Chennai Court May 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S2B Power Systems and Controls Vs Macsoft Automations
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-22-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22.05.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN C.M.P.No.10993 of 2025 1.M/s.S2B Power Systems & Controls, rep. by its Proprietor Subburam, 2.Subburam, Proprietor M/s.S2B Power Systems & Controls, Petitioners Vs M/s.Macsoft Automations, Partnership Firm rep. by it Managing Parter H.Venkatkumar, S/o.Hariraj, Office at No.1, Bharath Nagar, Neelikonampalayam, Coimbatore-641 033. Respondent PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 377 days in preferring the appeal suit against the decree and judgment dated 24.1.2024 in C.O.S.No.126 of 2023 on the file of Commercial Court (District Judge Cadre), Coimbatore. For Petitioners: Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram For Respondent: Mr.R.Amardeep for M/s.Tamizh Law FirmORDER(Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan, J.) This petition is filed to condone the delay of 377 days in filing the appea...
BHUVANESH Vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-22-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22.05.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR CRL MP NO. 8878 of 2025 Bhuvanesh ...... Petitioner Vs State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Chennai. ........ Respondent For Petitioner : Ms.R.Thulasi For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition that ''the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 p.m. until further orders, imposed by this Court in Crl. O.P. No.9261 of 2025 dated 28.03.2024.2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioners have been regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court.N.SENTHILKUMAR,J.Vv3. Considering the submissions of both sides and the nature of theoffence, the condition in Paragraph No.6(b) that ''the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 p.m. until further orders imposed in Crl.O.P.No.9261 of 2025 dated 28....
The Dadabadi Sri Jin vs Vikas Bhurat Jain
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved On 27.03.2025Pronounced on 21.05.2025CORAM:`THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR C.R.P. No.631 of 2021 and C.M.P. No.5394 of 2021 The Dadabadi Sri Jin Kushalsuriji Jin Chandrasuriji Trust Rep. by its Trustee Mr.Ashok Kumar Jain No.370, Konnur High Road Chennai - 600 023 ... Petitioner Vs 1.Vikas Bhurat Jain 2.The Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment No.119, Utamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakka Chennai 34 3.The District Collector Singaravelar Maligai Rajaji Salai, Chennai 1 4.The Sub Collector, Tondiarpet Chennai 81 Page 1/22 5.The Tahsildar, Perambur Tk, Chennai 236.Shree Chandraprabhu Maharaj Juna Jain Mandhir Trust (Regd) Rep by its Secretary No.345, Mint Street, Chennai 79. (Respondents 2 to 6 impleaded vide court order dated 08.08.2024 made in CM No.13830 of 2022 in CRP No.631 of 2021) ... Respondents Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fai...
Yasodha Vs Sri Kaliappa Trust
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved On 21.03.2025Pronounced on 21.05.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR C.R.P. No.1187 of 2022 and C.M.P. No.6313 of 2022 Yasodha ... Petitioner Vs 1.M/s.Sri Kaliappa Trust Rep. by its Chairman Sri T.Jaganathan No.13, East Sambandam Road R.S.Puram, Coimbatore - 641 002 2.Mrs.T.Radha 3.T.Jaganathan 4.T.Gowrishankar 5.K.R.Jayaraman ... Respondents Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order passed in I.A. No.2 of 2020 in Trust O.P. No.112 of 2020 dated 26.03.2021 by the learned Principal District Judge, Coimbatore. Page 1/9 For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sankarasubbu for Mr.R.Ganesh Babu For Respondents : Ms.R.Mahamandra RajalakshmiORDERThe present civil revision petition is filed challenging the order passed in I.A. No.2 of 2020 in Trust O.P. No.112 of 2020 dated 26.03.2021 by the learned Principal District Judge, Coimbatore.2. The revision petitioner had origi...
The Adhoc Committee vs S.Rasool Ahmed
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS[Reserved on : 21.03.2025][Pronounced on : 21 .05.2025]CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR and C.M.P.No.12461 of 2021 The Adhoc Committee Ondipudursunnathjamath Pallivasal And Khabarasthan waqf, Trichy Salai, Ondipudur, Coimbatore. Petitioner in CRP.1604/2021 Vs 1.S.Rasool Ahmed2. Tamil Nadu Waqf Board Rep. by its Chairman Villalseethakathi Nagar Chennai 1.3. The Chief Executive Officer Tamil Nadu Waqf Board Vallal Seethakathi Nagar Chennai 1 Respondents in CRP.1604/2021S.Rasul Ahmed ... Petitioner in CRP.603/2022 Vs. 1.Tamil Nadu Waqf Board Rep. by its Chairman Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai - 1 2.The Chief Executive Officer Tamil Nadu Waqf Board Vallal Seethakathi Nagar Chennai - 1 3.The Adhoc Committee Ondipudur Sunnath Jamath Pallivasal And Khabarasthan Waqf, Trichy Salai, Ondipudur Coimbatore District ... Respondents in CRP.603 of 2022 Prayer in C.R.P.No.1604 of 2021: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Co...
M.Manoharan vs K.Ramachandran
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-21-2025
in Crl.R.C.No.617 of 2025 N.SENTHILKUMAR.J, Today, this matter is listed under the caption For Being Mentioned at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, this Court, vide orderdated 21.05.2025 allowed the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition by suspending the sentence imposed on the petitioner. He submitted that in Paragraph 7(i) of the said order, it is mentioned that the petitioner shall surrender before the trial Court. Since the petitioner is still in the custody, the question of surrender does not arise, which requires to be modified. Further, he submitted that the name of the counsel for the petitioner may be substituted as Mr.R.Anburaj for Mr.R.Sudhakar.3. On consideration of the submission made by the learned counsel for thepetitioner, paragraph 7 and 7(i) of the earlier order of this Court dated 21.05.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.10084 of 2025 in Crl.R.C.No.617 of 2025, shall be deleted and stand substituted as follo...
M.Manoharan vs R.Jaisankar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-21-2025
in Crl.R.C.No.616 of 2025 N.SENTHILKUMAR.J, Today, this matter is listed under the caption For Being Mentioned at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, this Court, vide orderdated 21.05.2025 allowed the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition by suspending the sentence imposed on the petitioner. He submitted that in Paragraph 7(i) of the said order, it is mentioned that the petitioner shall surrender before the trial Court. Since the petitioner is still in the custody, the question of surrender does not arise, which requires to be modified. Further, he submitted that the name of the counsel for the petitioner may be substituted as Mr.R.Anburaj for Mr.R.Sudhakar.3. On consideration of the submission made by the learned counsel for thepetitioner, paragraph 7 and 7(i) of the earlier order of this Court dated 21.05.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.10083 of 2025 in Crl.R.C.No.616 of 2025, shall be deleted and stand substituted as follo...
Y.Padmaja Das vs the Additional Chief Secretary,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 21.05.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.R. SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN Y. Padmaja Das Petitioner vs.1. The Additional Chief Secretary Government of Tamil Nadu Home, Prohibition and Excise Department2. The Commissioner of Police Avadi City Avadi Chennai 600 0543. The Superintendent of Police Central Prison Puzhal Chennai 600 0664. The Inspector of PoliceCyber Crime Wing Avadi Police Commissionerate Ambattur Chennai 600 053 Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of habeas corpus to call for the records of the detention Page Nos.1/6order dated 31.01.2025 passed by the second respondent videNo.09/BCDFGISSSV/2025 and quash the same as illegal and direct the respondents to produce the detenu/body of the petitioner's son Bijoy Y.Das, aged 32 years, S/o Yatheendra Das, now confined at the Central Prison, Puzhal Chennai, before this Court and set hi...
Ruby Thomas vs K.Ashok Chakravarthy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved On 17.04.2025Pronounced on 21.05.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR C.R.P. No.1471 of 2019 and C.M.P. Nos.9609 of 2019, 17070 & 17073 of 2021 Ruby Thomas Prop. Deepa Gas Agencies No.93, Gangadeeswarar Koil Street Purasawalkam Chennai - 600 084 ... Petitioner Vs K.Ashok Chakravarthy ... Respondent Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Rent & Control) Act, 1960, to set aside the order dated 11.03.2019 made in M.P. No.331 of 2015 in R.C.A. No.456 of 2015 on the file of VIII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.Samir Kumar Shah for M/s.Shah & Shah For Respondent : Mr.S.A.Rajan Page 1/9ORDERThe present civil revision petition is filed by the tenant against whom anorder was passed in M.P. No.331 of 2015 in R.C.A. No.456 of 2015 [filed asagainst RCOP No.2338 of 2013] by the learned VIII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai.2. The landlord has ...
TAMILARASAN Vs State Rep.by, Station House Officer,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-21-2025
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21.05.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN in CRL.A.No.340 of 2025 1.Tamilarasan 2.Ramalingam ...Petitioners Vs. State Rep. by: Station House Officer, Vadalur Police Station, Cuddalore District. Crime No.49/2019 ... RespondentPrayer: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail by suspending the sentence imposed in S.C.No.315 of 2019 dated 07.03.2025 on the file of the I Additional District and Sessions Court, Cuddalore pending disposal of Criminal Appeal. For Petitioners : Mr.T.Muruganantham For Respondent : Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor ******Page No.1/6ORDER(Order of the Court was made by G.R.SWAMINATHAM, J.) Heard both sides.2. The petitioners are figuring as accused Nos.3 and 4 inS.C.No.315 of 2019 on the file of the I Additional District and Sessions Court, Cuddalore. They were convicted by t...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »