Chennai Court April 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Devi Granites Vs Assistant Commissioner ST
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.04.2025CoramThe Honourable Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy and W.M.P.No.17764 & 17772 of 2025 Tvl. Devi Granites rep. By its Proprietrix, 5 6F-2, Thattan Thottam, Avinasilingampalayam, Tiruppur 641 654. ..Petitioner Vs.1. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Avinashi Assessment Circle, Avinashi.2. The Deputy Commissioner (CT) Erode. ..RespondentsPrayer Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for records relating to the order-in-reference No.ZD330424218815H dated 27.04.2024, along with annexures passed by the first respondent and to quash the same. For Petitioner : M/s.R.Sri Visvapriya For Respondents : Ms.P.Selvi Government Advocate (T)OrderHeard M/s.R.Sri Visvapriya learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Ms.P.Selvi, learned Government Advocate (T) who takes notice on behalf of the respondents. With consent, the main Writ Petition is taken up for fi...
Aasai Super Tobacco Manufacturing Company, Vs P.K.Kaliashkumar,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 30.04.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Aasai Super Tobacco Manufacturing Company, Represented by its proprietor Mohideen Natharsha, Having its registered office at R.S.No.131/5B, Main Road, Keezhakkalpoondi Village, Tittakudi Taluk, Cuddalore District ...Petitioner Vs. P.K.Kailashkumar, Designated Officer, Cuddalore - 1 ...RespondentPRAYER: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent herein for their willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in WP.No.8198 of 2024 dated 07.03.2025. For Petitioner : M/s.V.Srimathy For Respondent : Mr.Tippu Sulthan, Government AdvocateORDERThis contempt petition has been filed to punish the respondent herein for his willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in WP.No.8198 of 2024 dated 07.03.2025, thereby the second respondent was directed to de- seal the premises of the petitioner situated at R.S.No.131/5...
S.Ganesan Vs The Union of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.No.29301 of 2016 S.Ganesan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Union of India, Rep by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi. 2.The Director General, Central Reserve Police Force, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110 003. 3.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Group Centre, C.R.P.F., Avadi, Chennai 65. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the order passed by the 3rd respondent in his Letter No.P.III- respondents to pass orders on the representation dated 18.06.2016 by directing the 3rd respondent to issue Pension Book, Service Certificate and ID Card together with a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- towards the compensation for the loss caused to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.A.S.Mujibur Rahman For Respondents : Mr.C.Sakt...
M/S. Winnar Vikas International School vs the Assistant Provident Fund ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI M/s. Winnar Vikas International School Rep. By Its Chairman, Ars Kalvi Nagar, Koranampatty Post, Edappadi Taluk, Salem-637 102. Petitioner(s) Vs The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Organization, Regional Office, Steel Plant Road, Dalavaipatti, Salem-636 302. Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Prohibition prohibiting the respondent from proceeding further in terms of orders dated 26.11.2024 bearing CB-RO/SLM PDC/90919/S-Rs.9,59,221/- for the August 2014 to March 2017 and bearing No.CB-RO/SLM PDC/90919/S-4/7Q Proceeding/2024 under Section 7Q of the Levy of interest of Rs.6,11,106/- until the disposal of the appeals filed under Section 7-I of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. For Petitioner(s): N.Ranjith Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr. M. PalanimuthuORD...
Mrs.Narala Ramanaiah vs the Assistant Commissioner (St)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.04.2025CoramThe Honourable Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy and W.M.P.Nos.18010 & 18012 of 2025Mrs.Narala Ramanaiah Proprietor M/s.Sangeetha Auto Works No.13, 3B, NRS Road, Thiruvottiyur, Chennai- 600 019. ...Petitioner Vs. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Thiruvottiyur Assessment Circle No.32, Integrated Commercial Taxes Office Complex, Elephant Gate Bridge, Chennai-600 003. ...Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent in Show Cause Notice issued in DRC-01 dated 24.05.2024 and the consequential order in GSTIN:33AHRPR2644F1Z6/2019-20 along with Form GST DRC-07 vide Reference No.ZD330824213889Z dated 23.08.2024 and quash the same asillegal, erroneous and apart from being barred by limitation and further direct the respondent to consider the objections filed dated 10.04.2023 at the stage of ...
Sivanentharajesh Vs State represented by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.04.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYANSivanentharajesh ... Petitioner Vs. 1.State represented by The Inspector of Police, Puzhal Police Station, Madhavaram, Chennai (in Crime No.395 of 2023) 2.Kumar ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.,/528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned FIR in Crime No.395 of 2023 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Naresh Prabu For Respondents For R1 : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.395 of 2023 on the file of the first respondent, registered for the offences under Sections 341, 294(b), 324 & 506(2) of IPC.2. Pending this petition, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves.3. A Joint Mem...
V.Kamachisundram vs the State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED :30.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Writ Petition No.16417 of 2025 & W.M.P.No.18553 of 20251. V. Kamachisundram, S/o. Vaiyapuri, 30 Pallipatti,2. Ramasamy, S/o. Palaniyappan, Palaniyappar Kovil Road, Belukumchi, Namakkal -637 402.3. Duraisamy, S/o.Nanjudeswaran,4. Chandiran, S/o. Senkottaiyan, 30 Pallipatti,5. Anbalagan, S/o. Elayappagounder, Pallipatti, Namakkal - 622 402. ... Petitioners/versus/1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Fort St. George, Chennai- 600 002.2. The District Collector, 1st Floor, Collectorate, Tiruchengode Road, Namakkal- 637 003.3. The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Rep by its Member Secretary, No. 76, Mount Salai, Guindy, Chennai- 600 032.4. The Junior Engineer, TANGEDCO, Belukumchi Village, Namakkal- 637 402.5. Mani @ Ramasamy,S/o.Elayappagounder, Palaniyappar Kovil Theru, Belukumchi post, Namakkal-637 402. ... Respondents...
Rajendiran (Died) 1.R.Uthira vs Raman
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Rajendiran (died) 1.R.Uthira Rep by legal heris, D/o. Rajendiran, W/o. Ramamurthi, No. 61, Meenakshi Nagar, Vaiyavur Road, Konerikuppam, Kancheepuram District-631 502. and 2 Others Vs S/o. Kolaraan @ Muniyan, Thellur Village and Post, Arni Taluk, THiruvannamalai District. SA SR NO. 91917 of 2023 R.Uthira Vs For Appellant(s): Mr.J. Dev EshwaarORDERThis petition is filed to recognize the petitioners 1 to 3 as the appellants 1 to 3 and to accept the cause title as parties in the above appeal.T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.mps Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is allowed. 30-04-2025 mps Note to office: Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the appeal and list this matter on 16.06.2025....
V.Kamachisundram vs the State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED :30.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.M.P.No.18548 of 2025 in W.P.No.16417 of 20251. V. Kamachisundram, S/o. Vaiyapuri, 30 Pallipatti,2. Ramasamy, S/o. Palaniyappan, Palaniyappar Kovil Road, Belukumchi, Namakkal -637 402.3. Duraisamy, S/o.Nanjudeswaran,4. Chandiran, S/o. Senkottaiyan, 30 Pallipatti,5. Anbalagan, S/o. Elayappagounder, Pallipatti, Namakkal - 622 402. ... Petitioners/versus/1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Fort St. George, Chennai- 600 002.2. The District Collector, 1st Floor, Collectorate, Tiruchengode Road, Namakkal- 637 003.3. The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, Rep by its Member Secretary, No. 76, Mount Salai, Guindy, Chennai- 600 032.4. The Junior Engineer, TANGEDCO, Belukumchi Village, Namakkal- 637 402.5. Mani @ Ramasamy, S/o.Elayappagounder, Palaniyappar Kovil Theru, Belukumchi post, Namakkal-637 402. ... RespondentsWrit Miscell...
Kadhirvel vs G.Mahalingam,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
in This petition is filed by the petitioners to bring on record the respondent Nos.4, 5 and 6 as the legal heirs of the deceased 1st respondent in the above Appeal.2. Heard both sides.3. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that he has no objection in allowing this petition.4. In view of no objection submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents and being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit, this petition is allowed.5. The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendments in the cause title of the Second Appeal.6. Post the second appeal on 18.06.2025. gv 30.04.2025 gv in 30.04.2025...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »