Chennai Court August 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.Thangaraj vs R.Hariharan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 16.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR in K.Thangaraj ... Petitioner /Vs./ 1.R.Hariharan 2.G.Balakrishnan 3.All India Sai Samaj represented by its President, 56-B, Alamelumangapuram, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. 4.M.Vasudevan, Secretary, All India Sai Samaj, 5.T.R.Kulasekaran 6.S.Karunakaran Vice President, All India Sai Samraj, 7.Sri Vidyalaya Educational Trust, Represented by its Managing Trustee, S.Karunakran.8.Veeraraghavan 9.S.Subramaniam ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed to clarify the order dated 17.03.2003 in the above O.S.A.No.475 of 2002. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Balagopal For Respondents : Mr.M.BalasubramanianORDER(Order of the Court was made by DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.) We have received interim report dated 10.09.2025 from theInterim Administration Board (Board). The Board has assumed charge on 02.09.2025 and has been handed over the records including the accounts in re...
C.Mangala Vijayalakshmi vs K.S.Kasimaris
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
2025:MHC:2464IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.08.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SENTHILKUMAR O.S.A.Nos.430 & 431 of 2001, Com.Appeal No.17 of 2009 and CMA No.403 of 2007 And CMP.Nos.9992 , 9993 & 9977 of 2025 & & CMP.Nos.8557, 8559 & 2007 of 2025 O.S.A.No.430 of 2001 Mrs.C.Mangala Vijayalakshmi .... Appellant vs 1.K.S.Kasimaris Ceramique (P) Ltd., Rep.by its Managing Director, Mr.K.S.Anantharaman, 50, Pulla Avenue, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai - 30.2.Mr.K.S.Damodharan 3.Mr.K.S.Anantharaman 4.Tmt.Paulthai Shanmugasundaram 5.K.S.Mothilal (deceased) 6.Mr.S.Johnson 7.Mrs.Thirugnanam 8.Mrs.Satya Priya 9.Mr.Deepa Sundaram 10.Mrs.Nandini Devi (R7 to R10 brought on record as LRs of deceased R5 vide order of the Court dated 9/12/2009 made in CMP. Nos.1548 to 1550 of 2009) .. Respondents O.S.A.No.431 of 2001 Mrs.C.Mangala Vijayalakshmi .... Appellant vs1.K.S.Damodharan (Contributory & Chairman) 2.K.S.Kasimari...
Prashanth Krishna Singh vs G.C.Bohra Finance,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on : 04.08.2025Pronounced on : 29.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN C.S.No.201 of 20101.Prashanth Krishna Singh 2.Dushyanth Krishna Singh ... Plaintiffs Vs 1.G.C.Bohra Finance 37, General Muthiah Street, Elephant Gate, Sowcarpet, Chennai 600 079. 2.G.C.Bohra 37, General Muthiah Street, Elephant Gate, Sowcarpet, Chennai 600 079. 3.Rohit Bohra 37, General Muthiah Street, Elephant Gate, Sowcarpet, Chennai 600 079. ... DefendantsThis Civil Suit has been filed under Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the O.S.Rules read with Order XXXIV Rule 7 of CPC, 1908, prayed for ajudgment and decree against the defendants:(a) For a declaration that the mortgage deed executed on 6.8.2009 andregistered as document No. 1640 of 2009 in the office of the Sub Registrar, Mylapore is illegal, invalid and no-nest in the eyes of law and not binding on the plaintiffs and the suit properties or in the alternate if this Hon'ble Court holds that ther...
Goriyambi vs Boyot Virappin(Died)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on : 13.08.2025Pronounced on : 29.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN S.A.No. 1254 of 2009 And M.P.No. 1 of 20091. Goriyambi2. Abdul Muthalif3. Sardar4. Shakila5. Zarina6. Refufy ... 3rd party in the suit/Respondents/Appellants Vs.1. Boyot Virappin (died)2. Boyot Krishnammal (died) wife of Boyot Virappin Rep. by her power agent Boyot Virappin3. Jancy4. Gracy Respondents 3 and 4 are legal heirs of Balu5. Kavitha Amarnath6. Suriya Krishnamurthy [ RR 5 7 6 are impleaded third party vide order of Court dated 16.10.2020 made in C.M.P.No. 15620/2017 in S.A.No. 1254/2009] ... 3rd party in the suit/ respondents 8 and 9 respondentsPRAYER: This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree in A.S.No. 319 of 2006 on the file of II Additional District Judge, Pondicherry and dated 12.08.2009 in reversing the judgment and decree in O.S.No. 315 of 1986 on the file of Principal Sub-...
K.S.Paramasivam vs S.S.Nachimuthu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 29.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN S.A.No.264 of 2009 K.S.Paramasivam ... Appellant Vs 1.S.S.Nachimuthu 2.K.S.Senthil Kumar 3.K.K.Seeranga Gounder ... Respondents S.A.No.265 of 2009 K.S.Paramasivam ... Appellant Vs 1.K.Thiagarajan 2.K.S.Senthil Kumar 3.S.S.Nachimuthu 4.K.K.Seeranga Gounder 5.State of Tamil Nadu rep.by its District Collector, Erode District, Erode - 11. 6.The Tahsildar Bhavani Taluk, Bhavani - 638 301. 7.The Director General of Police Chennai - 4.8.The Superintendent of Police, Erode District, Erode - 1. 9.The Inspector of Police (Law & Order) Bhavani Police Station, Bhavani Taluk, Erode District. 10.The Inspector of Police (Law & Order) Appakudai Police Station, Appakudai, Bhavani Taluk, Erode District. ... Respondents S.A.No.266 of 2009 K.S.Paramasiam ... Appellant Vs K.Thiagarajan ... Respondent Common Prayer: These Second Appeals have been filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedu...
Boologammal vs Lakshmana Pillai (Died)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.08.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI S.A No. 546 of 2006 & S.A No. 1170 of 2008 S.A No. 546 of 2006 : Boologammal ... Appellant Vs 1.Lakshmana Pillai 2.Chittibabu ...Respondents PRAYER in S.A No. 546 of 2006: This Second appeal has been filed under Section 100 CPC, against the judgment and decree of the Subordinate Judge, Kancheepuram in A.S No. 28 fo 2001 dated 30.04.2003 confirming thejudgment and decree in OS No. 841 of 1998 dated 17.11.2000.For Appellant :Mr.K.Kalyanaraman For Respondents:Mr.C.K. Chandrasekaran S.A No. 1170 of 2008: Krishnan ... Appellant Vs.1. Lakshmana Pillai(Died) 2.Ramu 3.Raja 4.Chittubabu 5.Kannan 6.Boologammal 7.Sankar 8.Mohan9. Usha10. V. Srinivasan 11.Muniyan 12.Prakash 13.Suresh 14.Sujatha 15.Rakha (R1 Died, R9 to R15 brought as legal heirs of the deceased R1 vide courtorder dated 02.03.2023 made in CMP No.3010 of 2023 in S.A No...Respondent PRAYER in S.A No. 1170 of 2008 : This Se...
K.Baskar vs Krishnaveni
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-08-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI AND CMP NO. 14214 OF 20251. K.BaskarS/o Krishnamurthy, No.104, O V Rd, Ambur, Vellore Dt, Employed And Presently Stationed Ast Alahli Bank Of Kuwait, Post Box 1387, Saat 13014, Kuwait. Appellant(s) Vs1. KRISHNAVENI Divorced W/o K.Baskar, No.18a, Bagalur Rd, Hosur Post, Hosur Tk, Krishnagiri Dt. Respondent(s)PRAYER To set aside the decree and judgment passed by the Principal District Court, Krishnagiri in CMA No. 14 of 2010 on 12.01.2011 in confirming the decree and judgment passed by the Subordinate Court, Hosur in MOP No. 6 of 2004 dated 18.01.2010. For Appellant(s): Mr. C. Jagadish For Respondent(s): No AppearanceJUDGEMENTChallenging the decree and judgment passed by the Principal District Court, Krishnagiri in CMA No. 14 of 2010 on 12.01.2011 in confirming the decree and judgment passed by the Subordinate Court, Hosur in MOP No. 6 of 2004 dated 18.01.2010 the appellant preferred...
S.Jayabalan vs the Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd.,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.08.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN S.Jayabalan : Petitionerversus1.The Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd., Karur Branch by its Authorised Officer, No.2/3, KMO Complex, 80 Feet Road, Karur, Tamil Nadu 639 002 2.M/s.Radha Weaving Factory, by its Proprietrix Radha, 57, Rathinam Street, Opp. To Amuda Cinema Theatre, Karur 639 002 3.A.Sukumaran : Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Recovery Inspector/ Recovery Officer or Debt Recovery Tribunal at Coimbatore to issue Sale Certificate in petitioner favour in consonance of the proceedings in DRC No.271/2002 dated 10.04.2006 now rest at Coimbatore DRT vide T.A.No.11 of 2023 within a stipulated time. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Sivakumar For Respondents : Mr.G.Govarthanan, for respondent No.1ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Ho...
Duraisamy vs Veeramuthu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-08-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI AND1. Duraisamy2. Vijayaraj Appellant(s) ..Vs..1. Veeramuthu2. Ranganayagam3. Jeyalakshmi Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): S.Arjun For Respondent(s): M/s. R. Nandhakumar, Counsel For Caveator VikramkumarR. KALAIMATHI, J.lbmORDERWhen the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the Appellant seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Second Appeal stating that the dispute between the appellants and respondents is settled out of Court. Accordingly, he has filed a memo enclosing the letter of the appellant.2. In view of the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed as settled out of Court. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. 29-08-2025 Index : Yes/NoSpeaking order /Non Speaking OrderNeutral Citation : Yes/No Lbm AND...
Suresh Kumar vs Vikram Jesudasan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on : 07.07.2025Pronounced on : 29.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN C.S.No.375 of 2005 1.Suresh Kumar 2.Rekha Jain 3.Chandan Kumar 4.Pramila Jain 5.Naresh Kumar 6.Varsha Jain ... Plaintiffs Vs 1.Vikram Jesudasen 2.Ajit Jesudasen 3.Ranjit Jesudasen 4.Tara Lindsay 5.Maya Kumarswami 6.Cecil Joseph 7.Tamara Lindsay Amended as per order dated 28.11.2017 in Appln. No.7814 of 2017 ... Defendants This Civil Suit has been filed under Order IV Rule 1 of O.S. Rules read with Order VII Rule I of CPC, prayed for a judgment and decree against the defendants:(a) Granting Specific Performance of sale of the schedule mentionedproperty in favour of the plaintiffs for a consideration of Rs.1.6/- crores and the additional sum of Rs.10 lakhs already paid, by ordering the defendants 1 to 5 to execute the sale deed and do all such acts as are necessary to transfer title of the schedule mentioned property in favour of the plaintiffs and up...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »