Chennai Court April 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.Ravi vs the Sub Registrar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH K.Ravi S/o.Kannan (m/961 Yrs), No.181, Mth Road, Ambattur Market Road, Ambattur, Tiruvallur District, Tamil Nadu - 600 053. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Sub Registrar Avadi Sub Registrar Office, Anna Nagar Main Road, Modern City, Deena Dayalan Nagar, Pattabiram, Thiruvallur, Tamil Nadu - 600 054. 2.K. Nadanasabapathy S/o. Kandaswamy, No.5, Angala Parameshwari Kovil, 4th Street, M.G.R. Nagar, K.K. Nagar, Chennai - 600078. Respondent(s)Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st Respondent herein, not to entertain any kind of deed registration from the2nd respondent with respect to the schedule property, which is vacant land situated in Thiruvallur District, Avadi Taluk, Avadi Sub registrar Office No.25, Paruthipattu Village, Block No.0021, T.S.52/0, S.No.716/9A1A1A2, Kamaraj Nagar, Jeevanantham 3rd Cross Str...
Rathinam(Died) vs Manglitya Fusekhan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on : 03.02.2025Pronounced on : 30.04.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE C.M.A. No. 2617 of 2019 Rathinam (Died)2. R. Dhanasekar3. R. Sivakumar ... Appellants[ Sole Appellant died, Appellants 2 & 3 are brought on record as Lrs of the deceased sole appellant, viz., Rathinam, Vide Court Order dated 19.07.2024 made in C.M.P.Nos.15350, 15353 and 15355 of 2024]Versus1. Manglitya Fusekhan2. IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co., Ltd.No. 28, 2nd Floor, North Usman Road, T. Nagar, Chennai 17. ... Respondents [ The 1st respondent set remained ex-parte before the Tribunal. Hence notice may be dispensed with in this appeal.] Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to enhance the compensation in the Judgment and Decree dated 29.10.2018 made in M.C.O.P.No.6527 of 2015 on the file of the MACT/IV- Chief Small Causes Court at Chennai. For Appell...
The Divisional Manager Vs Ahamed Basha
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON : 25.02.2025PRONOUNCED ON : 30.04.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE The Divisional Manager, M/s.Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited, No.37, Kadampuliyur Post, Panruti, Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu. ... Appellant Vs. 1.Mr. Ahamed Basha 2.Mr. Boopathy 3.Mr. Manjini 4.The Divisional Manager, M/s.Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Bharathi Road, Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu. ... RespondentsPRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and decree dated 23.09.2021 made in M.C.O.P.No.1183 of 2017 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, District Court, Puducherry. For Appellant : Mr. M.B. Raghavan for M/s. M.B. Gopalan Associates. For Respondents : Mr. V.S. Senthil Kumar for R1. Mr. V. Regunathan for R2. Mr. S. Senthil kumar for R4. R3 sd No appearance.JUDGMENT(Delivered by Dr. A.D. Maria clete, J) ...
Muthammal vs Selvakumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI W/o.Subramaniam, Thottiyandurai, Manurpalyaam Village, Dhjarapuram Tk, Tiruppur District and another Vs S/o.Ammaniammal, Ganapathipalayam, Ruthiravathi Village, Dharapuram Taluk, Tirupur District and another SA SR NO. 14584 of 2025 Vs For Appellant(s) : Mr.R. RajarajanT.V.THAMILSELVI, J.mpsORDERThis petition has been filed to condone the delay of 120 days in filling the above Appeal. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that since the bundle was misplaced they were not able to file an appeal on time. Hence, the delay of 120 days occurred. 3.On being satisfied with the averments assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition and due to lack of communication, the petitioners are unable to follow up the proceedings, this Court is inclined to condone the delay. Hence, the delay is condoned and this petition is ordered. 30-04-2025 mps Note to office:Registry ...
N.Indra vs M/S. D.Bakthavachalu and Co.,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 30.04.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN and W.M.P.No.12445 of 2025 N.Indra .. Applicant Vs 1.D.Bakthavachalu & Co. Rep. by its Partner E.Thanigaimalai No.32/50, Gandhi Road, Jagnathan Nagar, Arumbakkam, Chennai - 600 106. 2.The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008. 3.The Chief Executive Officer, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008. ..Respondents Prayer: Review Application is filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 Read with Section 114 of CPC to review the order dated 10.01.2025 made in W.P.No.37950 of 2016 and set aside the same.Page No:1/12 For Applicant : Mr C.K.Chandrasekkar for Mr.C.Umashankar For Respondents : Mr.P.Kumaresan AAG for R2 and R3 Asst. by Mrs.P.Veena Suresh Standing Counsel (CMDA)JUDGMENTThis review application is directed against the order passed by this Court in W.P. N...
N.Sathish Kumar vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH N.Sathish Kumar .. Petitioner Vs Tirupattur .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for rd issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 3 respondent to pass necessary orders on the petitioner's representation dated 21.01.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sathyabal For Respondents : Mr.P.Sathish Additional Government PleaderORDERThis writ petition has been filed for issue of a writ of mandamus directing rd the 3 respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioner on 21.01.2025, wherein, the petitioner is seeking for transfer of patta in his name.2. When the matter came up for hearing on 23.04.2025, this Court passed the following order : Mr.P.Sathish, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3.2. Post this case at the end of the motion list on 30.04.2025. In themeantime, the ...
United India Insurance Company Ltd Vs S Boopathy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
CMP No.10824 of 2025 in CMA SR No.43737 of 2025S.SOUNTHAR, J.Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed along with the petition, the delay of 266 days in re-presenting the appeal is condoned. 30.04.2025 mst https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The State of Tamil Nadu vs Dr.Harikrishna R.R
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
CMP.No.7648 of 2025 in WA.SR.No.42952 of 2025S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.ANDK.RAJASEKAR, J.In view of the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of the petition, delay stands condoned and this Miscellaneous Petition is ordered, accordingly, (S.M.S., J.) (K.R.S., J.) 30.04.2025 veda Note:Registry is directed to number the writ appeal, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
SASIKALA Vs The State Rep.by its, The Inspector of Police,.
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.04.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.13903 of 2025 and Crl.MP.No.9300 of 2025 Sasikala ... Petitioner Vs. The State represented by its; 1.The Inspector of Police, (crime No.45 of 2018) 2.R.Tamilmaran .. Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to call for the records pertaining to CC.No.21 of 2024 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Kallakurichi and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Manoharan For Respondents For R1 : Mr.R.Vinothraja, Government Advocate(crl.side)ORDERThis Criminal Original petition has been filed praying to quash the proceedings in CC.No.21 of 2024 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Kallakurichi.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.3. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel forthe petiti...
Continuum Green Energy Limited Vs Union Of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED :30.04.2025CoramThe Honourable Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy and W.M.P.Nos.12280, 12281 and 12282 of 2025 Continuum Green Energy Limited Through its Authorized Representative Mr. Nilesh Ramesh Patil ...Petitioner Vs. Hosur - 635 109 ...RespondentsPrayer :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for records pertaining to the impugned order dated 14.03.2025 vide Order No. the Respondent No. 3 and to quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the Respondent No. 3 and 4 to forthwith release the conveyance and the goods belonging to the petitioner and thus render justice.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vasanth For Respondents 3 and 4 : Ms.P.Selvi Government Advocate (T) The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted a letter dated 28.04.2025 addressed to the Registry for listing the Writ Petition under the caption ''For Withdr...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »