Chennai Court April 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kadher Jamal Vs State Rep. by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.04.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.13558 of 2025 1.Kadher Jamal 2.S.Siva Kumar 3.P.Kaliraj ... Petitioners Vs. 1.State rep. by Inspector of Police, Kannankurichi Police Station, Salem. 2.Sri Omna George ..Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the entire records in respect of charge sheet filed in PRC No.5 of 2008 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Salem and quash the same in view of the above mentioned grounds. For Petitioners : Mr.D.Rajagopal For R1 : Mr.R.Vinothraja, Government Advocate (crl.side).ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in PRC No.5 of 2008 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Salem.2. The case of the prosecution is that the students of Central LawCollege, Salem have agitated against the Management on 19.09.2006. Pursuant to ...
K.Vijayasekar, M/60 vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.04.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY K.VIJAYASEKAR ... Petitioner Vs1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SINGARAVELAR MALIGAI, RAJAJI SALAI, CHENNAI - 600 001.2. THE THASILDHAR, MYLAPORE TALUK, CHENNAI - 600 028.3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SOUTH CHENNAI, GUINDY, CHENNAI - 600 032. ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to cancel the legal heir certificate No.Dis.A1/23249/95 dated 20.10.1995 and thereby direct the respondents to issue a fresh legal heirs certificate including the names of this petitioner along with his sisters and brother name in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Bommuraj For R1 to R3 : Mr.R.Neelakandan, Additional Advocate General VIII assisted by Mr.R.Murthi Government AdvocateORDERThe prayer in the writ petition is to direct the respondents to cancel the legal heir certificat...
Government of Tamil Nadu Vs . DR.K.SRINIVASAN
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
C.M.P.No.5408 of 2025 in W.A.Sr.No.31492 of 2025 C.M.P.No.5487 of 2025 in W.A.Sr.No.33168 of 2025 C.M.P.No.5500 of 2025 in W.A.Sr.No.32409 of 2025 C.M.P.No.5557 of 2025 in W.A.Sr.No.35778 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.5603 of 2025 in W.A.Sr.No.35069 of 2025R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.ANDG.ARUL MURUGAN, J.Accepting the reasons assigned in the affidavits filed in support of these petitions, these petitions are ordered and the delay in filing the above appeals are condoned. (R.S.M., J.) (G.A.M., J.) 30.04.2025 dsa https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Raja vs the Sub Registrar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Raja .. Petitioner Vs 1.The Sub Registrar Mecheri Sub Registrar Office Salem District 2.Senthil Kumar 3.Kandasamy 4.Palanisamy .. RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the refusal check slip dated RFL/Mecheri/35/2024 27.12.2024 issued by the st st 1 respondent and quash the same, subsequently direct the 1 respondent to entertain and register the pathway rights agreement dated 27.12.2024 submitted by the petitioner for registration. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Deepak Kumar For 1st Respondent : Mr.P.Harish Government AdvocateORDERThis writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned refusal check slip st dated 27.12.2024 issued by the 1 respondent and to entertain and register the nd pathway rights dated 27.12.2024 executed by the 2 respondent in f...
Elango Vs Vennila
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
CMP No.6604 of 2025 in CMA SR No.33365 of 2024S.SOUNTHAR, J.Though notice was served to the 5th respondent and its name appear in the cause list, there is no representation on behalf of the 5th respondent. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents 1 to 4. Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed along with the petition the delay of 53 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Registry is directed to number the civilmiscellaneous appeal, if it is otherwise in orderand list the same for admission. Registry is directed to print the name of Mr.V.Chinnasamy, counsel for the respondents 1 to 4 at the time of admission. 30.04.2025 mst https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Kannappan vs Anjugam (Died), Rajendran (Died), 1.Sekar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
CMP NO. 9446 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI S/o.Muthusamy,Thadalan Koil South Street, (Railway Road), Sirkali, Nagapatnam Dist. Vs Anjugam (died), Rajendran (died), 1.Sekar S/o.Thangasamy, Thoppu Street, Pulagapettai, Sirkali, Nagapatnam Dist. and 6 Others CMP NO. 9453 of 2025 Anjugagam (died), 1.Sekar S/o.Thangasamy, Thoppu Street, Pulugapettai, Sirkali Town. and another Vs W/o.Manigandan, South Street, (Railway Road), Thadalankoil, Sirkali Town. and 5 Others SA SR NO. 33232 of 2024 Vs Rajendran (dead) SA SR NO. 33142 of 2024 Anjugagam (dead) Vs For Appellant(s): Mr.M. DEVARAJORDERThese petitions are filed to accept the cause tile by including the legal heirs of the deceased respondents in the above appeal. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions, these petitions are allowed. 30-04-2025 mps Note to office: Registry is directed to carry out necessary a...
B.Shreelakshmi and 2 others Vs B.V.R.Krishna
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
A.No.1645 of 2025 in O.P.No.96 of 2024K.KUMARESH BABU, J.The present Application has been filed to grant leave to mark the photocopies of the documents listed below in evidence in the present Succession O.P.No.96 of 2024 on the file of this Hon'ble Court.2. Considering the averments made inthe affidavit filed in support of this application and having been satisfied with the reasons stated therein, the application in A.No.1645 of 2025 in O.P.No.96 of 2024 is ordered as prayed for. 30.04.2025 kak https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Tamil Selvi vs Saranya
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI W/o. Gunasekaran No. 1/35, 1st Main Road, Venkateswara Nagar, Ramapuram, Chennai 89 Vs W/o. Paneerselvam yogaraj No. 1/35/1/222, 1st Main Road, Venkateswara Nagar, Ramapuram, Chennai 89 and 2 Others SA SR NO. 159665 of 2023 Vs For Appellant(s): Mr.V.AyyapparajaORDERThis petition has been filed to condone the delay of 447 days in paying the deficit court fee of Rs.14,500/- in the appeal.T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.mps 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.On being satisfied with the averments assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Court is inclined to condone the delay. Hence, the delay is condoned. 30.04.2025 mps Note to office:Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in orderand list this matter on 19.06.2025....
Saravanan vs Lakshmi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI S/o. Ponnusamy, 401/H, Aalanthottam, Ramapalayam, Pollikalipalayam Post, Alagumalai Village, Tiruppur Taluk Vs W/o. Govindasamy, D.No.65E, Thaneerpandal Colony, Anupparpalayam(Post) Tiruppur City, Tiruppur District and 4 Others SA SR NO. 92797 of 2023 Vs For Appellant(s): Mr.J.FranklinORDERThis petition has been filed to condone the delay of 577 days in representing the appeal.T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.mps 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.On being satisfied with the averments assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Court is inclined to condone the delay. Hence, the delay is condoned. 30.05.2025 mps Note to office:Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in orderand list this matter on 26.06.2025....
N.Sivakumar vs Martin
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
CMP No.6976 of 2025 in CMA SR No.26388 of 2025S.SOUNTHAR, J.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent. Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed along with the petition the delay of 109 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Registry is directed to number the civilmiscellaneous appeal, if it is otherwise in orderand list the same for admission. Registry is directed to print the name of Ms.M.Malar, counsel for the respondent at the time of admission. 30.04.2025 mst https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »