Chennai Court March 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The National Insurance Co.Ltd., Vs Indra
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
C.M.P.Nos. 1383 and 1386 of 2023 in C.M.A.Nos.2974 and 2975 of 2022S.SOUNTHAR, J.Heard the arguments of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the respondent.2. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions, these civil miscellaneous petitions are allowed.3. The Registry is directed to make necessary amendment in the cause title. 28.03.2025 ub https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Vimala @ Vidhubala vs Suresh
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.03.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE C.M.P.No.4201 of 2025 in C.M.A.Sr.No.72456 of 2022 Vimala @ Vidhubala .. Petitioner Vs. Suresh .. Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Order XLI Rule 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to restore the C.M.P.No.29470 of 2024 dated 02.01.2025, which was dismissed for non-prosecution and dispose the case on merits. For the Petitioners : Mr.S.N.SubramaniORDER(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) This petition is filed to restore C.M.P.No.29470 of 2024, which was dismissed for default on 02.01.2025.2. Mr.S.N.Subramani, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated the circumstances under which on both the occasions, none could be present before this Court on behalf of the petitioner.3. Having been satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered. (R.S.K., J.) (A.D....
The Management vs the Presiding Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
C.M.P. No.1460 of 2025 in W.A. SR. No.6150 of 2025R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.andG. ARUL MURUGAN, J.Accepting the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay of 323 days in filing the above appeal is condoned. [R.S.M., J.] [G.A.M., J.] 28.03.2025 sri https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/1...
J.Asha Beevi vs S.I.Aslam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.03.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.R.C.No. 157 of 20251. Mrs.J Asha Beevi2. Minor A.Arif3. Minor A.AneeshaMinors 2 and 3 represented by their mother and natural guardian Mrs.J.Asha Beevi ... Petitioners Vs S.I.Aslam ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 442 of BNSS, to enhance the maintenance amount as ordered in M.P.No.1316 of 2024 in M.C.No.641 of 2022 dated 30.10.2024 on the file of the III Additional Principal Family Court, Chennai.For Petitioners : Mr.S.William For Respondent : Mr.Y.KajanavasORDERThis Criminal Revision Petition has been filed to enhance the maintenance amount as ordered in M.P.No.1316 of 2024 in M.C.No.641 of 2022 dated 30.10.2024 on the file of the III Additional Principal Family Court, Chennai.2. This Criminal Revision Petition in Crl.R.C.No.157 of 2025 hasbeen filed by the wife and the connected Crl.R.C.No.2186 of 2024 has been filed by the husband and bot...
Abdul Majeed vs Abdul Rahman
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 28.03.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA and CMP.Nos.7809 & 7816 of 2025 Abdul Majeed ... Petitioner in both CRPs Vs.Abdul Rahman ... Respondent in both CRPs Common Prayer: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 17.10.2024 passed in CMA.No.32 of 2020 & CMA.No.33 of 2020 respectively on the file of XV Additional City Civil Court at Chennai, confirming the order passed in I.A.No.110 of 2017 dated 15.11.2019 in O.S.No.67 of 2017 and I.A.No.111 of 2017 dated 15.11.2019 in O.S.No.67 of 2017 on the file of VII Assistant City Civil Court at Chennai.For Petitioner : Mr.K.Rajasekaran (in both cases)COMMON ORDERThe defendant in O.S.No.67 of 2019 on the file of City Civil Court is the petitioner before this Court.2. The suit in O.S.No.67 of 2017 is filed by the plaintiff/respondentfor the following reliefs : a) for a permanent injuncti...
S.Madhan vs State Rep.by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.03.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and Crl.M.P.No.1430 of 2024 S.Madhan ... Petitioner Vs1. State Rep.By The Inspector of Police, J-2, Traffic Investigation Wing, Adayar TIW, Chennai TIW East, Adayar, Chennai.2. B.Mohan3. Jayakumar(R3 impleaded vide Court orderdated 27.02.2024 in and Crl.M.P.No.1430 of 2024) ... Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, 2023/Section 482 of Cr.P.C., pleased to call for the records of respondent police relating to Cr.No.79 of 2023 and quash the same so far as the petitioner herein. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Mohana Krishnan For R1 : Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Crl.side) For R2 : Mr.S.Gokulakrishnan For R3 : Mr.P.Rajkumar PandianORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Cr.No.79 of 2023 on the file of the first respondent herein.2. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.3. T...
B. Lakshmi Prabha, Vs Tmt. kalai Selvi Mohan,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED 28.03.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR B.Lakshmi Prabha ... Petitioner Vs Mrs.Kalaiselvi Mohan, District Collector, Kancheepuram District Collectorate, Collectorate Compound, Kancheepuram 631 502. ... Respondent Prayer:- Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act to punish the respondent for wilfully disobeying the Order passed in W.P.No.20989 of 2024 dated 25.07.2024. For Petitioner : Ms.E.Thamizhannai for M/s.Sampathkumaar and Associates For Respondent : Mr.A.Selvendran, Special Government PleaderN.SATHISH KUMAR, J.vrcORDERHeard Ms.E.Thamihannai, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.A.Selvendran, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent.2. When the matter is taken up today, the learned SpecialGovernment Pleader appearing for the respondent submitted that an award has been passed in respect of 150 sq.mtr and the award amount will deposited to the petitione...
A.G.Mahendiran vs the State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.03.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI W.P.No.10370 of 2025 and W.M.P.No.11667 of 2025 A.G. Mahendiran Petitioner vs.1. The District Collector Collectorate Office Salem 636 0012. The Sub Collector Mettur Dam3. The Tahsildar of Mettur Taluk Taluk Office Mettur Dam4. The Block Development Officer Nangavalli Post Nangavalli5. The Assistant Engineer Nangavalli Post6. The Executive Engineer P.W.D. (Water Management) Mettur Dam 636 401 Page Nos.1/87. The Gonur West Panchayat represented by its President Santhathanapatti Village Andikarai Post8. S. Ramachandran (Ex-Ward Member)9. A. Sivan (Ex-Ward Member RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records from the seventh respondent panchayat and to quash the resolution dated 20.05.2024 of Gonur West Village Panchayat for laying road in S.No.691 o...
K.Anbazhagan vs the Registrar General
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
2025:MHC:830 THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON : 21.03.2025PRONOUNCED ON : 28.03.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN and W.M.P.No.3550 of 2025 K.Anbazhagan S/o.Kuppusamy No.36/22, Aiyyanar Koil Theru, Mannalur, Virudhachalan Taluk, Cuddalore. ... Petitionerversus1.The Registrar General, Madras High Court. 2.The Principal District Judge, Cuddalore. 3.The Additional Sub Judge, Virudhachalam. 4.The Principal District Munsif, Tittagudi. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of constitution of India, praying for issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent dated26.11.2024 in order No 161 / 2024 and to quash the same consequently to direct the 2nd respondent to re-fix in the actual Basic Pay at Level 7 Index 35as was drawn by the petitioner prior to the passing of the impugned orderpassed by the 2nd respon...
K. Baskaran vs S. Uma
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated :28.03.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR CMA No.618 of 2025 K.Baskaran ... Appellant Vs. 1.S.Uma 2..The Divisional Manager United India Insurance Co. Ltd, DO, 13A, Nethaji Road, Cuddalore 607 001. ... Respondents Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act, to allow the appeal and enhance compensation in MCOP No.2729 of 2015 dated 08.03.2024 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Special District Court II, Cuddalore. For Appellant : Mr.Ramya V.Rao For Respondents : Mr.R.Rathna Thara for R2 R1-Notice dispensed with.JUDGMENTNot satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the injured claimant has come before this court by way of this appeal seeking enhancement of the compensation.2. It is not in dispute that the appellant/claimant suffered injuryin a road accident that had taken place on 26.06.2015 when he was riding in Hero Honda motorc...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »