Chennai Court April 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Leela Jayanthi vs the Sub Registrar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
W.M.P.No.18300 of 2025 in W.P.No.16174 of 2025N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.This Writ Miscellaneous Petition filed under Rule 15 of the Madras High Court Writ Rules, 2021, to permit the petitioners to file a single writ petition, is ordered. 30.04.2025 (1/2) mk https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
A.Ayyanar vs the State Rep by the Commissioner of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.04.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN A.Ayyanar ... Petitioner Vs.1. The State rep by its The Commissioner of Police,3. Siva Subramaniyan4. Manikandan5. Velmurugan6. Brammamoorthy ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to give necessary police protection to the petitioner' life and his personal liberty at the hands of respondents 3 to 6. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Subash For Respondents For R1 & R2 : Mr. A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed for seeking police protection at the hands of the respondents 3 to 6 herein.2. It is seen that there is a civil dispute between the petitionerand the respondents 3 to 6 in respect of the property in O.S.No.699 of 2022 on the file of the II Additional Sub Court, Salem. Therefore, in the property dispute the police ...
Sankari Vs The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Sankari ... Petitioner Vs1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o. District Superintendent of Police,2. The Inspector of Police, Thiruvarur Taluk Police Station,3. Sri Nithik4. Bose5. Selvaraj ... RespondentsCriminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. r/w Section 528 of B.N.S.S. to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to conduct further investigation as against the 3rd to 5th respondent in Crime No.49 of 2025 dated 05.02.2025 pending on the file of 2nd respondent and file the final report expeditiously. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Muthamizhselvakumar For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) (for R1 & R2)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 1st and 2nd respondents to conduct further investigation as against the 3rd to 5th respondent in Crime No.49 of 2025 dated 05.02.2025 pending on the file of 2nd responden...
Devi Granites Vs Assistant Commissioner ST
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.04.2025CoramThe Honourable Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy and W.M.P.No.17748 & 17752 of 2025 Tvl. Devi Granites rep. By its Proprietrix, 5 6F-2, Thattan Thottam, Avinasilingampalayam, Tiruppur 641 654. ..Petitioner Vs.1. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Avinashi Assessment Circle, Avinashi.2. The Deputy Commissioner (CT)Erode. ..Respondents Prayer Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for records relating to the order-in-reference No.ZD331123136516R dated 22.11.2022, along with annexures passed by the first respondent and to quash the same. For Petitioner : M/s.R.Sri Visvapriya For Respondents : Ms.P.Selvi Government Advocate (T)OrderHeard M/s.R.Sri Visvapriya learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Ms.P.Selvi, learned Government Advocate (T) who takes notice on behalf of the respondents. With consent, the main Writ Petition is taken up for fi...
Rama Radhakrishnan vs V.P.Radhakrishnan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA and Rama Radhakrishnan ... Petitioner Vs. V.P. Radhakrishnan ... Respondent Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to strike off the plaint filed in OS.No.259/2015 on the file of the learned District Munsif Court, Panruti. For Petitioner : M/s.R.SreedharORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the above Civil Revision Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Index : Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No To 1.The District Munsif Court, Panruti. P.T. ASHA. J., and...
S.Karthik vs ICICI Bank Ltd
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.04.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY S.KARTHIK ... Petitioner Vs1. ICICI BANK LTD, PLOT NO. 15, MARUDHUPANDIYAR STREET, MAHALAKSHMI NAGAR, CHENNAI 600 064.2. THE PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, 769, SPENCER PLAZA, GROUND FLOOR, MOUNT ROAD, CHENNAI - 600 002.3. ICICI BANK LTD, RANI KHOTHI, POLICE LANE, GN ROAD, KAMPTEE 441002, NAGPUR DIST., MAHARASTHRA.4. ICICI BANK LTD, NEAR AUDI SHOWROOM WARDHA ROAD, SOMALAWADA SQ, NAGPUR 440010, MAHARASHTRA.5. ICICI BANK LTD, 373, RAJDANGA MAIN ROAD, RASHBEHARI CONNECTOR KASBA, KOLKATA 700078.6. ICICI BANK LTD, E2/27 SECTOR 07 ROHINI, DELHI - 110 85.7. THE PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, PLOT NO. 335M WARD 12B, GANDHIPURAM, KUTCH, GUJARAT -370 201.8. THE ICICI BANK LTD TILOK NIWAS, N.H- 37, NEAR FISH MARKET, BIJOY NAGAR 781 122, KAMRUP DIST., ASSAM.9. ICICI BANK LTD., ARORA HEIGHTS, PP. COMPOUND, MAIN ROAD, RANCHI 834 001, JHARKHAND.10. ICICI BANK LTD., AKARSHAN BUSIPLEX, 26, CENTRAL BAZAR...
Devi Granites Vs Assistant Commissioner ST
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.04.2025CoramThe Honourable Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy and W.M.P.No.17739 & 17741 of 2025 Tvl. Devi Granites rep. By its Proprietrix, 5 6F-2, Thattan Thottam, Avinasilingampalayam, Tiruppur 641 654. ..Petitioner Vs.1. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Avinashi Assessment Circle, Avinashi.2. The Deputy Commissioner (CT) Erode. ..RespondentsPrayer Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for records relating to the order-in-reference No.ZD331024157993C dated 22.10.2024 passed by the first respondent and to quash the same. For Petitioner : M/s.R.Sri Visvapriya For Respondents : Ms.P.Selvi Government Advocate (T)OrderHeard M/s.R.Sri Visvapriya learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Ms.P.Selvi, learned Government Advocate (T) who takes notice on behalf of the respondents. With consent, the main Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the st...
J.S.Gopalakrishnan (Office Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and J.S.Gopalakrishnan ... Petitioner Vs Coimbatore 641 003. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records from the respondents and quash the order issued by the 3rd respondent under Lr.No.L.Dis.A3/23721/2015, dated 06.11.2015 as the same isunjust, illegal and incompetent and consequentially direct the respondents to consider the seniority of the petitioner in the post of Junior Assistant with effect from 03.08.1970 instead of 11.06.1979, by counting the services of the petitioner in the post of Telephone Operator to the cadre of Junior Assistant. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.K.Suresh Government Advocate for R1 and R2 Mr.S.Manikandan for R3ORDERThere is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.2. The learned Standing Counsel for the 3rd r...
M/S.Omkar vs the Commissioner Tax Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.04.2025CoramThe Honourable Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy and W.M.P.Nos.17488 & 17491 of 2025 M/s. Omkar, rep. by its Proprietor, Mrs. Gyantidevi ...Petitioner Vs. The State Tax Officer Choolai Assessment Circle, Chennai Respondent Prayer Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for records from the file of the respondent and to quash the impugned assessment order dated 15.11.2024 bearing No.33BEKP G4049E1ZS/2022-23 passed by the respondent as arbitrary.For Petitioner : Mr.J.Ashish For Respondent : Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran Government Advocate (T)OrderHeard Mr.J.Ashish learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate (T) who takes notice on behalf of the respondent. With consent, the main Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.2. The challenge in this Writ...
J.Pradeepson Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.04.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No. 13630 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.No.9048 of 2025 J.Pradeepson .... Petitioner Vs 1.The State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Perundurai Police Station, Erode District. 2.Prakash .... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records in C.C.No.88 of 2025 pending on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate, Perundurai and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Bharathy For R1 : Mr.R.Vinothraja, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.88 of 2025 pending on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate, Perundurai.2. The case of the prosecution is that on 26.07.2024 at 13:30 hrs.,the petitioner along with other accused persons allegedly operated a prostitution business under the guise of a massage center in a bu...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »