Chennai Court August 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.Kamalakannan vs K.Leelavathy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on : 11.08.2025Pronounced on : 29.08.2025CoramThe Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.V.KARTHIKEYAN T.O.S.No.14 of 20081.K.Kamalakkannan 2.S.Selvi (Deceased) 3.B.Geetha (Deceased) 4.K.S.Suresh 5.K.S.Shankaranarayanan 6.K.Prema 7.K.Nithyanandham 8.K.Anand 9.S.Jothilakshmi ...Plaintiffs Vs 1.K.Leelavathy 2.K.Mallika 3.Sudha 4.Kalavathy 5.Bhuvaneswari 6.Vijayalakshmi ...Defendants Plaintiffs 4 and 5 and 3rd defendant brought on record as LRs of the deceased 2nd plaintiff and the 4th to 6th defendants brought on record as LRs of the deceased3rd plaintiff and the amendment carried out as per order dated 21.02.2024 in A.No.922 of 2024 in T.O.S.No.14 of 2008. Plaintiff 6 to 9 brought on record as legal representatives of the deceased 1st plaintiffand the amendment carried out as per order04.06.2025 in A.No.1591/2025 in T.O.S.No.14 of 2008 Prayer: This Testamentary Original Suit filed under Sections 232 & 276 of the Indian Succession Act XXXIX of 19...
A.W.S.Jayachitra vs S. Padmanaban
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
in This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 48 days in representing the above CMA.SR.No.9911 of 2019.2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant(s) and perused the material available in the record.3. On being satisfied with the averments stated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition, and finding the reason assigned by the petitioner(s) to be justifiable. Therefore, the delay in filling CMA.SR.No.9911 of 2019 is condoned.4. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous petition is allowed.5. Registry is directed to list the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order. Registry is further directed to print the name of the learned counsel appearing for the appellants. smn smn in...
The Divisional Manager, vs P. Murugesan (Since Deceased) 1. M B Suresh
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-08-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CMP NO. 1931 OF 2025,CMP NO. 1925 OF 2025,CMP NO. 1938 OF 2025 in C.M.P.No. 10179 of 2024 in CMA SR NO. 55011 OF 20241. The Divisional Manager The New India Assurance Company Ltd DO , 1 Bharathi Road, Cuddalore 607 001. Appellant(s) Vs1. P MurugesanS/o.Perumal, No.50(3) Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Nellikuppam, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore 607 105. 2.M.B.Suresh Proprietor, Supraha Driving School, Chennai 600 106. Respondent(s) CMP No. 1931 of 20251. The Divisional Manager, The New India Assurance Co. Ltd, No.1, Bharath Road, Cuddalore 607 001. Appellant(s) Vs1. P. Murugesan (since Deceased) 1. MB Suresh Suprah Driving School, 1/6, 7th Street, Jai Nagar, Arumbakkam, Chennai 600 106. 2.VIRUTHAMBAL W/o. Late. P. Murugesan, No 50/3 3.A. Latha 4.C. Anitha 5.Annapoorani 6.V.Kavitha 7.M. Venkatesa Prabu S/o.Late. P. Murugesan, No 50/3 8.M. Sundaramoorthy S/o.Late. P. Murugesan, No 50/3 Respondent(s) ...
H.Sumathi vs H.Rani @ Raniammal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON : 21.08.2025PRONOUNCED ON : 29.08.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI and C.M.P. No.5929 of 2024 H. Sumathi ... Petitioner vs.1. H. Rani @ Raniammal2. K. Harikrishnan ... RespondentsPrayer : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to call for the entire records relating to O.P. No.3602/2022 on the file of III Additional Family Court Judge at Chennai and to strike-off the same on merits in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr. R. Krishnamurthy For Respondents : No appearance ------ORDERThis revision has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to strike off O.P. No.3602 of 2022 on the file of III Additional Family Court, Chennai.2. I have heard Mr.R. Krishnamurthy, learned counsel for the revision petitioner. Despite service of notice on the respondents, the respondents have neither appeared in person, nor through a counsel.3. The counsel for the petitioner would i...
Dhanraj N. Kochar vs Hemant Raj
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASOrder reserved on : 06.08.2025 Order pronounced on : 29.08.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI & CMP.Nos.5114 & 4292 of 2025 Dhanraj N.Kochar ..Petitioner in both CRPs Vs. 1.Hemant Raj 2.H.M.Foundations Private Limited, Rep. by Mr.Hemant Raj, No.32, Audiappa Naicken Street, Sowcarpet, Chennai 600 001 Goswami Krishna Chandraji (died) 3.Madhusudan Goswami 4.K.Vasantha 5.S.Kalyanasundaram 6.Krishnapriya 7.Muralimanohar 8.Krishnakant 9.Rama Goswami ..Respondents in both CRPs [Respondents 6 to 9 impleaded as LRs of late Goswami Krishna Chandraji by order dated 24.07.2003] Common Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 10.01.2025 passed in I.A.Nos.4 & 2 of 2024 in O.S.Nos.5418 of 1996 and 4978 of 1997 on the file of the XI Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.(In both CRPs) For Petitioner : Mr.Nithyesh Nataraj for Mr.Anirudh A.Srir...
S.Kandasamy vs M/S.Canara Bank
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.08.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN S.KANDASAMY : Petitioner Vs 1.M/S.CANARA BANK REP BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER 2.RESERVEN BANK OF INDIA THROUGH THE OFFICE OF BANKING OMBUDSMAN RAJAJI SALAI, CHENNAI-600 001 : Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent is against theguidelines and instructions issued by the RBI and forebear the 1strespondent herein from conducting forthcoming E-Auction which is illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to take appropriate action for the same. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Singaravelan, Senior Counsel for Mr.Harish Kumar For Respondents : Mr.M.A.Abdul Wahab, for R-1ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)Taking into consideration the submission of the learned Senior Counsel for t...
P.Rudhra vs P.Palanivel(Died)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-08-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI and C.M.P.No.4960 of 20251. P.Rudhra2. P.Keerthi3. P.Ramya Petitioner(s) Vs1. P.Palanivel(died)Respondent-1 Died. Respondent-2(who is already on record) are recorded as LRs of the deceased R-1 P.Palanivel as per memo seal dated.03/04/2025 are recorded and vide court order dated.21/04/2025 made in TR.CMP No.255 of 2025 in CMP No.4960 of 2025 by PTAJ. 2.P.Sivagami 3.P.Malaleena Respondent(s) PRAYER: This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of CPC to withdraw the suit in O.S. No. 108 / 2011 on the file of the Additional District Judge, (Special Court for Prevention of SC/ST Atrocities) Namakkal and to transfer the same to Principle District Court, Salem.For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.Vijayakumar For Respondent(s): M/s.S.Dhayaleswaran for R3 R1 - Died (steps Taken) R2 - NAORDERThis Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed seeking direction of this Court to withdra...
D.Thulasi Bhai vs D.Sanniyasi Rao
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.08.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN1.D.Thulasi Bhai 2.S.DhanalaPavani ..... Petitioners Vs D.Sanniyasi Rao ..... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for records and set aside the order passed in MC.No.88 of 2017 dated 25.03.2021 passed by the learned V Additional Principal Judge, Full Additional Charge of II Additional Family Court, Chennai and enhance the maintenance amount by allowing this criminal revision case. For Petitioners : M/s.S.Vennila For Respondent : No appearanceORDERThis Criminal Revision Case has been filed against the orderpassed in MC.No.88 of 2017 dated 25.03.2021 by the learned V Additional Principal Judge, Full Additional Charge of II Additional Family Court, Chennai, thereby ordering monthly maintenance.2. The first petitioner is the wife of the respondent. They had gotmarried on 27.04.2001. They gave birth to the second pet...
V.Mani vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.08.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN V.Mani : Petitioner Vs Kallakurichi District : Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 1 to 4 to take action and clean the Chitteri Vaaikal situated behind the Gangai Amman Kovil Street, Thirukovilur pursuant to the petitioner's representations dated 10.12.2024 and 11.12.2024.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kingston Jerold For Respondents : Mr.K.Karthik Jegannath, Government Advocate, for respondents 1, 3 and 4 Mr.K.C.Vinodh, for Mr.T.K.Saravanan, for respondent No.2ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) At the outset, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the grievance raised in this petition no longer exists since the channel, Chiteeri Vaikkal, has been cleaned up. There...
Women Lawyers Association of Nilgiris vs the Secretary
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
2025:MHC:2129IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON: 04.08.2025PRONOUNCED ON: 29.08.2025THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANANWomen Lawyers Association of Nilgiris Represented by its President Mrs.R.Revathy Chamber No's.1 & 2 Combined Court Complex Kakkathoppe Finger Post Udhagamandalam-643 006 The Nilgiris District. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu & Puducherry, High Court Campus, Chennai-600 104 2.The Registrar General of Madras High Court, Chennai 3.The Nilgiris District Bar Association, Nilgiris(R2 and R3 are suo motu impleaded as per order dated 28.03.2025 in W.P.No.6176 of 2025) ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in respect of the impugned resolution dated 18.10.2023 made in Resolution No.664/2023 on the file of the respondent herein, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »