Chennai Court July 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Thilaga vs Mangalam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI and C.M.P.Nos.19276 and 26308 of 20231. Thilaga2. Tamilarasi ...Appellants / Defendants 2 and 3 Vs.1. Mangalam ...1st Respondent / Plaintiff2. Kolanji ... 2nd Respondent / 1st Defendant3. Pichaiammal ...3rd Respondent / 4th DefendantPRAYER:- This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to set aside the decree and judgment dated 14.12.2022 in A.S.No.31 of 2018 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Ariyalur and reversing the decree and judgment dated 05.09.2018 in O.S.No.112 of 2007 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Ariyalur. For Appellants : Mr.K.Shakespeare For R1 : Mr.P.Valliyappan Senior Counsel for M/s.P.V.Law Associates For R2 & R3 : No appearanceJUDGMENTAggrieved by the judgment dated 14.12.2022 passed in A.S.No.31 of 2018 by the Principal District Court, Ariyalur, the defendants no.2 and 3 Thilaga W/o Kolanji and her daughter Ta...
G.Dhanasekaran Vs The Joint Commissioner of Labour
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 31.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA and WMP.No.10706 of 2023 G.Dhanasekaran ... Petitioner Vs.1.The Joint Commissioner of Labour (Commissioner under Employees Compensation Act), O/o. The Joint Commissioner of Labour, Integrated Labour Department offices Building, Bangalore Road, Abdullapuram, I.T.I. Campus, Melmanavoor, Vellore 632 010 2.Valli 3.Minor Varalakshmi 4.Minor Tamizharasi, 5.Minor . Praveena 6.Minor Praveen [R.3 to R.6 rep. by her mother/next friend Mrs.Valli, the 2nd respondent] 7.Bakthan 8.Muniyammal 9.The ManagerUnited India Insurance Company Ltd., 3rd Party Hub office, No. 81, T.K.M. Complex, Katpadi Road, Vellore 4 ...Respondents Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorari, call for the records pertaining toorder of the 1st respondent dated 09.11.2022 made in E.C.I.A. No. 28 of2018 and quash the same in the interest of justice. Fo...
K.Durai vs the State by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31.07.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN in Crl.A.Nos.501 & 500 of 2024 1.K.Durai 2.V.Mari ... Petitioners/A1 & A2 in both Crl.M.Ps Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police, Ponnur Police Station, Thiruvannamalai (Crime No.53 of 2012) ... Respondent in both Crl.M.Ps PRAYER in Crl.M.P.No.7417 of 2024: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 389(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, seeking to suspend the sentence passed against the appellant in the above case in Court, Arani, pending disposal of the above Criminal Appeal and release him on bail. PRAYER in Crl.M.P.No.7486 of 2024: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 389(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, seeking to suspend the sentence passed against the appellant in the above case in Court, Arani, pending disposal of the above Criminal Appeal and release him on bail. In both Crl.M.Ps Fo...
Kanagaraj vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31.07.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Kanagaraj : Petitionerversus1.The District Collector, 2.The Tahsildar, 3.The Assistant Director (Panchayat) 4.The Block Development Officer Thirukazhukundram, Chengalpattu District 5.Sengeni : Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 1 to 3 to remove the illegal encroachment made by the 4th respondent in respect of the property situated at Chengalpattu DistrictThirukazhukundram Taluk, Manamai Village, in Survey No.235/1B to an extent of 0.01.50, 235/2B to an extent of 0.02.00 in Survey No. extent of 0.06.00 Hectares in Survey No.245/2A to an extent of 0.15.00 Hectares in Survey No.245/2B to an extent of 0.04.00 Hectares in Survey No.245/2C1 to an extent of 0.06.50 Hectares and in Survey No.245/3 to an extent of 0.43.00 Hec...
M s Sundaram Finance Ltd Vs M Mariyal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-31-2025
Arbitration Application No.503 of 2025 M/s.Sundaram Finance Ltd., Chennai. .. Applicant Vs. 1.M.Mariyal 2.M.Raja .. Respondents As seen from the affidavit of service enclosing the returned cover, notice sent to the respondents has been returned with an endorsement unclaimed, which amounts to deemed service. Hence, the respondents are set exparte by this Court.2. The Advocate Commissioner appointed by this Court has already repossessed the vehicle and handed over the custody of the same to the applicant.3. Since the prayer sought for in this application has already been achieved, nothing survives for further adjudication in this application. Accordingly, this application is closed. rkm rkm Arb.Appln. No.503 of 2025...
Christian Literature Society Vs M/s.Churchs Auxiliary for Social Actio ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 31.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU M/s.Christian Literature Society Rep.by its General Secretary Dr.Y.Pammeleena No.68, Evening Bazaar Road, Part Town, Chennai 600 003. Plaintiff vs. 1.M/s.Church's Auxiliary for Social Action (CASA) Rep.by its Director (New Delhi) Rachana Building, 4th Floor, No.2, Rajendra Place, Pusa Road, New Delhi 110 008. 2.The Chief Zonal Officer, M/s.Church's Auxiliary for Social Action (CASA) No.165, Broadway, 3rd Floor, A.L.C. Campus, Chennai 600 108. ...Defendants PRAYER: Plaint filed under ORDER IV Rule 1 of O.S. Rules, read withOrder VII Rule 1 of C.P.C., prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased topass a judgment and decree against the Defendants: a. Directing Defendants to pay Rs.2,57,54,415/- together with subsequent interest @ 12% per annum to the plaintiff from the date of plaint till the date of realization. b. Award the cost of the suit and c. Pass such other a...
Subramaniyan vs S.Shanthi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated :31.07.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI C.R.P.No.2643 of 2025 Subramaniyam ... Petitioner vs S.Shanthi .. Respondent Revision filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India directing Subordinate Court, Rasipuram, Namakkal District to dispose of H.M.O.P.No.139 of 2024 For Petitioner : Mr.L.RajendranORDERConsidering the limited prayer sought for by the petitioner, notice to the respondent is dispensed with.2. Despite the order of this Court dated 15.07.2025 requiring theSubordinate Court, Rasipuram to indicate the time that is required to dispose of HMOP No.139 of 2024, there has been no report received by the Registry till date.P.B.BALAJI.,J.sr3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that originally the petitionwas filed in the year 2021 and subsequently, re-numbered as HMOP No.139 of 2024 and the petitioner has sought for dissolution of marriage with the respondent/wife and the petition is pending for more than...
P.G.Arumugam vs Rajammal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-31-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 06.08.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL and CMP.No. 14226 of 2021 --- 1.P.G.Arumugam 2.R.Shanthi AppellantsVersus1.Rajammal 2.Mangammal 3.K.Ramakrishnan ... Respondents Prayer: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 read with Order XLI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 praying to set aside the Judgment and Decree made in O.S.No.134 of 2014 on February 12, 2020 passed by I Additional District Judge, Tiruvallur. For Appellants : Mr.V.Manisekaran For Respondents-1&2 : Mr.Vishal For Mr.K.Balaji ----JUDGMENTThis matter is listed today under the caption for being mentioned at the instance of the learned Counsel for the appellants.2.Mr.V.Manisekaran, learned Counsel on record for the appellants and Mr.Vishal, representing Mr.K.Balaji, learned Counsel on record for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are before this Court. 3.Mr.V.Manisekaran, learned Counsel appearing for the appellants submits that he has inadvertently made an endorse...
Sheik Hussain Sayab vs Ramamurthy (Died) Natarajan (Died) 1.Veeraragha ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-31-2025
This application has been filed by the appellants seeking to implead the District Collector, Villupuram along with the Revenue Tahsildar, Melmalayanur Taluk, Villupuram District as further respondents in the Second Appeal.2. The presence of the proposed respondents is required, since even inthe plaint, the property is described as Government Poramboke land. Therefore, to determine the nature of the land as on date, the said respondents would be of much assistance to this Court.3. Hence, this application is allowed. Necessary records are served inthe office of the Government Pleader. The Registry to carry out the necessary amendment by impleading the District Collector, Villupuram and the Revenue Tahsildar, Melmalayanur Taluk, Villupuram District as respondents 17 and 18 in the Second Appeal. gsk gsk...
Additional Commissioner and Regional Director, Vs M/s.Sam Turbo Indust ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-31-2025
in This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 71 days in filing the above CMA.SR.No.45393 of 2025.2. Mr.R.Jayaprakash takes notice for the respondent.3. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant(s) and perused the material available in the record.4. On being satisfied with the averments stated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition, and finding the reason assigned by the petitioner(s) to be justifiable. Therefore, the delay in filling CMA.SR.No.45393 of 2025 is condoned.5. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous petition is allowed.6. Registry is directed to list the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order. smn smn in...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »