Skip to content

Chennai Court May 2025 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

May 28 2025

Syed Ahamed(Died) and Others vs Shoukat Ali

Court: Chennai

Decided on: May-28-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.05.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI Syed Ahamed (Died) 2)Rahman Beevi 3)Kamal Basha 4)Salim Basha 5)Hajiran Beevi 6)Safeena Banu (appellants 2 to 6 are brought on record as LR's of the deceased sole appellant vide order of this Court dated 19/08/2024 made in CMP.Nos.10406, 10407 & 10414/2022 in S.A.No.1068 of 2012) ... Appellant/Plaintiff Vs. Shoukat Ali ... Respondent/Defendant Prayer: This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Perambalur dated 31.07.2012 in A.S.No.2 of 2012 confirming the judgment and decree of the learned District Munsif, Perambalur dated 27.11.2011 in I.A.No.463 of 2009 in O.S.No.150 of 2009. For Appellants : Mr.T.M.Hariharan For Respondent : Mr.Valliappan Senior Counsel for Mr.S.Shriram NarayananJUDGMENTAggrieved by the findings given in A.S.No.2 of 2012 on the file of the Subor...


May 28 2025

R.Kuppusamy vs K.Pushpana Gounder

Court: Chennai

Decided on: May-28-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.05.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI R.Kuppusamy ...Appellant/ 1st Appellant/2nd Plaintiff Vs. 1.K.Pushpana Gounder 2.C.Nallamal 3.C.Damodhara Gounder 4.C.Pappathi 5.R.Mani ...Respondents/Respondents/ Defendants 6.P.Lakshmi .. 3rd Plaintiff/2nd Appellants/6th Respondent Prayer: This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against thejudgment and decree dated 20.10.2005 made in A.S.No.52 of 2005 on thefile of the I Additional Subordinate Court, Erode, confirming the judgmentand decree dated 12.01.2005 passed in O.S.No.622 of 2000 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif Court, Erode. For Appellant : Mr.S.Rajendrakumar for M/s.Suresh Associates For Respondents : No AppearanceJUDGMENTBeing aggrieved by the concurrent findings of the order of dismissal dated 12.01.2005 made in O.S.No.622 of 2000 by the II Additional District Munsif Court, Erode and the judgment and decree dated 20.10.2005 made in A.S.No....


May 28 2025

M/S.Chaalaka Development and Reality Pvt. Ltd vs Sameera Estates Priva ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: May-28-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON: 01.04.2025PRONOUNCED ON: 28.05.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA and CMP.Nos.5528 & 5522 of 2025C.R.P.No.957 of 2025 : 1.M/s.Chaalaka Development & Reality Pvt. Ltd., Represented by its Authorised Signatory Mr.K.B.Nagraj, S/o. Kuruba Chinna Thimappa Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021 And having its Office at : III Floor, Executive Office, Hotel Sahara Star Vile Parle Mumbai, Maharashtra 400 021 Represented by its Authorised Signatory Mr.Dwaraknath Govind Presently : 9th Floor, 97-98 Atlanta Building Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021. 2.M/s.Chaarvi Reality &Development Pvt. Ltd., Represented by its Authorised Signatory Mr.K.B.Nagraj, S/o. Kuruba Chinna Thimappa Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021And having its Office at : III Floor, Executive Office, Hotel Sahara Star Vile Parle Mumbai, Maharashtra 400 021 Represented by its Authorised Signatory Mr.Dwaraknath Govind Presently : 9th Floor, 97-98 Atlanta Buildi...


May 28 2025

G.Ayyarappan vs a/M Arunachaleswarar

Court: Chennai

Decided on: May-28-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.05.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI and M.P.No.1 of 2013 1.G.Ayyarappan 2.G.Munuswamy 3.G.Kannappan 4.G.M.Devaki ... Appellants/Respondents 3-6/Impleaded Defendants 3-6 Vs. 1.A/m.Arunachaleswarar Thirukoil Having its Office at the Thirukoil premises At: Thiruvannamalai and represented by its Deputy Commissioner/Executive Officer ... 1st Respondent/6th Appellant/Plaintiff 2.Ashok Sen ... 2nd Respondent/1st Respondent/1st Defendant Prayer: This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against thejudgment and decree dated 12.09.2012 made in A.S.No.232 of 2009 on thefile of the IV Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, reversing the judgmentand decree dated 01.08.2008 passed in O.S.No.3326 of 2001 on the file of the Vth Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai. For Appellants : Mr.A.Thiagarajan, Senior Counsel Assisted by Ms.L.Sweety for Mr.S.Ramesh Kumar For R1 : Ms.P.A.Samyuktha for M/s.A.S.Kailasam Associates For R...


May 28 2025

T.Senguttuvan Vs Ashokkumar. K

Court: Chennai

Decided on: May-28-2025

2025:MHC:1271IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON : 02.09.2024PRONOUNCED ON : 28.05.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA E.L.P.No.9 of 2021 T.Senguttuvan Petitioner Vs 1.Ashokkumar, K. 2.Chandramohan, K.M. 3.Tamilselvan, S. 4.Ameenulla 5.Sasikumar, K.S. 6.Nirandari, V. 7.Ravishankar, R.K. 8.Ruthramani, T. 9.Vijayakumar, R. 10.TVS Gandhi 11.Kumaresan, M12. Gopinath, M. 13.Sakthi, K. 14.Sivan, C. 19.G.Karpagavalli (Respondents 15 to 18 struck off in ELP.No.9 of 2021 as perorder of this Court dated 11.01.2022 made in O.A.No.672 of 2021in ELP.No.9 of 2021) ... RespondentsPrayer: Election Petition filed under Sections 80, 80A, 81, 84 r/w Sections 100, 101, 123, 123(6) & 129 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 R/w. The conduct of Election Rules, 1961, for the following reliefs: i) declare the election of the 1st respondent to No.53, Krishnagiri Assembly Constituency in the State of Tamil Nadu on 02.05.2021 as illegal, void and liable to be set aside. ii) D...


May 28 2025

Suresh Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: May-28-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.05.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADISuresh ... Petitioner(s) /Accused No.1 Vs. State represented by the Inspector of Police, Kumarapalayam Police Station, Namakkal District. ... Respondent(s)/ Complainant Crime No.406 of 2022 Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with CC.No.29 of 2023, pending trial on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Kumarapalayam. For petitioner(s) : Mr.M.Prabaharan For Respondent(s) : Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 30.09.2024, seeking bail in Crime No.406 of 2022 registered for the offences under Section 379 of IPC. Page No.1 of 72. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is anaccused facing trial in CC.No.29 of 2023, pending trial on the fi...


May 28 2025

S.Namachivayam vs Union of India

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: May-28-2025

W.M.P.No.21618 of 2025 in W.P.No.19367 of 2025SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.andT.V.THAMILSELVI, J.Petition filed to permit the petitioners to file a single writ petition jointly is ordered, subject to payment of separate court fees. (S.K.R., J.) (T.V.T.S., J.) 28.05.2025 sra https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


May 23 2025

V.Umapathy vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Court: Chennai

Decided on: May-23-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23.05.2025Coram:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN V.Umapathy .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Additional Chief Secretary, Water Resource Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600009. 2.The Engineer-in-Chief & Chief Engineer (General), Water Resources Department (WRD), Chepauk, Chennai - 5. 3.The District Collector, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur. ... Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to take appropriate legal action against the Executive Engineer (WRD) and the concerned officials responsible for collapse of the "Strengthening andformation of Flood Bank with River training works damaged due to Cyclone Michaung in Kosasthalaiyar River from L.S.119.10 k.m. to L.S.127.60 k.m. in Ponneri Taluk, Tiruvallur" within...


May 22 2025

Sri-La-Sri Ajappa Nateswara Pa vs the Commissioner,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: May-22-2025

2025:MHC:1197IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASOrders reserved on : 07.04.2025 Orders pronounced on : 22.05.2025CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Sri-la-Sri Sathya Gnana Mahadeva Desika Paramachariya Swamigal, for the Guru Maha Sannithanam, Adheenakarthar of Velakuruchi Mutt and Sole Hereditary trustee of Abishehakattalai and Annadhana Kattalai, Sri Thiyagarajassamy temple, Thiruvarur, residing at Thirupugalur, Nagapattinam District. .. PetitionerVersus1. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, 119 Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai - 34.2. The Executive Officer,Arulmigu Thiyagarajaswami Temple, Thiruvarur. .. Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the notice in R.C.No.48212/2002/D1, dated 12.01.2010 issued by the 1st respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.V.R.Shanmuganatham, for Mr.A.R.Nixon For Resp...


May 22 2025

P.Baskar vs Union of India

Court: Chennai

Decided on: May-22-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22.05.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.R. SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN W.P.No.3239 of 2025 and W.M.P.No.10220 of 2025 P.Baskar Petitioner vs.1. Union of India Rep. by its Secretary to Government (Revenue) Government of Puducherry Chief Secretariat Puducherry 605 0012. The Tahsildar Bahour Tahsildar Office Bahour Commune Panchayat Puducherry 607 402 RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 24.09.2024 and consequently, direct the 2nd respondent to issue Scheduled Caste (Origin) Certificate to the petitioner and his children viz., B.Abishek and B.Suhasini within a stipulated time. Page Nos.1/6 For petitioner Mr. S. Vijayakumar For respondents Mr. V. Vasantha Kumar Addl. Govt. Pleader (Puducherry)ORDER(made by G.R. SWAMINATHAN, J.) Heard both sides.2. The writ ...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial