7 - Left RR 2 and 3 - Minors (rep. By R1)ORDERThis Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 2515 days in filing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the award dat...
R. Thiiyagarajan vs M.Muthuraman
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.08.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI R.Thiyagarajan ...Petitioner Vs. M.Muthuraman ...Respondent Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to direct the Sub Court, Chidambaram to dispose O.S.No.69 of 2024 within stipulated time by allowing this Revision Petition. For Petitioner : Mr.C.PrakasamORDERThe present revision petition has been filed by the defendant seeking expeditious disposal of the suit filed for permanent injunction in O.S.No.69 of 2024 before the Sub Court, Chidambaram. Page No.1 of 42. Considering the limited request made by the petitioner, notice to the respondent is dispensed with.3. Pursuant to my order dated 13.08.2025, the learned SubordinateJudge, Chidambaram in D.No.708 of 2025 dated 21.08.2025 has written to the Registry of this Court stating that the pleadings are completed and the same is pending for framing issues. Hence, the learned Subordinate Judge, Chidambar...
Parvathi Vs R. Karuppiah
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-28-2025
C.M.A.No.1294 of 2023T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.Today, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is listed under the caption, For Being Mentioned at the instance of learned counsel for Appellant/Claimant.2. The learned counsel appearing for Appellant/Claimant submittedthat this Court vide Judgment dated 28.08.2025, partly allowed C.M.A.No.1294 of 2023. In the present case, the Tribunal had awarded a sum of Rs.24,27,600/- under the head, Loss of Dependency and this Court has enhanced the said amount as Rs.37,80,000/-. The calculation of enhanced Loss of Dependency has been clearly reflected in Paragraph No.9 of the Judgment dated 28.08.2025 in C.M.A.No.1294 of 2023.2.1. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for Appellant/Claimant that since the amount awarded under the head, Loss of Dependency has been enhanced as Rs.37,80,000/-, the total amount of compensation is ought to have been enhanced as Rs.38,50,000/-. However, in the Tabulation in Paragraph No.10 of the Judgment dated 28.08.2025 in C.M...
M.RAMU(Died),1. Vithya Selvam Vs VIJAYAN
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.08.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE N.MALA CMP Nos. 5424 to 5426 of 2025 in Vs M.Ramu Vs and 8 Others CMP NO. 5425 of 2025 Vs CMP NO. 5426 of 2025 Vs CMP NO. 5424 of 2025 Usha Ramman R Venkatesulu D E Anisree Sangavi M/s.Usha Raman Rr1 And 6 - Insufficient Address R8 - Door Locked R2 - Dinakaran R3 - Ashok Kumar R4 - Ramesh Babu R5 - Gowri R7 - Bhavani R9 - Vaijayanthi Mala CMP NO. 5425 of 2025 Usha Ramman R Venkatesulu D E Anisree Sangavi CMP NO. 5426 of 2025 For Appellant(s): Usha RammanORDERThe above petitions are filed to condone the delay of 2814 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement in bringing the legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant viz., M.Ramu; to bring on records the legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant viz., M.Ramu, as proposed appellants 1 to 3, and to set aside the abatement in bringing the legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant viz., Mr.Ramu in the second appeal. 2.Being satisfied w...
Leelavathi Vs Kalai Rani, and Another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.08.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Leelavathi ... Petitioner Vs.1. Kalai Rani, Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Vepery, Chennai- 600 007.2. Mr.Rajkumar,The Sherishtadarar, Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. ... Respondents Prayer: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for their willful, wanton and disobedience of the order in Crl.OP.No.20009 of 2024 dated 09.09.2024 passed by this Hon'ble High Court. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Samivel For Respondents : Mr.S.Udayakumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R1 : Mr. Prakash Goklaney for R2ORDERPursuant to the order of this Court dated 18.07.2025, the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore Chennai has conducted an enquiry regarding the missing document. The report of the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate has concluded as below: I further submit that if the Police offici...
S.Vinayak vs the State Rep by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON : 19.08.2025PRONOUNCED ON : 28.08.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.R.C.No.389 of 2023 and Crl.M.P.No.2991 of 2023 S.Vinayak ... PetitionerVersusThe State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Nagapattinam Town Police Station, Nagapattinam. ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Revision has been filed under Sections 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to call for the records pertaining to Crl.M.P.No.2186 of 2022 (old Cr.M.P.No.447 of 2018) dated 15.02.2023 in S.C.No.152 of 2018 pending on the file of Principal Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam and to set aside the said order dated 15.02.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Balu For Mr.R.Ganesan For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis Criminal Revision Case has been preferred against theorder dated 15.02.2023 passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge,Nagapattinam, in Crl.M.P.No.2186 of 2022 in S.C.No.152 of 2018, thereby dismissing the p...
S.R. Dominic(Died) vs S.K. Padmanabhan(Died)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-28-2025
2025:MHC:2109IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on 25.07.2025Pronounced on 28.08.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN S.A.No.477 of 2011 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 1.S.R.Dominic (died) 2.Reeta (A2 brought on record as legal heir of the deceased sole appellant vide Court order dated 10.07.2025 made in C.M.P.Nos.26995, 26987 & 26999 of 2023) ... Appellants / Plaintiffs Vs. 1.S.K.Padmanabhan (died) 2.Irudhayamary (died) 3.P.Louis Arokiaraj 4.P.Amalraj 5.P.Albert Victor 6.P.Albert James 7.Amoloper Leelamary (Died) 8.Maria Selvaraj 9.L.Samsolomon10.L.Vasundra (R1 & R2 died. RR3 to 8 are brought on record as legal heirs of the deceased R1 & R2. R7 died. RR9 and 10 are brought on record as legal heirs of the deceased R7 vide order dated 10.07.2025 made in CMP.Nos.13642, 13647 & 13650 of 2025 & CMP.Nos.26982, 26984, 26988, 26993 & 26994 of 2023) ... Respondents / Defendants Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC....
Senthil Kumar vs State Rep.by, the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.08.2025CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Senthilkumar .. PetitionerVersusState Rep by, Inspector of Police, Ammapet Police Station, Salem District. Crime No.575 of 2017. .. Respondent Prayer : Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 397 & 401 ofCr.P.C.,/ under Section 438 r/w 422 of BNSS Act to set aside the judgmentpassed in C.C.No.165 of 2017, dated 30.01.2023 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Salem confirmed in C.A.No.33 of 2023, dated 04.01.2025 on the file of the learned III Additional District Judge, Salem. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Muruganantham For Respondent : Mr.J.Subbiah, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis Criminal Revision Case is filed challenging the judgment of the learned III Additional District Judge, Salem, dated 04.01.2025 made in Crl.A.No.33 of 2023. By the said judgment, the conviction and sentence imposed on the petitioner/accused by the Trial Court, was con...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »