Chennai Court April 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kumaresan vs the State Rep. by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 01.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL OP NO.9570 of 2025 Kumaresan Petitioner Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Sholavaram Police Station, Thiruvallur District. (Crime No.199 of 2025) Respondent Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to enlarge the petitioner /Accused on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in Crime No. 199 of 2025 pending on the file of the respondent police. For petitioner : M/s.R Vinoth For Respondent : Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 118(1) and 351(3) of the BNS Act, in Crime No.199 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner attemptedto take photographs of the de facto complainant in the bus stand and when th...
Nirmal Gemini Kannan @ Nimmel Gemini Kannan vs the State Rep by Its In ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
Crl.OP.No.9829 of 2025 and Crl.MP.No.6490 of 2025G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.At the instance of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, today this matter has been posted under the caption for being mentioned.2. Heard, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.3. On hearing the submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, it is ordered that the fifth paragraph of the order passed in Crl.OP.No.9829 of 2025 dated 01.04.2025 shall read as follows:5. In view of the above, the proceedings in C.C.No.356 of 2023 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Alandur, Chennai, is hereby quashed as against the petitioners. The terms of Joint Memo of Compromise shall form part and parcel of this Order. The petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.5,000/-, (Rupees Five Thousand only) as costs, to the Chief Justice Relief Fund, Tamil Nadu, forthwith and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry. 4. Accordingly, the Registr...
Sakthivel vs the State Rep by the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 01.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL OP NO.9550 of 2025 Sakthivel Petitioner Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Ramanatham Police Station, Cuddalore. (Crime No.59 of 2025) Respondent Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to enlarge the petitioner /Accused on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in Crime No. 59 of 2025 pending on the file of the respondent police. For petitioner : M/s. Kannan K For Respondent : Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 118(1) and 351(2) of the BNS Act, in Crime No.59 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner rode his twowheeler in a rash and negligent manner near the de facto complainant's house, du...
Dheenadayalan Vs The State, Rep by The Sub-Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 01.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL OP NO.9568 of 2025 D Dheenadayalan Petitioner/A2 Vs The State Rep by, The Sub-Inspector of Police, E-5, Sholavaram Police Station, Chennai 600 067. (Crime No.182 of 2025) RespondentCriminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to enlarge the petitioner /Accused on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in Crime No. 182 of 2025 pending on the file of the respondent police. For petitioner : M/s.John Sathyan, Senior Counsel for M/s.Kalidas Jaganathan For de facto complainant /Intervener : M/s.S Sengkodi For Respondent : Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 194 of the BNSS altered @ Section 108 of the BNS in Crime No.182 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The case of the...
E Kamalesh Krishna Sai vs the State Rep. by the Sub-Inspector of Polic ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
Crl.O.P.No.9579 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN. J., This matter is posted today before this Court under the caption 'For Being Mentioned' at the instance of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.2. The learned counsel appearing for thepetitioner submitted that on 01.04.2025, this Court had granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.9579 of 2025. However, in the order, the name of the petitioner is wrongly mentioned as 'E.Kamalesh Krishna' instead of 'E.Kamalesh Krishna Sai'. Thus, he prayed for suitable directions.3. Considering the submissions made by thelearned counsel for the petitioner, Registry is directed to issue order copy afresh forthwith, by making necessary corrections in the order dated 01.04.2025 made in Crl.OP.No.9579 of 2025.4. Further, time to furnish surety is extendedby a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 20.06.2025 Issue order copy today Upload order copy forthwith ars https://www.mhc.t...
M/S Annur Ss Agro Foods Pvt Ltd., vs the Chairman
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 01.04.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P.No. 13051 of 2025 M/S. ANNUR SS AGRO FOODS PVT LTD., #107, NAGAMMAPUDUR POST, AVINASHI MAIN ROAD, ANNUR-COIMBATORE DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY S. SIVAKUMAR ... Petitioner Vs1. THE CHAIRMAN, TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED,2. CHIEF ENGINEER,NON-CONVENTIONAL ENERGY SOURCES, TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED, ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to refund Rs.50,00,000/- payable to the petitioner towards refundable security deposit. For Petitioner : Mr.S.P.Parthasarathy For R1 & R2 : Ms.R.Preethika for Mr.D.R.ArunkumarORDERThe petitioner herein seeks a direction to respondents to refund Rs.50,00,000/- payable to the petitioner towards refundable security deposit.2. The petitioner filed...
Eternal Renewables Pvt Ltd vs the Chairman
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 01.04.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P.No. 13045 of 2025 ETERNAL RENEWABLES PVT LTD.,25. DEVANGAPURAM, MAHALINGAPURAM POST, POLLACHI TALUK, COIMBATORE - 642 002, REPD. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY A.VARATHARAJAN. ... Petitioner Vs.CHENNAI - 600 002. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to refund Rs.75,00,000/- payable to the petitioner towards refundable security deposit. For Petitioner : Mr.S.P.Parthasarathy For R1 to R3 : Ms.R.Preethika for Mr.D.R.ArunkumarORDERThis writ petition is with a prayer to direct the respondents to refund the sum of Rs.75,00,000/- payable to the petitioner towards refundable security deposit.2. In this case, the petitioner submits that there seems to be a nametransfer and those parties have commenced the unit and seeks for refund. In the facts and circumstances ...
K Subramani Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 01.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL OP NO.9556 of 2025 K Subramani Petitioner Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Marandahalli Police Station, Dharmapuri Distict. (Crime No.40 of 2025) Respondent Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to enlarge the petitioner /Accused on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in Crime No. 40 of 2025 pending on the file of the respondent police. For petitioner : M/s. Elumalai T For Respondent : Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 194(3) of the BNSS @ 108 of the BNS r/w Sections 9,10,11 of the Child Marriage Act, in Crime No.40 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that the second accused is thewife of the de facto complainan...
M/S Annur Ss Agro Foods Pvt Ltd., vs the Chairman
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 01.04.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P.No.13049 of 2025 M/S. ANNUR SS AGRO FOODS PVT LTD., #107, NAGAMMAPUDUR POST, AVINASHI MAIN ROAD, ANNUR-COIMBATORE DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY S. SIVAKUMAR ... Petitioner Vs1. THE CHAIRMAN, TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED,2. CHIEF ENGINEER,NON-CONVENTIONAL ENERGY SOURCES, TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION LIMITED, ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to refund Rs.25,00,000/- payable to the petitioner towards refundable security deposit. For Petitioner : Mr.S.P.Parthasarathy For R1 & R2 : Ms.R.Preethika for Mr.D.R.ArunkumarORDERThe petitioner herein seeks a direction to respondents to refund Rs.25,00,000/- payable to the petitioner towards refundable security deposit.2. The petitioner filed ...
Tvl. Vino Construction Vs The State Tax Officer Investigation GR 1 Ero ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 01-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY AND WMP NO. 13163 OF 2025,WMP NO. 13164 OF 2025 Tvl. Vino Construction, Rep by its Managing Partner- Thangavel Nagappagowder, 20, Ex-serviceman Colony, Bhavanisagar, Sathyamangalam, Erode-638451. GSTIN 33AAEFV3919R1ZL Petitioner(s) Vs The State Tax Officer Investigation GR 1 Erode Office of the Commercial Tax Officer, Inspection -1, Erode. Respondent(s) PRAYER:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the respondent herein in its impugned order passed in GSTIN. 33AAEFV3919R1ZL/2024- 2025 dated 20.02.2025 along with the Consequential order in Form DRC-07 bearing Reference No.ZD330225203339Q dated 20.02.2025 for the period 2024-2025, and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Ms.R. Hemalatha For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Harsha Raj, Special Government Pleader (t)ORDERThis writ petition has been filed ...
- ‹ Prev
- 860
- 861
- 862
- 863
- 864
- 865
- 866
- 868
- 869
- 870
- Next ›
- Last »