Chennai Court April 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The State of Tamilnadu vs S Ravichandran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
C.M.P.No.903 of 2025 in W.A.Sr.No.2974 of 2025R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.ANDG.ARUL MURUGAN, J.Accepting the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay of 344 days in filing the above appeal is condoned. (R.S.M., J.) (G.A.M., J.) 30.04.2025 dsa https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
E.Dhanapal vs E.Arunagiri (Deceased)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.04.2025CORAM:THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN TOS.No.6 of 2002 and CS.No.797 of 2002 In TOS.No.6 of 2002: E.Dhanapal ... Petitioner/Plaintiff vs. 1.E.Arunagiri (deceased)2. Kuppammal3. Nagammal4. Sundarammal5. Sulochana6. A. Mariammal7. A. Murugavel8.A. Jagadeeswari (Defendants 5 to 8 brought on record as L.Rs of the deceased 1st defendant as per order dated 28.11.2013 in A.No.4798/2013. Time granted by order dt 20.01.2014) ...Caveators/Defendants Prayer: Testamentary Original Suit filed under Sections 232 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act XXXIX of 1925 for the grant of Letters of Administration. Against this petition, caveat was filed on 30.10.2001 and 05.02.2002 by the Caveators above named. The supporting affidavit was filed on 30.10.2001 and 05.02.2002 respectively. Hence, O.P.No.678 of 1995, the Original Petition has been converted into Testamentary Original Suit No.6 of 2002. In Tr.CS.No.797 of 2002:1. A. Mariammal2.A. Muru...
Ramasamy vs Mahalingam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
SA NO. 1060 of 2021IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN Ramasamy Appellant(s) Vs Mahalingam Respondent(s) Prayer: Second Appeal filed under section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 13.03.2020 passed by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Ariyalur in AS.4 of 2018, thereby confirming the judgment and decree dated 12.01.2018 passed by the Addl. District Munsif, Ariyalur in O.S.No.50 of 2008. For Appellant(s): Mr.T.S.Kanmani For Respondent(s): No representationJUDGMENTLearned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this court to withdraw this appeal and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.msr2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 30-04-2025 Index:Yes/No Internet:yes/No msr To1. The Principal Subordina...
R.Jayanthi and 2 others Vs C.Gajalakshmi and 2 others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA in T.O.S.No.63 of 20161. R.Jayanthi2. R.Naveenkumar3. R.Baskar ... Petitioners Vs.1. C.Gajalakshmi2. A.Rajeswari3. Nagaraj @ Meganathan ... Respondents Review Petition is to review the judgment dated 29.08.2023 passed in T.O.S.No.63 of 2016 by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Palaniappan For R1 : Mr.M.BaskaranORDERThe only ground that has been raised in this Review Petition is that the result of the judgment in TOS.No.63 of 2016 was on the basis that P.W.2 was not available for cross-examination.2. Mr.A.Palaniappan, the learned counsel for the Review Petitioners /plaintiffs, submitted that the adjudication of the Master Court would show that P.W.2 was present on 19.08.2019 for chief examination but, he was not cross-examined. The adjudication does not show whether the case was adjourned on the request of the defense counsel for cross-examining P.W.2. When the case was posted to the ne...
J. Shanthi vs J.N. Sasikala
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI AND CMP NO. 11079 OF 2025 J. Shanthi Appellant Vs1. J.N. Sasikala2.The Sub Registrar Keelapaluvoor, Ariyalur Taluk and Dt. Respondents PRAYER :- Second Appeal filed under Sec.100 of Civil Procedure Code, praying to set aside the Judgement and decree dated 28.04.2023 passed in A.S.No.5/2019 on the file of Additional District Judge, at Ariyalur, confirming the Judgement in OS No.37/2008 order dated 09.11.2018 on the file of Subordinate Judge at Ariyalur. For Appellant: Mr. A.M.KrishnamoorthyFor Respondents: Mr.R.Siddharth Addl. Govt. Pleader for R2JUDGEMENTThe appellant, who is the plaintiff filed the suit for the relief of specific performance and permanent injunction before the trial court in O.S. No. 37 of 2008 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Ariyalur and the same was dismissed by the trial court. Against which, she preferred an appeal in A.S.No.5 of 2019 on the file of Addl. Di...
M/S Virtusa Consulting Services Pvt. Ltd vs Income Tax Officer Osd
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on 12.03.2025Pronounced on .04.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN M/s.Virtusa Consulting Services Private Limited Foremerly known as M/s.Polaris Software Lab Limited, No.34, IT Highway, Navalur, Chennai 603 103. ... Appellant/Respondent in both TCAs. (Appellant company name amended vide Courtorder dated 20.09.2022 made in C.M.P.Nos.5501 and 5503 of 2022 in T.C.A.Nos.1370 and 1371 of 2009) Vs. Income Tax Officer (OSD), Company Circle V (2), 4th Floor, Main Building, 121, Nungambakkam High Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. ... Respondent/Appellant in both TCAs.Prayer in Tax Case (Appeal) No.1370 of 2009: Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench 'B' dated 03.07.2009 in I.T.A.No.2156/MDS/2007. Prayer in Tax Case (Appeal) No.1371 of 2009: Appeal under Section 260A of the Income ...
The Managing Director vs M.Sivagangai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
CMP No.10584 of 2025 in CMA SR No.23216 of 2024S.SOUNTHAR, J.Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed along with the petition, the delay of 308 days in re-presenting the appeal is condoned. 30.04.2025 mst https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Shakuntala Mohunta vs Ramkishen
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDate :30.04.2025CORAM:THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN C.M.P. No.3497 of 2022 in Shakuntala Mohunta ...Petitioners Vs. 1.Ramkishen Harichand (died)2. Giridharilal3. Narayandas4. Anand5. Krishna Devi6. Bina Ghanshyamdas7. Duru Gunalan8. Rama Suresh9. M/s.G.K.Enterprises Rep by its Partner Giridhar Hemdev No.303/C, Shivalaya Buildings Commander in Chief Road, Egmore, Chennai 8.10. Giridher Hemdev11. M/s.Kanyalal SrichandRep by its Partner, Srichand Kanyalal Commander-in-chief Road, Egmore, Chennai 8. ...Respondents Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed seeking an injunction restraining the respondents 1 to 8 from conveying any undivided share of interest in the suit property to any 3rd parties in OS.No.1285 of 1988 on the file of the XII Assistant City Civil Court,A.A.NAKKIRAN msr Chennai. For Petitioners : Mr.T.S. Baskaran For Respondents : Ms.J.Dyana for R3 to R8ORDERHeard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned...
Tr Balasubramanium vs the Asst Commissioner
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
2025:MHC:1145IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON : 30.01.2025PRONOUNCED ON : 30.04.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN T.C.(A) Nos. 438 of 2008, 34 of 2009 & 5 of 2010 T.C.A.No. 438 of 2008 T.R.Balasubramanium .. Appellant vs The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax City Circle VII(2), Chennai. Respondent(s) TCA NO. 34 of 2009 T.M.Ramaswamy (Since Deceased) 1.T.R.Natarajan 2.T.R.Viswanathan 3.T.R.Muthukrishnan 4.T.R.Srinivasan 5.T.R.Balasubramanian 6.Kanthimathi Santhanam 7.Lalitha Subramanium 8.Hema Subramanium 9.Praveena Goutham .. AppellantsVs The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax City Circle VII (2), Chennai. .. Respondent TCA NO. 5 of 2010 T.R.Srinivasan Appellant(s) Vs The Asst Commissioner Of Income Tax City Circle- VII(2) Chennai- 34. Respondent(s) Prayer in T.C.A.No. 438 of 2008: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madra...
Vellamalayan (died) Vellaiyan (Died), 1.Nadupillai Vs Muthammal (died) ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
inT.V. THAMILSELVI, J.This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to accept the cause title of the petitioners in the above second appeal.2. Mr.G.Ilamurugu, learned counsel for petitioners submitted that atthe time of filing appeal, some of the petitioners were minors and now, they have attained majority. Hence, it is just and necessary to file the present petition praying to accept the cause title.3. Considering the facts and circumstances, and being satisfied withthe reasons assigned in the affidavit as justifiable one, this petition is allowed. Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the cause title and to number the above Second Appeal if it is otherwise found to be in order and post the matter on 16.06.2025. rppT.V.THAMILSELVI, J.rpp in (1/2)...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »