Chennai Court April 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The State of Tamil Nadu vs Dr.Sangkavi R
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
CMP.No.4078 of 2025 in WA.SR.No.22250 of 2025S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.ANDK.RAJASEKAR, J.In view of the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, filed in support of the petition, delay stands condoned and this Miscellaneous Petition is ordered, accordingly. (S.M.S., J.) (K.R.S., J.) 30.04.2025 veda Note: Registry is directed to number the writ appeal, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
S.Venkatakrishna Rao vs Vanamala Kumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
CMP.No.5717 of 2025 in AS.SR.No.23186 of 2025S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.ANDK.RAJASEKAR, J.The Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 223 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. The learned Counsel for the respondent raised objection that the reasons stated in the affidavit to condone the delay is insufficient.3. However, this Court is of the considered opinion that the delay of 223 days cannot be construed as enormous warranting rejection.4. Thus, delay stands condoned and this Miscellaneous Petition is ordered, accordingly. (S.M.S., J.) (K.R.S., J.) 30.04.2025 veda Note:Registry is directed to number the appeal suit, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Akurati Nagarjuna vs the State Rep by ,the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Crl.M.P.No.4276 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.20460 of 2024 Akurati Nagarjuna ...Petitioner/Accused Vs. State rep by 1.Inspector of Police, T-16, Semmancherry Police Station, Chennai. 2.R.Arumugam ...Respondents PRAYER: This criminal original petition has been filed under Section 483(3) BNSS, pleased to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the second respondent herein in Crl.O.P.No.20460 of 2024, dated 29.08.2024. For Petitioner: Mr.R.Ramesh For R1 : M/s.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Criminal side) For R2 : M/s.R.KrishnamurthyORDERThis instant petition has been filed seeking cancellation of the ordergranting anticipatory bail to the second respondent in Crl.O.P.No.20460 of Page No.1 of 62024. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Court while granting anticipatory bail had directed the second respondent to deposit a sum of Rs.37,00,000/- to the credit of Crime No.1...
Mahendra Lokiah and another Vs K Shivashankar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY1. Mahendra Lokiah2. Chitra Pawan Kumar ... Plaintiffs -vs- K.Shivashankar Having address at Kailash 6/25, Cenotaph Road, First Street, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018. ... Defendant PRAYER: Civil Suit (Commercial Division) filed under Order IV Rule 1 ofOS Rules Read With Order VII Rule 1 CPC, praying to grant a judgmentand decree on the following terms:- (a). Directing the defendant to pay the plaintiffs a sum of Rs.2,50,00,000/- as compensation for illegally appropriating the super-built up area of 1,704.2 Sq.ft that fell to the share of the plaintiffs as per JDA dated 22.09.2011 in the suit schedule property along with interest on the aforesaid sum at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of plaint till realization.(b) To declare that the Tripartite Agreement dated 16.06.2014concerning the right to use Terrace Portion exclusively in suit property by th defendant is no longer...
Rathnakumar vs E.Nandakumar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASOrders Reserved on : 24.04.2025 Orders Pronounced on : 30.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and Crl.M.P.No.2903 and 2904 of 2023 Rathnakumar ... Petitioner Vs E.Nandakumar ... Respondent Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records, quash the complaint and all consequential proceedings in C.C.No.799 of 2022 pending on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpattu. For Petitioner : Mr.Krishna Srinivasan, Senior Counsel for M/s.Ramasubramanian Associates For Respondent : Mr.G.RavikumarORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.799 of 2022 pending on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpattu.2. The respondent lodged a private complaint and the same hasbeen taken cognizance for the offence punishable under Sections 120B, 341, 342, 384, and 506(1) of IPC, alleging that the respondent was working as a Senior Executive...
S.N.S.Nachimuthu Mudaliyar vs a/M Bava Ousha Deeswararswamy Thirukovil
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
CMP No.6542 of 2020 in S.A No.323/2020A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.This petition has been filed by the petitioner/appellant to receive additional documents as mentioned in the petition.2. Heard both sides.3.Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this Court is inclined to permit the petitioner/ appellant to mark the additional documents as mentioned in the petition, however, subject to admissibility, relevancy and proof. Accordingly, this petition is allowed. 30.04.2025 uma (2/3) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
S.N.S.Nachimuthu Mudaliyar vs a/M Bava Ousha Deeswararswamy Thirukovil
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDate : 30.04.2025CORAM:THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN C.M.P No.6539 of 2020 in S.A No.323 of 2020 S.N.S.Nachimuthu Mudaliyar ...Petitioner Vs. Arulmigu Bava Ousha Deewara Swami Tirukovil Represented by its Executive Officer Thiruthuraipoondi Town and Post Thiruturaipoondi District. ...Respondent Prayer: This civil miscellaneous petition is filed to stay all further proceedings in O.S No.10 of 2012 dated 20.02.2017 on the file of District Munsif, Thiruturaipoondi. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar For Respondent : Mr.R.Karthikeyan A.A.NAKKIRAN,J umaORDERThis miscellaneous petition was filed in the year 2020. Thereafter, the matter has been kept pending without any interim order, till this date. In the said circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping this petition pending at this length of time and hence, the same is closed. 30.04.2025 uma (1/3) Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To The...
Kantha vs Unnamalai Ammal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
CMP NO. 13977 of 2021IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN1. Kantha2. Yasoda3. Santha4. Kumar5. Geetha6. Lalitha Petitioner (s) Vs1. Unnamalai Ammal2. Moorthy3. Arumugam4. Mani Respondent(s) For Petitioner (s): V.R.Annagandhi For Respondent(s):Mr.R.KarthikeyanORDERHeard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.2. This miscellaneous petition was filed in the year 2021. Notice through court aswell as privately was ordered by this court on 08.09.2021 and thereafter the same has been kept pending till this date without any orders. In the said circumstances, noA.A.NAKKIRAN, J.msr useful purpose will be served in keeping this miscellaneous petition pending, at this length of time and hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Msr 30-04-2025 To1. The Prl. Sub Judge, Krishnagiri2. The District Munsif, Krishnagiri...
TS Palanisamy Vs Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
CMP No.10196 of 2025 in CMA SR No.25805 of 2025S.SOUNTHAR, J.The respondents 2 to 5 remained exparte before the Tribunal and hence, notice to them is dispensed with. Mr.C.Sathish, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the first respondent. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the first respondent. Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed along with the petition, the delay of 11 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Registry is directed to number the civilmiscellaneous appeal, if it is otherwise in orderand list the same for admission. Registry is directed to print the name of Mr.C.Sathish, Government Advocate for the first respondent at the time of admission. 30.04.2025 mst https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Bharat Heavy Electronics Limited Vs The General Secretary
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS(Special Original Jurisdiction) RESERVED ON : 12.03.2025PRONOUNCED ON : 30.04.2025PRESENT: THE HONBLE DR. JUSTICE A.D. MARIA CLETE W.P.No. 5840 of 2020 and WMP No. 6845 of 20201. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited Boiler Auxiliaries Plant, Indira Gandhi Industrial Complex, Ranipet 632 406. Tamil Nadu Represented by its Additional General Manager (HR).2. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, Corporate Office, BHEL House, Siri Fort, New Delhi 110 049. Petitioners Vs. The General Secretary BAP Mazdoor Sangam (BMS) BAP / BHEL, BHEL Post, Ranipet 632 406. Respondent Prayer in W.P.To issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other writ or order or direction in the nature of Writ calling for the records relating to the Award dated 11.11.2019 made in I.D.No.91 of 2015 on the file of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court, Chennai, and quash the same and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the cir...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »