Chennai Court April 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.Subramanian vs State Rep. by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATE : 30.04.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR in Crl.A.No.58 of 2024 R.Subramanian Formerly Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Mylapore, Chennai 600 028. ... PetitionerVersusState Rep by The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Special Investigation Cell, Chennai. ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Sections 427(e) r/w 500 of BNSS, praying to direct the learned Special Court for the cases under Prevention of Corruption Act, Chennai to return the sum of Rs.8,20,400/- to the petitioner as interim custody, which was seized in the case registered by the respondent police in above said Crime No.23 of 2019, in the custody of the learned Special Court for the cases under Prevention of Corruption Act, Chennai and as mentioned in its judgment dated 06.10.2023 passed in C.C.No.6 of 2023 pending above Criminal Appeal.Petitioner : Mr.K.Prabakar For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl....
R.Thavamani vs R.Durai
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDate : 30.04.2025CORAM:THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN R.Thavamani ..Petitioner in both the cases Vs. K. Prabha ...Respondent in both the cases Prayer in C.M.P.No.4807 of 2022 : This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is AS.No.18 of 2016 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Dharmapuri in OS.No.140 of 2012 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Dharmapuri. Prayer in C.M.P.No.4891 of 2022 : This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is AS.No.19 of 2016 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Dharmapuri in OS.No.144 of 2012 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Dharmapuri. For Petitioner in both the cases : Mr.V.Sakkarapani For Respondent in both the cases : Mr.N.Manokaran A.A.NAKKIRAN.,J gvCOMMON ORDERThese miscellaneous petitions were filed in the year 2022. Thereafter, these matters have been kept pending without any interim order, till this date. In the said circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping these petitions pending at this l...
N.Abul Fazal vs P.a.Fariah Faizal and 5 Others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON PRONOUNCED ON15.04.2025 30.04.2025CORAM :THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU A.No.1332 of 2024 in C.S.No.84 of 2023 Mr.N.Abul Fazal Applicant/Plaintiff vs. 1.Mrs.P.A.Fariah Faizal 2.Ms.Fazeela Zennath 3.Ms.Fahmida Zulfa 4.Mr.Naleem Fahdi 5.Mr.N.Afzal 6.Mrs.N.Benazir Respondents/Defendants For Applicant : Mr.M.A.Abdul Wahab For Respondent : Mr.J.Chandran Sundar Sashikumar for RR1-5 No Appearance for R6ORDERThis instant application has been filed to direct the first respondent/1stdefendant to deposit the income derived from the Suit Schedule Property by way of monthly rental income from 12.05.2022 along with the advance of Rs.1,30,000/- till the date of order and continue to deposit the monthly rental income from the date of order to the credit of the above suit in C.S.No.84 of 2023, pending disposal of the above suit.2) Heard Mr.M.A.Abdul Wahab, learned counsel appearing for the Applicant and Mr.J.Chandran Sun...
J.Matheswaran vs P.Jamuna
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI S/o. James, Door No. 9-A, CSI Street, Nasiyanur, Erode District. Vs W/o. Parameswaran Door No. 23/11 CSI Street, Nasiyanur, Erode District. SA SR NO. 122490 of 2023 Vs For Appellant(s): Mr.T.M.HariharanORDERThis petition has been filed to condone the delay of 507 days in representing the appeal.T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.mps 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.On being satisfied with the averments assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Court is inclined to condone the delay. Hence, the delay is condoned. 30-04-2025 mps Note to office:Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in orderand list this matter on 24.06.2025....
Panchalai Tozhirsanga Congress Vs The Managing Director
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.04.2025 PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.D. MARIA CLETE and W.M.P. Nos. 7811 & 7812 of 2020 Panchalai Tozhirsanga Congress, (Regn.No.783/RTU/92) Represented by its President, No.81, 9th Cross Moogambigai Nagar II, Nainar Mandapam, Puducherry 605 004. ... PetitionerVersus1. The Managing Director Sri Bharathee Mills (A Government of Puducherry undertaking) Cuddalore Main Road Mudaliarpet, Puducherry 605 004.2. Union of India Represented by Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, North Block, Central Secretariat New Delhi 110 001.3. Administrator of Puducherry Government of Puducherry, Puducherry.4. Union Territory of Puducherry Rep. by Chief Secretary to Government5. Union Territory of Puducherry Rep. by Secretary to Government Department of Industry and Commerce6. Union Territory of Puducherry Rep. by Secretary to Government Department of Labour,7. Deputy Labour Commissioner 2nd Floor, Labour Department Complex, Gandhi Nagar, Pud...
S.Saravanan vs the State by, the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
Crl.M.P.No.3950 of 2025 in Crl.A.Sr.No. 12773 of 2025 P.VELMURUGAN, J This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed to condone the delay of 657 days in filing the above Criminal Appeal against the order of acquittal in C.C.No.666 of 2020 dated 09.05.2023 on the file of the III Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai -1.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent/State and perused the materials available on record.3. Despite service of notice on the respondents 2 and 3, there is no appearance either in person or through counsel.4. Though the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit are not satisfactory, inorder to give an opportunity to the petitioner tochallenge the impunged judgment of acquittal, delay is condoned. Accordingly, this petition is ordered.5. Registry is directed to number the above Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order. 30.04.2025 ms...
Tamilnadu State CIVIL Services vs the Principal Secretary to
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASORDERS RESERVED ON : 31.01.2025 ORDERS PRONOUNCED ON : 30.04.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMARTamilnadu State Civil Services Officers (Retired) Association, No.46, Adappanvayal 3rd Street, Pudukottai Town-622 002, Rep., by its General Secretary, Singaram Munirathinam ... Petitioner Vs. The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9. ... Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the proceedings of the respondent in its G.O.Ms.No.235, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 01.06.2009 and quash Para 2(ii)(d) thereof insofar as it grants only 40% fitment weightage to retirees before 01.01.2006 and to consequently direct the respondent to fix the pension of the pre 01.01.2006 retirees on par with post 01.01.2006 retirees by allowing them revised pension at 50%...
Ramasamy Gounder vs Kaliammal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Ramasamy Gounder S/o.Karupanna Gounder, res at Vellalapatti, District and 2 Others Vs KALIAMMAL W/o.Kandasamy gounder, res at Vellalapatti, District and 3 Others SA SR NO. 82861 of 2021 KALIYAMMAL Vs RAMASAMY For Appellant(s) : Mr.Krishna Prasad R for M/s. Sarvabhauman AssociatesT.V.THAMILSELVI, J.mpsORDERThis petition has been filed to condone the delay of 958 days in paying the deficit court fee of Rs.30/- in the appeal. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.On being satisfied with the averments assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Court is inclined to condone the delay. Hence, the delay is condoned. 30-04-2025 mps Note to office:Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in orderand list this matter on 23.06.2025....
E.Ravi Kumar vs N.Sujatha
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
Crl.M.P.No.3902 of 2025 in Crl.A.Sr.No. 64472 of 2024 P.VELMURUGAN, J This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed to condone the delay of 100 days in filing the above Criminal Appeal against the order dated 14.05.2024 made in C.C.No.9376 of 2018 on the file of the Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court-2, Egmore @ Allikulam, Chennai.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.3. There is no representation for the respondent.4. Though the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit are not satisfactory, inorder to give an opportunity to the petitioner tochallenge the impunged judgment, delay is condoned. Accordingly, this petition is ordered.5. Registry is directed to number the above Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order. 30.04.2025 ms https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
T. Peter vs Jayant Packaging Private Limited
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
C.M.P.No.8042 of 2025 in W.A.Sr.No.56291 of 2024R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.ANDG.ARUL MURUGAN, J.Accepting the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay of 309 days in paying the deficit Court fee is condoned. (R.S.M., J.) (G.A.M., J.) 30.04.2025 dsa https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »