Chennai Court May 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.Sivaraj Vs The District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-22-2025
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22.05.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN and1. K. Sivaraj2. K. Arjunan ...Petitioners Vs. Chennai. ...RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from the lands in S.F. No.451, in Mylampadi Village, Bhavani Taluk, Erode District, except under due process of law. For Petitioners : Mr.Elizabeth Ravi For Respondents : Mr. M. Habeeb Rahman Govt. Advocate for R1 to R4 Mr. Babu Muthumeeran Standing Counsel for R5ORDERW.M.P. No.9166 of 2019 is ordered as prayed for. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and she has addressed a letter to the Registry in the above regard.2. Recording the aforesaid letter, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, W.M.P. No.9171 of 2019 is closed. Internet:Yes/No Index...
Gremaltes Referral Hospital vs the Registrar of Societies
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-22-2025
2025:MHC:1194IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASORDERS RESERVED ON: 08.04.2025 ORDERS PRONOUNCED ON: 22.05.2025CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P.Nos.8475, 8478, 8480 & 8481, 12024, 27787 of 2024 & 2802 of 2025 1.Gremaltes Referral Hospital & Leprosy Centre Rep.by its Director / Ex-officio Secretary A.Marianathan 2.A.Marianathan 3.Jacob Mathew 4.Rev.Dr.Kurian Thomas 5.Baby Joseph 6.Dhas GK .. Petitioners Vs. 1.The Registrar of Societies District Registrar Office Chennai Central No.182, Bharathi Salai, Royapettah Chennai 600 014. 2.D.Mahesh 3.Commissioner of Police No.132, EVK Sampath Road, VeperyChennai 600 007. 4.Durai Assistant Commissioner Kilpauk G-3 Police Station 36, HX, SH 114, Sastrinagar Chetpet, Chennai 600 031. 5.J.Ravichandran 6.C.Chidambaram 7.Dr.Thomas Abraham 8.G.R.Srinivasan 9.Esther Beulah Devakumari 10.T.Jayaraj Devadas 11.Thomas Philip .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitut...
M/s.Reha Environ Private Limited Vs Dr.Sharat Chauhan, I.A.S.,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-22-2025
2025:MHC:1195IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASOrders reserved on: 29.04.2025 Orders pronounced on : 22.05.2025CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY In Cont.P.No.3821 of 2024 :-1. M/s.Reha Environ Private Limited,Formerly known as M/s.Kivar Environ Private Limited, Represented by its Director, Having its Registered Office at No.18 C, 1st Main HSR Layout Sector-6, Hosur Sarjapur Road, HSR Layout (Near Silk Board), Banglore - 560 034.2. Puducherry Municipal Services Private Limited, Represented by its Director, No.1, Hari Plaza, 8th Cross Street, Anna Nagar, Puducherry - 605 001. .. PetitionersVersus1. Dr.Sharat Chauhan, I.A.S., Chief Secretary of Government of Puducherry, II Floor, Chief Secretariat, Gubert Avenue, Puducherry - 605 001.2. S.Shakthyvel, Director, Local Administration Department, Puducherry, No.2, Eveche Street, Puducherry - 605 001.3. "POMS" Comprising of S.Sivakumar, The Commissioner, Puducherry Municipality, No.1 Dumas Street, Pud...
Velaye Lor vs Union of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-22-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22.05.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.R. SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN W.P.No.11750 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos.13291 and 13293 of 2025 1.Velaye Lor 2.P.Murugan 3.Koperundevi 4.Dineshkar Petitioners vs.1. Union of India rep. byThe District Magistrate-cum-District Collector O/o.The District Collector 1st Floor, New Collectorate Building Vazudavoor Road, Pettaiyanchathiram Puducherry 605 0092. The Tahsildar Department of Revenue and Disaster Management Taluk Office, Puducherry RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to issue S.C. Origin Certificate to the petitioners 3 and 4 on the basis of the community status of the 1st petitioner. Page Nos.1/6 For petitioners Mr. M. Gnanasekar For respondents Mr. V. Vasantha Kumar Addl. Govt. Pleader (Puducherry)ORDER(made by G.R. SWAMINATHAN, J.) Heard both sides.2. This writ peti...
M/S.Global Infra Solutions vs Union of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-22-2025
2025:MHC:1204IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASORDERS RESERVED ON : 22.04.2025 ORDERS PRONOUNCED ON : 22.05.2025CORAMTHE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P.Nos.12523 & 12524 of 20251. M/s.Global Infra Solutions, F-2, E-8/11A, Sukhsagar Apartment, Trilanga, Bhopal 462 039. Madhya Pradesh, Though its sole Proprietor, Mr.Sandeep Singh2. Dhruv Consultancy Services Limited, 501, Pulkit Plaza, C.B.D.Belapur, Navi Mumbai 400 614, Through its Authorized Representative, Mr.Sandeep Singh.3. M/s.MS Consultant, E-8/11A, Sukhsagar Apartment, Trilanga, Bhopal 462 039. Madhya Pradesh, Though its Partner, Mr.Sandeep Singh .. Petitioner/versus/1. Union of India, Through the Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, Transport Bhawan, 1, Parliament Street, New Delhi - 110 001.2. National Highway Authority of India,O/o. Regional Officer, Chennai Region, 5 Floor, CMRL Building, th Poonamallee High Road, Koyembedu, Chennai 600 107. Also at: Corporate Office, G-5 &...
Sathish Kumar vs R.Ramakrishnan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-22-2025
W.M.P. No.15771 of 2025 in W.P.No.39146 of 2025 W.M.P. No.15771 of 2025 in W.P.No.39146 of 2024 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY. J.,Considering the nature of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this miscellaneous petition, as well as those in the counter affidavit filed by the 1st respondent, and taking into account the complaint made by the petitioner/proposed respondent, it is evident that the petitioner/proposed respondent is a proper party to the Writ Petition. The petitioner/proposedrespondent has also brought to light certain factsthrough his affidavit and has filed relevant documents. Therefore, the miscellaneous petition seeking to implead the petitioner/proposed respondent as the 5th respondent is allowed.2. The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment in the cause title accordingly. .05.2025 Jer Page No.1 of 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Coimbatore District Football Associaiton, vs Tamilnadu Football Associ ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-22-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22.05.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN W.P.No.11744 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.12824 & 43124 of 2024 Coimbatore District Football Association Rep. by its President, Dr.Ajeet Kumar Lal Mohan, Gate No.12, 1st Floor, Nehru Stadium, Coimbatore 641 018. .. Petitioner Vs.1. The Tamil Nadu Football Association, Rep. by its Administrative Committee, 73, Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium, Park Town, Chennai 600 003. 2.The Union of India Rep. by the Secretary, Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, Department of Sports, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi 110 115. 3.All India Football Federation Rep. by its General Secretary, Football House, Sector 19, Phase 1, Dwarka, New Delhi 110 075.4.Sports Development Authority of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary, No.116 A, Periyar EVR High Road Nehru Park, Chennai 600 084. 5.Dr.Madan. A. Sendhil Rathinam College Sports Club 6.Rajendran Coimbatore Public ...
Manikanta K vs the Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-22-2025
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22.05.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN1. K. Manikanta2. Surendra Reddy Chillakuru ...Petitioners Vs. Chennai. ...RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the second and third respondents to permit the first and second petitioners continue in studying BE (ECE) & BE (CSE) respectively in second and third respondent college from April 2025 for this present academic year.For Petitioners : Mr.P. Suresh Kumar For Respondents : Mr.S. Rajesh, Government Advocate for R1 Mr.L. Baskaran for Govt. Advocate for R4 (Crl. Side) Not ready in notice reg R2 and R3.ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has addressed a letter to the Registry in the above regard.2. Recording the aforesaid letter, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Internet:Yes/No I...
Kamaraj and Palani vs the Revenue Tahsidlar-Cum-
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-22-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-05-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN AND WMP NO. 18570 OF 2025 Kamaraj @ Palani S/o.Ramasamy, No.135/112, South Street, Ulagalapadi Village, Vanapuram Taluk, Kallakurichi District. Petitioner(s) Vs The Revenue Tahsidlar-cum- Taluk Executive Magistrate, Vanapuram Taluk, Kallakurichi District Respondent(s)PRAYER:This petition has been filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings dated 26.03.2025, having reference no.Na.Ka.A3/1074/2025 issued by the respondent herein in respect of the petitioner's land comprised in Survey no.110/3, situated at Ulagalapadi Village, Vanapuram Taluk, Kallakurichi District, and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): M/s.R.Bharath Kumar R.Divyapreathika A.AmbedkarK.Rajkumar U.Ramya For Respondent(s): Ms.R.Anitha, AGPORDER(Order ...
BASUL RAHMAN Vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: May-22-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 22.05.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR in Crl.OP.No.9039 of 2025 Basul Rahman ... Petitioner Vs. State represented by, The Inspector of Police, (Cr.No.180 of 2025) ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.D.Gopikrishnan For Respondent : Mr.V.J.Priyadarsana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed upon the petitioner in Crl.OP.No.9039 of 2025 dated 28.03.2024, passed by this Court to report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has been regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court.3. Considering the said submission, the condition imposed by thisCourt in Crl.OP.No.9039of 2025 dated 28.03.2025, is modified to the effect that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police once in a month i.e., on the 1st working day of every month at 10.30 a...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »