Chennai Court April 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
G. Vadivelu Vs Mr. J. Kumaragurubaran, I.A.S., and another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.04.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI G.Vadivelu ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Mr.J.Kumaragurubaran, IAS Commissioner, Rippon Building, Park Town, Chennai 600 003. 2.Mr.G.Saravanamurthy The District Revenue Officer, Land and Estate Department, Chennai 600 003. ... Respondents Prayer : Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying to punish the respondents for having committed contempt of Court for disobeying the order made in W.P.No.2710 of 2011 dated 27.08.2019 in accordance with law. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Rajasekar For Respondents : Mr.S.GopinathM.DHANDAPANI,J.priORDERThis contempt petition is filed alleging willful disobedience of theorder dated 27.08.2019 made in W.P.No.2710 of 2011.2.This Court vide order dated 27.08.2019 made in W.P.No.2710 of 2011 issued direction to the respondents to evict the third respondent in the writ petition and to pass orders allotting shop no.3 in favour of the...
S. Maragatham vs N. Narayanasamy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA CRP.(PD).No.1887 of 2025 and CMP.Nos.10886 of 2025 S.Maragatham ... Petitioner Vs. R.Narayanasamy ... Respondent Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and final order passed in IA.No.10 of 2024 in OS.No.219/2020 dated 29.01.2025 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruppur by allowing the CRP. For Petitioner : M/s.N.UmapathiORDERAggrieved by the refusal on the part of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruppur to reopen the case for examining the 3 witnesses on the side of the plaintiff, the petitioner/plaintiff is before this Court.2. The petitioner/plaintiff had filed a suit OS.No.219/2020 on the file of the aforesaid Court, for specific performance against the respondent.3. During the cross examination, the respondent had admitted theearlier mortgage with third party and th...
P. Vijayan vs Saravanan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI S/o.Prakasam, Itchiputhu Village and Post, Arakkonam Taluk, Ranipet District Vs S/o.Jayaraman, res at Kizhavanam Village and Post, Arakkonam Taluk, Ranipet District and 3 Others SA SR NO. 101793 of 2024 Vs For Appellant(s): Mr.A.IlayaperumalORDERThis petition has been filed to condone the delay of 206 days in representing the appeal.T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.mps 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.On being satisfied with the averments assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Court is inclined to condone the delay. Hence, the delay is condoned. 30.05.2025 mps Note to office:Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in orderand list this matter on 23.06.2025....
United India Insurance Co Ltd Vs Selvarathinam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
CMP No.7092 of 2025 in CMA SR No.38399 of 2025S.SOUNTHAR, J.Notice to the respondents 2, 3 and 5 already dispensed with. Mr.R.Neethiperumal, learned counsel takes notice for the fourth respondent. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents 1, 4 and 7. Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed along with the petition the delay of 10 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Registry is directed to number the civilmiscellaneous appeal, if it is otherwise in orderand list the same for admission. Registry is directed to print the name of Mr.A.S.Vijayaraghavan, counsel for the first respondent, Mr.R.Neethiperumal, counsel for the 4th respondent and Mr.N.Thamizhanban, counsel for the 7th respondent at the time of admission. 30.04.2025 mst https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M.Chandramohan vs the Principal Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH M.Chandramohan .. Petitioner VsCoimbatore .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for st issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 1 respondent to pass orders in pursuance to the proceedings dated 26.03.2024 made in Na.Ka.3482/2018/J3 on nd the file of the 2 respondent by considering the petitioner's representation dated 16.11.2024 and pass appropriate orders within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.For Petitioner : Mr.C.Munusamy For Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran Special Government PleaderORDERThis writ petition has been filed for issue of a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to pass orders based on the representation made by the petitioner on 16.11.2024, wherein, the petitioner is seeking for issuance of patta in his name, pursuant to the quashing of the Urban Land Ceiling proceedings.2. When the matter c...
THE GENERAL MANAGER Vs The Special Deputy Commissioner of Labor
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE R. SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN in W.A.Sr.No.40240 of 20251. The General Manager Metropolitan Transport Corporation Chennai Ltd Pallavan Illam Anna Salai Chennai 600 002 Appellant(s) Vs1. The Special Deputy Commissioner of G. Kolappadhas (Died).Respondent(s) PRAYER: To condone the delay of 1035 days in filing the Writ Appeal against the order passed in Writ Petition no.29405 of 2013 dated 11.04.2022. For Appellant(s): Mr.R.Raman Laal, Additional Advocate General Assisted By Mr.C.Gauthamaraj For The Appellant. For Respondent(s): Ms.L.Meenakshi For R2 To R4. R-1 The Special Deputy Commissioner Of Labor R-2 Ajitha R-3 K.A. Archana R-4 K.A. Dhivya *****ORDER(Order of the Court was made by R.Subramanian J.) This petition is filed seeking to condone the delay of 1035 days in filing the above appeal.2. We are not happy with the reasons that have been cited as sufficient cause f...
G.Rajangam vs Geetha Saraswathi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI S/o.A.Govindan, Door No.3/45, Ganapathy Nagar, Palur, Kuthur Post Office, Trichy District 621 216 Now Residing at Plot no.2, Flat No.D, Raja Jothi Nilayam, Pillaiyar Koil Street, thoraipakkam, Chennai 600 097 Vs W/o.Santhanam, Residing at C-1, ist Floor, Gosel Garden No.1, III Main Road, Indira Nagar, Chennai 600 020 and another SA SR NO. 12634 of 2025 Vs For Appellant(s): Mr.K.ShakespeareT.V.THAMILSELVI, J.mpsORDERThis petition filed to dispense with the production of the certified copy of the Judgment and Decree dated 23.11.2022 in O.S.No.2706 of 2016 on the file of the learned I Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, pending disposal of the appeal is ordered. 30-04-2025 mps Note to office:Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in orderand list this matter on 24.06.2025....
The State of Tamil Nadu vs Parthiban Prashanth a
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
CMP.No.7239 of 2025 in WA.SR.No.40523 of 2025S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.ANDK.RAJASEKAR, J.In view of the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of the petition, delay stands condoned and this Miscellaneous Petition is ordered, accordingly, (S.M.S., J.) (K.R.S., J.) 30.04.2025 veda Note:Registry is directed to number the writ appeal, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
S.JAYASUDHA Vs The State Rep.by The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN1. S.Jayasudha2. K.Janakiram ... PetitionersVs The State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Chennai. ... Respondent Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of B.N.N.S., to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioners without due process of law based on a false complainant. For Petitioners : Mr..Ragu For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioners without due process of law based on a false complainant.2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that there is no petition or enquiry is pending as against the petitioners herein.3. Recording the aforesaid submission, this criminal original petition is closed. Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation/Yes/No kv To1. The Inspector of Police, Chennai.2. The Public Prosec...
V.Sagunthala vs M.Padmavathy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.04.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA V.Sagunthala ... Petitioner Vs. 1.M.Padmavathy 2.S.Bhuvaneswari ... Respondents Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to direct the Additional District and Sessions Judge III at Poonamallee to conduct the speedy trial and dispose the original suit in OS.No.489 of 2024 within a time frame fixed. For Petitioner : M/s.N.ElayarajaORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the above Civil Revision Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Index : Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No To 1.The Additional District and Sessions Judge III at Poonamallee P.T. ASHA. J.,...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »