Chennai Court July 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V.M.Susiker Rao Vs Nandhini
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU IN OP NO. 144 OF 2025 V.M.Susiker Rao S/o.V.R.Mohan Rao, No.H-11, TNHB, Kolathur, Chennai - 600 099. Applicant(s) Vs Nandhini D/o.Prakasam, Plot No.74, Door No.12, Jaya Nagar Main Road, (behind Sub Treasury Office) Jaya Nagar, Tiruvallur - 602 001. Respondent(s) For Applicant(s):Mr.A.SARAVANAN For Respondent(s): No appearanceORDERThe present application has been filed for grant of an order of interim stay of all further proceedings in G.W.O.P.No.319 of 2024, pending on the file of the learned Principal District Judge at Tiruvallur, pending disposal of the above transfer O.P. 2.In view of the order passed in A.No.2059 of 2025, the present application stands closed. 31-07-2025 Gba (2/2)...
V.M.Susiker Rao Vs Nandhini
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU in O.P.No.144 of 2025 V.M.Susiker Rao S/o.V.R.Mohan Rao, No.H-11, TNHB, Kolathur, Chennai - 600 099. Applicant(s) Vs Nandhini D/o.Prakasam, Plot No.74, Door No.12, Jaya Nagar Main Road, (behind Sub Treasury Office) Jaya Nagar, Tiruvallur - 602 001. Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): Mr.A.SARAVANAN For Respondent(s): No appearanceORDERThe present application has been filed to withdraw the GWOP.No.319 of 2024 pending on the file of Principal District Court, Tiruvallur and transfer the same to the file of this Court to be tried along with the above captioned O.P. 2.In spite of service of notice on the respondent, the respondent had neither entered appearance through her counsel nor present before this Court. 3.A Memo had also been filed before the Principal District Court, Tiruvallur, where G.W.O.P.No.319 of 2024 is pending and is sought to be transferred to the file of this Court. Hence,...
Jayam Traders vs P.Anbazhagan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-31-2025
Crl.O.P.No.21565 of 2025 in Crl.A.SR. No.23857 of 2024 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J Leave granted. 31.07.2025 bkn Note : Registry is directed to number the Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order. 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
R.Dharani Manikandan Vs S.Manikandan,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 31.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHAR.Dharani Manikandan ... Petitioner Vs. S.Manikandan (H.R.Manager) The Management of NVH India Auto Parts Private Limited Plot No.B.68, SIPCOT Industrial Park Irungattukottai, Sriperumbudur Kanchipuram District. ... Respondent Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for his wilful disobedience of the order dated 27.11.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.15575 of 2018. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sudalai Kannu For Respondent : No appearanceORDERThe petitioner herein seeks to enforce the order passed in W.P.No.15575 of 2018, in and by which, the order dated 10.07.2017 passed by the I Additional Labour Court, Chennai, in I.D.No.777/2015, was confirmed.2. The Labour Court in its order, had directed the Management toreinstate the petitioner with continuity of service and to pay 50% backwages along with other attendant benefits. ...
D. Kamalakannan vs Y.R. Savithri
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
C.M.A.No.1134 of 2024T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.This matter is taken up for hearing under the caption For Being Mentioned today at the instance of the learned counsel for the appellant.2. As nothing survives for making any modification in thejudgment of this court dated30.07.2025, there is no need for any modification. 18.08.2025 rpp...
The Management Vs G.Francis Raja
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL W.P. No.150 of 2022 and W.P. No.20000 of 2023 and W.M.P. Nos.174 of 2022 and 19349 of 2023 The Management, M/s. Micro Electric Controls, Old No.9/174, New No.170, Railway Station Road, Periyanaickenpalayam, Coimbatore - 641 020. represented by its Proprietor, G.R. Jaganathan .. Petitioner [common in both W.Ps.] vs. G. Francis Raja S/o. K. George .. Respondent[common in both W.Ps.] PRAYER in W.P. No.150 of 2022: The Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records and quash the order dated 02.11.2021 passed in C.P. No.52 of 2010 passed by the Principal Labour Court, Coimabtore.PRAYER in W.P. No.20000 of 2023: The Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records and quash the order dated 05.05.2023 passed in C.P. No.57 of 2021 pass...
S.Logesh vs B.Kriubakaran
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 29.08.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI S.Logesh ...Appellant Vs. 1.B.Kriubakaran 2.The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Motor Third Party Claims Hub, Oriental House, 2nd Floor, Old No.115, New No.216, Prakasam Salai, Broadway, Chennai 600 104. ...Respondents Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the order made in M.C.O.P.No.1002 of 2018, dated 07.11.2024, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (In the IV Court of Small Causes, Chennai). For Appellant : Mr.K.Balaji For Respondent : R1 No appearance Mr.J.Chandran for R2ORDERToday, the matter is listed under the caption "for being mentioned", at the instance of the learned counsel for the appellant. 2.It is brought to the notice of this Court that some typographical error has been crept in Paragraph No.12,13 and 14 of the Order dated 30.07.2025. The said Paragraph No.12,13 and 14 are to b...
Texmo Industries vs Techmo Industries
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY Texmo Industries, Coimbatore 29, Represented by its Partner, Damayanti Ramachandran ... Plaintiff -vs- Tecmo Industries, Coimbatore 6, Represented by its Partner K.Vellingiri ... Defendant PRAYER: Civil Suit filed under Order VII Rule 1 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 And Order IV Rule 1 of O.S.Rules, 1956 Read With Sections 28, 29, 105 and 106 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958, praying to grant a judgment and decree on the following terms:-(i) Restraining by means of permanent injunction the defendant, its agents, servants, dealers or others claiming through or under the defendant from manufacturing, selling and / or offering for sale any goods in class 9 ofSchedule IV of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Rules 1959 bearing TECHMO and TECMO trade marks, or any other trade marks which is identical with, or similar to, the plaintiff's registered trade marks Nos.3150...
Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs SMRC Automotive Holding Netherlands B.V.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.07.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Commissioner Of Income Tax Chennai- 600 034 : Appellant Vs M/s.SMRC Automotive Holding Netherlands B.V. C/o.SRMC Automotive Products India Ltd Plot No.G 34, Survey No.15 Pt 16Pt Siocot Incdustiral Park Vallam Vadagal A Village Kanchipuram 602 105 PAN AAHCR 3869C : Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras D Bench, Chennai, dated 22.12.2023 in IT(TP)A.No.53/CHNY/2021. For Appellant : Mr.R.Karthik For Respondent : Mr.N.V.NarayananJUDGMENT(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Learned counsel for the Revenue fairly conceded today that the monetary limit involved in this appeal is below the monetary limit prescribed in Circular No.09/2024, dated 17.09.2024, issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Government of India...
Ceat Financial Services Ltd., vs 1.Ashok Kumar Goel,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.07.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSECeat Financial Services Limited ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Ashok Kumar Goel 2.Sri Rama Machinery Corporation Limited ... Respondents Prayer: Original Petition is filed under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to appoint an Arbitrator on behalf of the Respondents in respect of the Petitioner's claim for amounts due and for the vehicle TN-01-J- 4752 under Hire Purchase Agreeement No.03-07-0009-95/96 dated 19.05.95. For Petitioner : No appearanceORDERThis Original Petition is of the year 2000.2. On the last hearing date, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought time to verify as to whether anything survives for adjudication in this Original Petition.ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.arb3. Today, when this matter is taken up, there is no representation on theside of the petitioner. It can be now inferred that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing with the remedy in...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »