Chennai Court April 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P.Poomathi Vs K.R.Palani
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
CMP NO. 4074 of 2022IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN CMP. No. 4074 of 2022 in SA.No.203 of 2022 P.Poomathi ...Petitioner/Appellant Vs 1.K.R.Palani2. Jayalakshmi3. Dinakaran4. Sankaran5. Karthikeyan ...RespondentsPrayer: To pass an order of injunction restraining the 1st respondent, his men and agent from any way bringing the property for auction which is morefully described in schedule below, subject matter in AS.No.06 of 2017 on the file of the Addl. District Judge (Fast Track Court), Vellore and E.A.No.86 of 2009 in E.P.No.17 of 2004 in OS.No.77 of 2001 on the file of the Subordiante Judge, Gudiyattam, Vellore District. For Petitioner: Mr.K.A.Ravindran For Respondents : Mr.P.Vasanth for R1A.A.NAKKIRAN.,J.msrORDERHeard both sides.2. In this miscellaneous petition, an order of Interim injunction was granted on15.03.2022. Thereafter, the matter has been kept pending till now without any further orders. Hence, the inter...
K.Annamalai and another Vs Dr. P.Senthil Kumar, I.A.S., and another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 30.04.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN 1.K.Annamalai 2.V.Govindan ...Petitioners Vs. 1.Dr.P.Senthil Kumar, IAS., Additional Chief Secretary, 2.Srinivas R.Reddy, IFS., The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Chennai 600 032 ...RespondentsPRAYER: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience in not complying with the order dated 09.07.2024 passed by this Court in WP.No.18828 of 2024. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Mani For Respondents : Mr.C.Selvaraj, Additional Government PleaderORDERThis contempt petition has been filed to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience in not complying with the order dated 09.07.2024 passed by this Court in WP.No.18828 of 2024, thereby the respondents were directed to pass orders in the light of the order passed in WP.No.21349 of 2023 dated 03.08.2023 within a time frame.2. The learned Additiona...
Keerthika Rajkumar Vs Gnana Shekaran
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU in O.P.No.198 of 2025 Keerthika Rajkumar No.21, Spartan Nagar, Mogappair East, Chennai 600 037. Applicant(s) Vs Gnana Shekaran No.11/24, Jai Nagar, Thaneerpandal Road, Peelamedu P.O, Coimbatore - 641 004. Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): M/s.S.Praveennath For Respondent(s): Mr.Kavin PrabhuORDERThe present application has been filed to direct the petitioner to grant Interim custody of the minor male child, named Kriyan Raj Shekar born on 08.12.2021 and currently aged about 3 years till pendency of this O.P.2. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit thatthe passport of the minor child had expired and she had taken out the present application to appoint her as guardian based upon the Memorandum of Understanding that had been arrived at between the parties, which permitted the applicant to have permanent custody of the child.3. In such view of the matter, the applica...
Sagadevan vs Kannan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CMP No. 3539 of 2021 AND SA NO. 55 OF 20211. Sagadevan2. Arjunan3. Deivanai4. Indra Gandhi5. Vijayalakshmi6. Kalaivani ..Appellant(s) Vs1. Kannan2. Arumugam3. Malarkodi4. Mallika5. Palaniammal..Respondent(s) PRAYER IN CMP No. 3539 of 2021 To decree the suit O.S.No.458 of 2005 on the file of the court of Additional District Munsif, Gingee as per the admission made by the respondents/defendants in their written statement especially in paragraphs 5 to 9 filed in O.S.No.458 of 2005. PRAYER IN SA No. 55 of 2021 Second Appeal filed under Sec.100 of C.P.C., praying to set aside thejudgment and decree passed in AS.No.11/2015 dt 12/02/2019 on the file ofSub Judge at Gingee confirming the judgement and decree dated 28.04.2015 made in OS No.458/2005 on the file of Additional District Munsif, Gingee. For Appellant(s): Mr.T.Dhanasekaran For Respondent(s): No AppearanceORDERThis Civil Miscella...
Mahalingam vs Melvin Prasath
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated :30.04.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR CMA No.1281 of 2025 Mahalingam ... Appellant Vs. 1.Melvin Prasath 2.Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited GE Plaza, Airport Road, Yerowada, Pune-411 006 ... Respondents Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to set aside the award made in M.C.O.P.No.228 of 2013 dated 06.03.2023 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Judge Court at Sankari. For Appellant : Mr.V.Balamurugan For Respondents : M/s.R.Sree Vidhya for R2 R1-Notice dispensed withJUDGMENTAggrieved by the quantum of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the injured claimant has come before this court by way of this appeal.2. According to the appellant/claimant, he was riding Bajaj Platinavehicle on 04.01.2013 in Sangagiri to Salem Main Road. At that point of time, a car belonged to the first respondent, insured with the second...
Mani vs T.Vanitha
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
CMP No.6985 of 2025 in CMA SR No.21006 of 2025S.SOUNTHAR, J.Notice to the first respondent already dispensed with. Though private notice was served to the 2nd respondent and its name appear in the cause list, there is no representation on behalf of the 2nd respondent. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed along with the petition the delay of 915 days in filing the appeal is condoned. It is made clear that petitioner is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 915 days on the enhanced award amount, in case of her success in the appeal. Registry is directed to number the civilmiscellaneous appeal, if it is otherwise in orderand list the same for admission. 30.04.2025 mst https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
A.Shanmugam, Vs The Additional Registrar of
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.04.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and A.Shanmugam, S/o.Annamalai ... Petitioner Vs. Namakkal District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent in his Proceedings No.Nil dated 27.04.2016 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondents : For R1 and R3 : Mr.K.Tamilvendan Government Advocate For R2 : Mr.L.P.ShanmugasundaramORDEROn the previous occasion i.e., on 24.04.2025, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that this Writ Petition may have become infructuous and therefore he had sought time till 28.04.2025.2. On 28.04.2025, there is a request for adjournment on behalf of the Petitioner and this case was adjourned today i.e., on 30.04.2025.3. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has merely challenged theCommuni...
Vellamalayan (died) Vellaiyan (Died), 1.Nadupillai Vs Muthammal (died) ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
C.M.P.No. 8305 of 2025 inT.V. THAMILSELVI, J.The above Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking a direction to declare the petitioners 7, 8 and 17 viz., Ramsami, Suguna and Soundar as major in the above appeal and to discharge the 14th petitioner/Guardian Mrs.Pappathi, from the guardianship of minors in the above Second Appeal.2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learnedcounsel appearing for petitioners/appellants submitted that, at the time of filing appeal, the petitioners 7, 8 and 17 were minors and now, they attained majority. Hence, this petition has been filed to declare them as major and also to discharge 14th petitioner from the guardianship.3. Considering the above facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed. Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the cause title. rppT.V.THAMILSELVI, J.rpp C.M.P.No.8305 of 2025 in (2/2)...
M/S.Vahini Apparels vs M.Manikavasagar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATE : 30.04.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR 1.M/s.Vahini Apparels, Represented by its Partner, R.Sakthi Renuka, W/o.Shanmugam, Anuparpalayam, Tiruppur District. 2.P.Sakthi Renuka Partner of M/s.Vahini Apparels ... Petitioners/A1 & A2VersusM.Manikavasagar ... Respondent/Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Revision Petition filed under Sections 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., praying to set aside the judgment passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track Court) at Tiruppur in C.C.No.50 of 2015 dated 07.10.2021 as confirmed by the judgment of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tiruppur in C.A.No.102 of 2021 dated 24.01.2022. Petitioners : Mr.S.N.Arunkumar For Respondent : Mr.M.SivavarthananORDERThe petitioners/A1 & A2 in C.C.No.50 of 2015 were convicted by the trial Court by the judgment dated 07.10.2021 on the complaint filed by the respondent for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and the second...
J.Karthikeyan Vs P.Saranya
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON : 27.03.2025PRONOUNCED ON : 30.04.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE C.M.A. No. 1943 of 2024 J.Karthikeyan ... Appellant Vs. P.Saranya ... Respondent PRAYER: Civil Miscellaenous Appeal filed under Section 19 of Family Courts Act, 1984 against the order passed in H.M.O.P.No.749 of 2022 on the file of III Additional Family Judge at Chennai dated 22.11.2023. For Appellant : Mr. J. Kamaraj. For Respondent : No appearance.JUDGMENT(Delivered by Dr. A.D. Maria clete, J) This appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 22.11.2023 passed by the III Additional Principal Family Court, in H.M.O.P. No.749 of 2022. The appellant, who was the petitioner/husband before the Family Court, filed a petition seeking divorce on the ground of cruelty. The said petition was dismissed, and the present appeal challenges that dismissal.2.The brief facts of the case are as follows: The marr...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »